cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 16 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 9 No 2 (2020)" : 16 Documents clear
Pancasila and Religious Values in Establishment of Legal Regulations Muhammad Hoiru Nail; Made Arya Utama
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p06

Abstract

In the news today (news update), Indonesia was briefly chopped off with headlines from the religion of the great enemy Pancasila. In this paper, we will discuss the relationship between Pancasila, religion and the formation of legislation. This is deliberately discussed in this paper to avoid greater mistakes especially for Indonesian people related to the relationship of religious values ??and Pancasila, as well as the relationship of religious values ??with the Formation of Laws and Regulations. This research is qualified into normative legal research that starts from the obscurity of the norms, namely Article 2 the Formation of Laws and Regulations that stated "Pancasila, the source of all sources of state law". The results of this study indicate that religion and Pancasila are not contradicting. Pancasila is formed on the basis of noble values ??and virtues that exist in each religion which later becomes the first precepts of Pancasila "The Godhead of the One". The relationship of religious values ??with the formation of legislation is very thick when juridically the religion animates the opening of paragraph 3 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and several existing legal products are reflected/based on religion.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak-Anak Disabilitas Terkait Hak Pendidikan di Kabupaten Buleleng Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p11

Abstract

Persons with disabilities are often forgotten in the development of law and also participation in legal development so that their access to justice is vulnerable. Persons with disabilities must obtain the same rights as others without exception. This is to give them a sense of fairness that persons with disabilities are entitled to an education in this country. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the legal protection of children with disabilities in the district of Buleleng. This research is a normative juridical legal research using a statutory approach. Based on the results of the study it was found that the legal protection received by children with disabilities in the district of Buleleng, especially in relation to education has not been touched even though the province of Bali has implemented local regulations that state the fulfillment of the rights of persons with disabilities including children, this is not yet fully can be implemented because the facilities and infrastructure that have not been met in Buleleng Regency so that the fulfillment of these rights is hampered. Penyandang disabilitas sering dilupakan dalam perkembangan hukum dan juga partisipasi dalam pembangunan hukum, sehingga menjadi rentan aksesnya terhadap keadilan. Penyandang disabilitas harus memperoleh hak yang sama dengan yang lain tanpa terkecuali. Hal ini untuk memberikan rasa adil kepada mereka bahwa penyandang disabilitas berhak untuk memperoleh pendidikan di negara ini. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk memberikan gambaran umum tentang perlindungan hukum terhadap anak-anak disabilitas yang ada di kabupaten Buleleng. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa perlindungan hukum yang diterima oleh anak-anak penyandang disabilitas di kabupaten Buleleng khususnya berkenaan dengan pendidikan masih belum tersentuh walaupun provinsi Bali telah menerapkan peraturan daerah yang menyatakan tentang pemenuhan hak-hak penyandang disabilitas termasuk anak-anak, hal ini belum sepenuhnya dapat di laksanakan karena sarana dan prasarana yang belum terpenuhi di Kabupaten Buleleng sehingga pemenuhan hak-hak tersebut menjadi terhambat.
Investment Limitation Between ASEAN and Non-ASEAN Countries in Presidential Regulation: Dimension of Non-Discrimination Principles Ni Luh Putu Wulan Purwanti
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p02

Abstract

Indonesia is bound by TRIMs agreements in terms of investment policies regarding goods trade and GATS regarding services trade. TRIMs and GATS as annexes of WTO agreements adhere to the non-discrimination principle namely MFN and NT. The difference in the percentage of the amount of capital that allowed to be owned in several business fields for a foreign investor to the investor from ASEAN and Non-ASEAN member countries is found in President Regulation No. 44/2016. Different treatment of non-ASEAN countries in the said Presidential Regulation whether it is a breach of the non-discrimination principle. It is deemed important to be investigated to know whether the investment regulations in Indonesia for the investors from ASEAN and Non-ASEAN countries have implemented the non-discrimination principle. Statutory and analytical of conceptual approach type in normative legal research were used in this writing. Indonesia as a developing country shall be included in the exemption by the WTO to make regulations which in this case give special treatment to ASEAN member countries as stipulated in Article 4 of the TRIMs and flexibility in implementing the non-discrimination principle referred to in Article 4 and 5 of GATS.
Bentuk Perjanjian dalam Proses Pelayanan Administrasi di Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Daerah Ponorogo Ferry Irawan Febriansyah; Linda Gusnia Rohmayanti
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p13

Abstract

This study was submitted to answer and describe the problems faced including the form of agreement in the administrative process in the Library and Archives of the Ponorogo Region and the implementation of the agreement in the administrative process in the Library and Archives of the Ponorogo Region. The research method used is an empirical juridical research method, where this method can answer and describe the question by collecting data obtained from interviews, observations and documentation at the research location so that it can describe it well. This research can be concluded that the practice of book lending agreements (library materials) in the Ponorogo Regional Library does not have a fixed legal force so that many parties do not carry out obligations in the loan book agreement. The factor that causes the parties not to carry out their obligations is the lack of self-awareness of the parties and the mild sanctions provided by the Library. Penelitian ini disampaikan untuk menjawab dan mendeskripsikan permasalahan yang dihadapi meliputi bentuk perjanjian dalam proses Administrasi di Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Daerah Ponorogo dan Implementasi perjanjian dalam proses Administrasi di Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Daerah Ponorogo. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis empiris, dimana dengan metode ini dapat menjawab dan mendeskripsikan pertanyaan dengan cara mengumpulkan data yang diperoleh dari kegiatan wawancara, pengamatan dan dokumentasi di lokasi penelitian sehingga dapat menjabarkannya dengan baik. Penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa praktik perjanjian pinjam buku (bahan pustaka) di Perpustakaan Daerah Ponorogo belum memiliki kekuatan hukum yang tetap sehingga banyak para pihak yang tidak melaksanakan kewajiban dalam perjanjian pinjam buku. Faktor yang menyebabkan para pihak tidak melaksanakan kewajibannya adalah kurangnya kesadaran diri para pihak, dan ringannya sanksi yang diberikan oleh Perpustakaan.
Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Anak Terhadap Tindak Kekerasan Melia Larassati
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p07

Abstract

Children are the next generation of the nation's future ideals asset as human resources for future national development, but today there are so many children who got violence in their lives. This research aims to analyzes the responsibilities of the government and contribution of Pusat Pelayanan Terpadu Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Anak related to the provision of protection against acts of violence. this research is normative legal research by conducting a study of rules, doctrines, and also legal principles. Secondary data collection was carried out using the library study method with various legal materials analyzed descriptively by the method of the statute and conceptual approach. This research shows that the government has provided legal protection for rights related to violence in the form of legal products in the form of Undang-Undang No.39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia and Undang-Undang No 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak. In addition to through legal products, the government also provides protection to children through the Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia land Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia Daerah and Pusat Pelayanan Terpadu Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Anak as a service center that empowers women and children in various fields such as development, providing protection for women and children against various forms of discrimination, trafficking in persons, and acts of violence. Anak merupakan generasi muda penerus cita-cita perjuangan bangsa sekaligus modal sumber daya manusia bagi pembangunan nasional ke depannya, Namun dewasa ini terjadi begitu banyak anak yang mengalami tindak kekerasan dalam kehidupannya. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tanggung jawab pemerintah dan kontribusi Pusat Pelayanan Terpadu Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Anak terkait dengan pemberian perlindungan terhadap tindak kekerasan. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode hukum normatif dengan melakukan kajian terhadap aturan, doktrin dan juga prinsip hukum. Pengumpulan data sekunder dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode studi kepustakaan dengan berbagai bahan hukum yang dianalisis secara deskriptif dengan metode pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Tulisan ini menunjukkan, Pemerintah telah memberikan perlindungan hukum terkait dengan tindak kekerasan dalam bentuk produk hukum berupa Undang-UndanglNo.39ltahunl1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia dan Undang-UndangMNoM35 TahunN2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Selain melalui produk hukum, pemerintah juga memberikan perlindungan kepada anak melalui Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia dan Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia Daerah serta Pusat Pelayanan Terpadu Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Anak sebagai pusat pelayanan yang melakukan pemberdayaan terhadap perempuan dan anak dalam berbagai bidang seperti pembangunan, pemberian perlindungan bagi perempuan dan anak terhadap berbagai bentuk diskriminasi, perdagangan orang, dan tindak kekerasan.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Perlindungan Konsumen, Pasca Undang-Undang No. 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan A Dwi Rachmanto
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p12

Abstract

The majority of civil case decisions specifically consumer protection are closely correlated with the financial services sector. Looking at and studying the verdicts of consumer protection cases contained in the Supreme Court (MA) website, it can be concluded that the consumer protection cases have increased significantly in the last 3 (three) years, between 2013 and 2017, especially after the enactment of Act Number 21 the Year 2011 concerning Financial Fervices Authority. This paper will analyze non-financial service case decisions, at least from the point of view of whether non-financial service case decisions are appropriately handled and understood by Supreme Court judges, BPSK Members, and by disputing parties based on Act Number 9 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection. The purpose of writing is to know what has been exactly done by BPSK and the judge and to analyze what is not appropriate normatively. The decision analysis is based on the classification of consumers, business actors, and the authority of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK). This paper will analyze 14 non-financial services Supreme Court (MA) decisions in the span of time between 2013 and 2017, and use the normative juridical research method. From the results of the verdict research, it appears that the understanding of MA judges, BPSK members, and the parties to the dispute has not fully understood the understanding of consumers, business actors, and the authority of BPSK in handling cases. Mayoritas putusan perkara perdata khusus perlindungan konsumen berkorelasi erat dengan bidang jasa keuangan. Melihat dan mempelajari putusan perkara perlindungan konsumen yang terdapat dalam laman Mahkamah Agung (MA) dapat disimpulkan bahwa perkara perlindungan konsumen mengalami peningkatan signifikan dalam kurun 3 (tiga) tahun terakhir, antara tahun 2013 sampai dengan tahun 2017, khususnya setelah berlakunya UU Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Tulisan ini akan menganalisis putusan perkara non jasa keuangan, setidaknya dari sudut pandang apakah putusan perkara non jasa keuangan telah tepat ditangani dan dipahami oleh hakim MA, Anggota BPSK dan oleh para pihak yang bersengketa berdasarkan UU Nomor 9 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Tujuan penulisan mengetahui apa yang telah tepat dilakukan oleh BPSK dan hakim serta menganalisis apa saja yang tidak tepat secara normatif. Analisis putusan dilakukan berdasarkan klasifikasi konsumen, pelaku usaha, dan kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK). Tulisan ini akan menganalisis 14 putusan MA (MA) non jasa keuangan dalam rentang waktu antara tahun 2013 sampai dengan tahun 2017, dan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Dari hasil penelitian putusan nampak bahwa pemahaman hakim MA, Anggota BPSK dan para pihak yang bersengketa belum sepenuhnya memahami pengertian konsumen, pelaku usaha, dan kewenangan BPSK dalam menangani perkara.
Child Labor Protection Based on Indonesian Manpower Act and Human Rights Principle Ridwan Arifin; Rodiyah Rodiyah; Aprilia Putri Adiningsih
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p03

Abstract

Child labor in many cases tends to experience various acts of crime and violence, even in the violation of their human rights, such as human trafficking and exploitation. Child labor has been regulated in various laws and regulations, including the Manpower Act. This paper examines three important key issues, namely: first, the legal protection of child labor in Indonesia based on labor and human rights laws, second, an analysis of the child labor protection rules applicable in Indonesia, and third, the emergence of child labor (child labor) in Indonesia. This research is normative legal research, where the study is literature. However, field data on this study were obtained from various related previous research results, both print and online sources. This research emphasized that the prohibition of working or employing children has been regulated in the Manpower Act which is closely related to efforts to protect children’s rights, which are also guaranteed protection in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights (Human Rights Act). The principle of child protection not only stipulated on Human Rights Act, but also Indonesian Manpower Act and Indonesia Child Protection Act. However, weaknesses of Manpower Act do not expressly prohibit child labor. In certain occupations, child labor is still permitted on various conditions. But in fact, these requirements are very difficult to control so that many children’s rights are violated.
Akibat Hukum Pelelangan Tanah Yang Menjadi Objek Sewa Menyewa Johanes Maria Vianney Graciano
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p08

Abstract

Leasing is one of methods to possess the land in Indonesia, which sometimes a legal dispute can arise during its implementation. One of such legal disputes is an auctioning of lease object, which being a case in civil case with registration number387/Plw/2011/PN.Dps. This dispute caused by a landlord’s action who’s without a good faith put a lease object under a mortgage as a collateral for his debt to third party and then he failed to settle such debt. The purpose of this research is to know the legal effect of auction of the lease object specifically concerning the existence of the lease agreement. The method using in this journal is normative legal research to analyze the legal effect of the auction to the existing land lease agreement and the possible legal remedy to undertake by the party who suffered a damage. Auctioning and transferring of lease object ownership shall not terminate the lease agreement as long as the lease agreement was made prior to the transferring of ownership except the agreement stipulates differently. In the agreement, one of parties who suffered damage has right to undertake a legal remedy to protect its right and interest. Sewa menyewa merupakan salah satu cara penguasaan atas tanah di Indonesia yang dalam pelaksanaannya sering mengakibatkan adanya sengketa. Salah satu sengketa hukum yang terjadi adalah pelelangan atas tanah yang sebelumnya telah menjadi objek perjanjian sewa menyewa, yang menjadi materi dalam perkara perdata Nomor 378/Plw/2011/PN.Dps. Permasalahan ini muncul akibat perbuatan pemilik tanah yang tanpa itikad baik membebani tanah yang telah disewakannya dengan hak tanggungan sebagai jaminan pelunasan hutangnya kepada pihak ketiga dan selanjutnya tidak mampu melunasi hutangnya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui akibat hukum dari adanya pelelangan objek sewa menyewa khususnya mengenai kelangsungan perjanjian sewa menyewa itu sendiri. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan jurnal ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang menganalisis akibat hukum pelelangan tanah terhadap kelangsungan perjanjian sewa menyewa serta upaya hukum yang dapat diambil oleh pihak yang merasa dirugikan. Pelelangan dan pengalihan kepemilikan atas suatu objek sewa tidak akan mengakhiri perjanjian sewa menyewa, sepanjang perjanjian sewa itu dibuat lebih awal daripada pengalihan hak kecuali diperjanjikan berbeda oleh para pihak. Pihak yang merasa haknya dirugikan dalam suatu perjanjian berhak mengambil upaya hukum untuk melindungi hak dan kepentingannya.
Dual Mediation : Penyelesaian Perkara Lingkungan Hidup yang Melibatkan Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice Ach. Faisol Triwijaya; Yaris Adhial Fajrin; Chintya Meilany Nurrahma
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p14

Abstract

The use of the environment today is very important in order to provide benefits to the community. Utilization must also be balanced with good management and avoid damage. Anomaly in the use of the environment that causes widespread damage occurs where there is a role of the corporation as the main actor. The presence of the PPLH Law has not been able to be a solution amid the chaotic environment utilization that is in line with the damage because the existing legal instruments are not able to overcome the problem. This paper has a purpose to analyze the weakness in the resolution of criminal acts of the environment and the extent to which restorative justice is able to overcome the conflict due to environmental criminal act between the corporation and the community. This research method uses normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach. This study obtained the first result, the legal instrument in the PPLH Law has not shown success where there is still widespread environmental destruction today. Second, through the restorative justice approach it is expected to be able to reduce the number of environmental criminal acts by corporations using the dual mediation pattern, namely the merging of the concepts of civil case mediation and penal mediation so as to create a balance pattern that is in line with the direction of the renewal of national criminal law. Pemanfaatan lingkungan hidup dewasa ini amat penting dilakukan guna memberikan manfaat terhadap masyarakat. Pemanfaatan harus pula diimbangi dengan pengelolaan yang baik dan menghindari kerusakan. Anomali pemanfaatan lingkungan hidup yang menyebabkan kerusakan marak terjadi, di mana terdapat peran korporasi sebagai aktor utama. Kehadiran UU PPLH masih belum mampu menjadi solusi di tengah carut marutnya pemanfaatan lingkungan yang sejalan dengan kerusakan karena instrumen hukum yang ada tidak mampu mengatasi masalah tersebut. Tulisan ini memiliki tujuan untuk menganalisa kelemahan dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana lingkungan hidup dan sejauh mana restorative justice mampu mengatasi konflik akibat tindak pidana lingkungan hidup antara korporasi dan masyarakat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian ini memperoleh hasil pertama, instrumen hukum di UU PPLH belum menunjukkan keberhasilan di mana masih maraknya kejadian pengrusakan lingkungan hidup hingga saat ini. Kedua, melalui pendekatan restorative justice diharapkan dapat menekan angka tindak pidana lingkungan hidup oleh korporasi menggunakan pola dual mediasi yaitu penggabungan konsep mediasi perkara perdata dan mediasi penal sehingga dapat menciptakan pola keseimbangan yang selaras dengan arah pembaruan hukum pidana Nasional.
Jagaddhita Family Saves Children from Violence and Exploitation: A Perspective on the Usage of the Non-Penal Policy AAA Ngurah Tini Rusmini Gorda; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p04

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine the child protection that is integral/simultaneous and prioritizing the non-penal policy by forming and realizing the Jagaddhita family. This research is normative juridical research. The results show that in terms of penal-policy the State has provided a legal umbrella through the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection as amended by the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 35 of 2014. However, as time goes by such Law is deemed unable to run effectively and the crime against children is increased. Establishing the Jagaddhita family as a non-penal policy is a strategic effort in eliminating any crime related to children. Such establishment is the goal of a marriage in which the marriage itself has four (4) main objectives namely Dharma, Artha, Kama, and Praja that will lead to the birth of good children.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 16

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue