cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
REINWARDTIA
Published by Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 1,467 Documents
 5   6   7   8   9 
A NEW COMBINATION IN OROPHEA (ANNONACEAE) FOR UVARIA NITIDA ROXB. EX G. DON Turner, Ian M.
REINWARDTIA Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Vol. 14 No. 1
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (666.778 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v14i1.414

Abstract

The identity of Uvaria nitida Roxb. ex G.Don. (Annonaceae) has not been considered for 180 years. The plant is only known from material grown in the Calcutta Botanic Garden in India following introduction from, reportedly, the Moluccas. Examination of a specimen from the Brussels Herbarium, designated here as lectotype, indicates that the species is a member of Orophea subgenus Sphaerocarpon, similar to Orophea gabra Merr. A new combination in Orophea is made.
NOTES ON RESUPINATE HYMENOMYCETES - II* The tulasnelloid fungi Donk, M. A.
REINWARDTIA Vol 3, No 3 (1956): vol.3 no.3
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3806.185 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v3i3.988

Abstract

1. Discussed are the tulasnelloid fungi, i.e. Tulasnella and other groups considered related by the author and also possessing spores capable of exhibiting repetition and not becoming septate.2. The author rejects the designation epibasidia and considers the sterigmata in Tulasnella and Gloeotulasnella as being merely strongly inflated, a view already widely accepted.3. He rejects the families Tulasnellaceae and Ceratobasidiaceae and includes them and the other tulasnelloid fungi in the Corticiaceae, which is still a heterogeneous group. Possible relations with other families are discussed.
PRELIMINARY REVISIONS OF SOME GENERA OF MALAYSIAN PAPILIONACEAE I MEEUWEN, M. S. VAN; NOOTEBOOM, H. P.; STEENIS, C.G.G.J VAN
REINWARDTIA Vol 5, No 4 (1961): vol.5 no.4
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (733.893 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v5i4.207

Abstract

The revisions have been performed by Miss M. S. van Meeuwen (Pycnospora, Smithia, Uraria), H. P. Nooteboom (Galactia, Moghania, Rhynehosia, Stylosanthes, Zornia), and C. G. G. J. van Steenis (Cyclocarpa, Neocollettia).
A CRITICAL STUDY IN THE COMPLEX-POLYMORPHOUS GENUS SCHIMA (THEACEAE) BLOEMBERGEN, S.
REINWARDTIA Vol 2, No 1 (1952): vol.2 no.1
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1247.477 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v2i1.1019

Abstract

 1. The author considers the genus Schima monotypic. Its only species, Schima wallichii (DC.) Korth., is subdivided into nine geographically separated subspecies and three varieties.These may be recognised sometimes by one dominating chax*acter,mostly, however, by a complex of characters.Several new combinations are made.2. Yet the variability of most of the subspecies is still often enormous and at first sight appears complex. Thus we may often encounter the polymorphy of the whole species in its subspecies again. It was the striking different percentage-numbers of(phenotypically) about the same characters which turned the scale in favour of the recognition of the subspecies, besides their geographic separation.The attempts made by the author to divide certain resulting complex-polymorphous subspecies into units of still lower rank and to trace correlations with peculiarities of environment such as different heights above sealevel, or with different stages in the age of the trees, failed. 3. On account of these negative results and the above mentioned different percentage-numbers for phenotypically about the same characters, the author came to the conclusion that the most probable explanation is that the variability within the subspecies is just due to Mendel-segregation and nothing else.It looks very much as if one is dealing here with the inheriting of striking characters, each caused by one or only a few polymeric factors, characters which hold their own, just as in panmictlcally propagated populations (by cross-pollination). This explanation, too,makes the striking fact that in some subspecies we find back phenotypically the whole, or part, of the polymorphy of the entire species more understandable, as well as the fact that individuals of different subspecies may agree phenotypically, whereas genotypically they belong to different races (subspecies), Moreover, all these phenomena strongly support the monotypic conception of the genus. 4. The author saw few examples from the area outside Indonesia. However,this does neither influence his monotypic conception of the genus, nor his method of dividing it into units of lower ranks. The study of the scanty amount of specimens,literature, and the drawings seen appeared more than sufficiently convincing. Yet he is not quite certain whether the correct rank was ascribed to some of the lower taxa involved. It would perhaps have been advisable to consider the variety superba and the continental parts of the subspecies oblata and monticola as distinct subspecies.Future consideration of this matter shall have to decide.
THE TAXONOMIC POSITION OF PAPUODENDRON C.T. WHITE AS ELUCIDATED BY ANATOMICAL CHARACTERS Heel, W. A. van
REINWARDTIA Vol 8, No 2 (1972): vol.8 no.2
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (203.478 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v8i2.232

Abstract

When, in 1946, White described Papuodendron lepidotum from New Guinea, he apparently hesitated to incorporate this species in the Bombacaceae.
SOME SOOTY MOULDS AND BLACK MILDEWS FROM SINGAPORE AND THE MALAY PENINSULA LIM, G.
REINWARDTIA Vol 9, No 2 (1975): vol.9 no.2
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (903.951 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v9i2.910

Abstract

In Singapore and the Malay Peninsula sooty moulds and black mildews are common. Colonies of these fungi on plant foliage often consist of several species mixed together and each species may produce more than one type of conidia and other fruiting structures. The specimens collected and examined are described and listed under Ascomycetes (17 species) and Fungi Imperfecti (16 species). The most common species were those of Meliola and Microxyphium. A host list is provided.
The status of Semeiocardium Zoll. (Balsaminaceae) Utami, Nanda
REINWARDTIA Vol 13, No 1 (2009): Vol. 13 No. 1
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (388.452 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v13i1.6

Abstract

On the basis of comparison with other characters of two subgenera of the genus Impatiens, Semeiocardium Zoll. is proposed to be best treated as a subgenus of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae). Subgenus Semeiocardium (Zoll.) N. Utami is distinguished from the other two subgenera in the number of locular ovary and its connate wing petals. Subgenus Semeiocardium has 20 species in four sections of Impatiens in the sense of Warburg & Reiche (1896). There are 14 species of Impatiens in section Microcentron Warb., 3 species of section Macrocentron Warb, 2 species of section Brachycentron Warb., and 1 species of section Brevicalcaratae Warb.
THE FERN-GENUS ARCYPTERIS UNDERWOOD (Dictyopteris PresI sensu Fee) HOLTTUM, R. E.
REINWARDTIA Vol 1, No 2 (1951): vol.1 no.2
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (168.396 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v1i2.1057

Abstract

1. The genus Arcypteris Underw. (Dictyopteris Presl sensu Pee) is maintained as different from Tectaria Cav. and redefined. It is considered very closely related to Pleocnemia Presl. 2. Four species are recognized. 3. The following new combinations are made: Arcypteris irregularis (Presl) Holttum (basinym: Polypodium irregulare Presl), A. macrodonta (Fee) Holttum (basi- nym: Dictyopteris macrodonta Presl ex Fee), A. brongniariii (Bory) Holttum (basinym: Polypodium brongniartii Bory), and A. gigantea (Ces.) Holttum (basinym: Nephrodium giganteum Ces.). 4s. Reductions to synonymy are: Aspidium difforme Blume to Arcypteris irre- gularis (Presl) Holtt., and Polypodium pteroides Presl to A. brongniartii (Bory) Holtt.
BOLBITIS NAGALANDENSE R. R. RAO & N. S. JAMIR A NEW SPECIES OF LOMARIOPSIDACEAE FROM NAGALAND, INDIA Rao, R. R.; JAMIR, N. S.
REINWARDTIA Vol 10, No 2 (1984): vol. 10 No.2
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (393.007 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v10i2.264

Abstract

An illustrated description of the new species Bo-lbitis nagalandense is presented
BERRYA ROXB. and CARPODIPTERA GRIS. kostermans, a. j. g. h.
REINWARDTIA Vol 7, No 5 (1969): vol 7.no.5
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (374.779 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v7i5.944

Abstract

In his monographic treatment of Tiliaceae, Burret {in Notizbl. bot.Gart. Berlin 9: 607. 1926) pointed out the close affinity of Berrya andCarpodiptera, the former represented in Asia and the Pacific area, thelatter from Africa and America.

Page 7 of 147 | Total Record : 1467

 5   6   7   8   9 

Filter by Year

1950 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Reinwardtia Vol 23, No 1 (2024): Volume 23, No 1 (2024): Reinwardtia Vol 23, No 2 (2024): Reinwardtia Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024) Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Volume 22, No 2 (2023): Reinwardtia Vol 22, No 1 (2023): Volume 22, No 1 (2023): Reinwardtia Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023) Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Reinwardtia Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022) Vol 21, No 1 (2022): Reinwardtia Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022) Vol 20, No 1 (2021): Vol. 20 No. 1 Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021) Vol 20, No 2 (2021): Reinwardtia Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021) Vol 19, No 2 (2020): Vol.19 No.2 Vol 19, No 1 (2020): Vol.19 No.1 Vol. 19 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020) Vol 18, No 2 (2019): Vol.18 No.2 Vol 18, No 1 (2019): Vol.18 No.1 Vol 18, No 1 (2019): Vol.18 No.1 Vol. 18 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2019) Vol 17, No 2 (2018): Vol.17 No.2 Vol 17, No 2 (2018): Vol.17 No.2 Vol 17, No 1 (2018): Vol.17 No.1 Vol 17, No 1 (2018): Vol.17 No.1 Vol. 17 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018) Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Vol 16 No. 2 Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Vol 16 No. 2 Vol 16, No 1 (2017): Vol.16 No.1 Vol 16, No 1 (2017): Vol.16 No.1 Vol. 16 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017) Vol 15, No 2 (2016): Vol.15 No.2 Vol 15, No 2 (2016): Vol.15 No.2 Vol 15, No 1 (2016): Vol.15 No.1 Vol 15, No 1 (2016): Vol.15 No.1 Vol. 15 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2016) Vol 14, No 2 (2015): Vol.14 No.2 Vol 14, No 2 (2015): Vol.14 No.2 Vol. 14 No. 2 (2015) Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Vol. 14 No. 1 Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Vol. 14 No. 1 Vol. 14 No. 1 (2014) Vol 13, No 5 (2013): Vol. 13, No. 5 Vol 13, No 5 (2013): Vol. 13, No. 5 Vol. 13 No. 5 (2013) Vol 13, No 4 (2012): Vol. 13 no. 4 Vol 13, No 4 (2012): Vol. 13 no. 4 Vol 13, No 3 (2012): Vol. 13 No. 3 Vol 13, No 3 (2012): Vol. 13 No. 3 Vol. 13 No. 4 (2012) Vol. 13 No. 3 (2012) Vol 13, No 2 (2010): Vol. 13 No. 2 Vol 13, No 2 (2010): Vol. 13 No. 2 Vol. 13 No. 2 (2010) Vol 13, No 1 (2009): Vol. 13 No. 1 Vol 13, No 1 (2009): Vol. 13 No. 1 Vol 12, No 5 (2009): Vol. 12, No. 5 Vol 12, No 5 (2009): Vol. 12, No. 5 Vol. 13 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 12 No. 5 (2009) Vol 12, No 4 (2008): Vol. 12, No. 4 Vol 12, No 4 (2008): Vol. 12, No. 4 Vol. 12 No. 4 (2008) Vol 12, No 3 (2006): Vol. 12, No. 3 Vol 12, No 3 (2006): Vol. 12, No. 3 Vol. 12 No. 3 (2006) Vol 12, No 2 (2004): Vol. 12, No. 2 Vol 12, No 2 (2004): Vol. 12, No. 2 Vol. 12 No. 2 (2004) Vol 12, No 1 (2002): Vol. 12, No. 1 Vol 12, No 1 (2002): Vol. 12, No. 1 Vol. 12 No. 1 (2002) Vol 11, No 5 (2000): Vol. 11 No. 5 Vol 11, No 5 (2000): Vol. 11 No. 5 Vol. 11 No. 5 (2000) Vol 11, No 4 (1999): Vol. 11 No. 4 Vol 11, No 4 (1999): Vol. 11 No. 4 Vol. 11 No. 4 (1999) Vol 11, No 3 (1998): Vol. 11 No. 3 Vol 11, No 3 (1998): Vol. 11 No. 3 Vol. 11 No. 3 (1998) Vol 11, No 2 (1997): Vol. 11 No. 2 Vol 11, No 2 (1997): Vol. 11 No. 2 Vol. 11 No. 2 (1997) Vol 11, No 1 (1992): Vol. 11 No. 1 Vol 11, No 1 (1992): Vol. 11 No. 1 Vol. 11 No. 1 (1992) Vol 10, No 5 (1988): vol. 10 No.5 Vol 10, No 5 (1988): vol. 10 No.5 Vol 10, No 4 (1988): vol. 10 No.4 Vol 10, No 4 (1988): vol. 10 No.4 Vol. 10 No. 5 (1988) Vol. 10 No. 4 (1988) Vol 10, No 3 (1987): vol. 10 No.3 Vol 10, No 3 (1987): vol. 10 No.3 Vol. 10 No. 3 (1987) Vol 10, No 2 (1984): vol. 10 No.2 Vol 10, No 2 (1984): vol. 10 No.2 Vol. 10 No. 2 (1984) Vol 10, No 1 (1982): vol. 10 No.1 Vol 10, No 1 (1982): vol. 10 No.1 Vol. 10 No. 1 (1982) Vol 9, No 4 (1980): vol.9 no.4 Vol 9, No 4 (1980): vol.9 no.4 Vol. 9 No. 4 (1980) Vol 9, No 3 (1977): vol.9 no.3 Vol 9, No 3 (1977): vol.9 no.3 Vol. 9 No. 3 (1977) Vol 9, No 2 (1975): vol.9 no.2 Vol 9, No 2 (1975): vol.9 no.2 Vol. 9 No. 2 (1975) Vol 9, No 1 (1974): Vol.9 no.1 Vol 9, No 1 (1974): Vol.9 no.1 Vol 8, No 4 (1974): vol.8 no.4 Vol 8, No 4 (1974): vol.8 no.4 Vol. 9 No. 1 (1974) Vol. 8 No. 4 (1974) Vol 8, No 3 (1972): vol.8 no.3 Vol 8, No 3 (1972): vol.8 no.3 Vol 8, No 2 (1972): vol.8 no.2 Vol 8, No 2 (1972): vol.8 no.2 Vol. 8 No. 3 (1972) Vol. 8 No. 2 (1972) Vol 8, No 1 (1970): vol.8 no.1 Vol 8, No 1 (1970): vol.8 no.1 Vol. 8 No. 1 (1970) Vol 7, No 5 (1969): vol 7.no.5 Vol 7, No 5 (1969): vol 7.no.5 Vol. 7 No. 5 (1969) Vol 7, No 4 (1968): vol.7 no.4 Vol 7, No 4 (1968): vol.7 no.4 Vol. 7 No. 4 (1968) Vol 7, No 3 (1966): vol.7 no.3 Vol 7, No 3 (1966): vol.7 no.3 Vol. 7 No. 3 (1966) Vol 7, No 2 (1965): vol.7 no.2 Vol 7, No 2 (1965): vol.7 no.2 Vol 7, No 1 (1965): vol.7 no.1 Vol 7, No 1 (1965): vol.7 no.1 Vol. 7 No. 2 (1965) Vol. 7 No. 1 (1965) Vol 6, No 4 (1963): vol.6 no. 4 Vol 6, No 4 (1963): vol.6 no. 4 Vol. 6 No. 4 (1963) Vol 6, No 3 (1962): vol.6 no. 3 Vol 6, No 3 (1962): vol.6 no. 3 Vol 6, No 2 (1962): vol.6 no. 2 Vol 6, No 2 (1962): vol.6 no. 2 Vol. 6 No. 3 (1962) Vol. 6 No. 2 (1962) Vol 6, No 1 (1961): vol.6 no. 1 Vol 6, No 1 (1961): vol.6 no. 1 Vol 5, No 4 (1961): vol.5 no.4 Vol 5, No 4 (1961): vol.5 no.4 Vol. 6 No. 1 (1961) Vol. 5 No. 4 (1961) Vol 5, No 3 (1960): vol.5 no.3 Vol 5, No 3 (1960): vol.5 no.3 Vol 5, No 2 (1960): vol.5 no.2 Vol 5, No 2 (1960): vol.5 no.2 Vol. 5 No. 3 (1960) Vol. 5 No. 2 (1960) Vol 5, No 1 (1959): vol.5 no.1 Vol 5, No 1 (1959): vol.5 no.1 Vol 4, No 4 (1959): vol.4 no.4 Vol 4, No 4 (1959): vol.4 no.4 Vol. 5 No. 1 (1959) Vol. 4 No. 4 (1959) Vol 4, No 3 (1958): vol.4 no.3 Vol 4, No 3 (1958): vol.4 no.3 Vol. 4 No. 3 (1958) Vol 4, No 2 (1957): vol.4 no.2 Vol 4, No 2 (1957): vol.4 no.2 Vol. 4 No. 2 (1957) Vol 4, No 1 (1956): vol.4 no.1 Vol 4, No 1 (1956): vol.4 no.1 Vol 3, No 4 (1956): vol.3 no.4 Vol 3, No 4 (1956): vol.3 no.4 Vol 3, No 3 (1956): vol.3 no.3 Vol 3, No 3 (1956): vol.3 no.3 Vol. 4 No. 1 (1956) Vol. 3 No. 4 (1956) Vol. 3 No. 3 (1956) Vol 3, No 2 (1955): vol.3 no.2 Vol 3, No 2 (1955): vol.3 no.2 Vol. 3 No. 2 (1955) Vol 3, No 1 (1954): vol.3 no.1 Vol 3, No 1 (1954): vol.3 no.1 Vol 2, No 3 (1954): vol.2 no.3 Vol 2, No 3 (1954): vol.2 no.3 Vol. 3 No. 1 (1954) Vol. 2 No. 3 (1954) Vol 2, No 2 (1953): vol.2 no.2 Vol 2, No 2 (1953): vol.2 no.2 Vol. 2 No. 2 (1953) Vol 2, No 1 (1952): vol.2 no.1 Vol 2, No 1 (1952): vol.2 no.1 Vol 1, No 4 (1952): vol.1 no.4 Vol 1, No 4 (1952): vol.1 no.4 Vol. 2 No. 1 (1952) Vol. 1 No. 4 (1952) Vol 1, No 3 (1951): vol.1 no.3 Vol 1, No 3 (1951): vol.1 no.3 Vol 1, No 2 (1951): vol.1 no.2 Vol 1, No 2 (1951): vol.1 no.2 Vol. 1 No. 3 (1951) Vol. 1 No. 2 (1951) Vol 1, No 1 (1950): vol.1 no.1 Vol 1, No 1 (1950): vol.1 no.1 Vol. 1 No. 1 (1950) More Issue