cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
maj@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Management Analysis Journal
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang
ISSN : 22526552     EISSN : 25021451     DOI : 10.15294/maj
Core Subject : Science,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management
Management Analysis Journal (MAJ) is an open-access electronic journal focusing on scientific work on the field of business. This journal applies the theory developed from business research and connects it to actual business situations. The articles within this journal are published quarterly (March, June, September, and December). This journal is maintained and issued by Departement of Management, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang. MAJ has been accredited by National Journal Accreditation (ARJUNA) Managed by Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, Republic Indonesia with Third Grade according to the decree No. 23/E/KPT/2019.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 3 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue " Vol 5 No 3 (2016): Management Analysis Journal" : 3 Documents clear
Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance terhadap Manajemen Laba pada Perusahaan yang Masuk dalam JII (Jakarta Islamic Index) Tahun 2012-2013 Sutino, Eva Rosa Dewi; Khoiruddin, Moh
Management Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 3 (2016): Management Analysis Journal
Publisher : Management Analysis Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/maj.v5i3.8274

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh good corporate governance terhadap manajemen laba. Good corporate governance diukur dengan indikator kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan manajerial, ukuran dewan komisaris, proporsi dewan komisaris independen, ukuran komite audit dan manajemen laba dihitung dengan discretionary accruals. Corporate governance merupakan konsep yang didasarkan pada teori keagenan yang diharapkan dapat menurunkan biaya keagenan dan meminimalisir manajemen laba. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dan menggunakan data sekunder yang diambil dengan teknik dokumentasi. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan yang masuk dalam JII selama 2012-2013. Sampel yang diambil melalui teknik purposive sampling berjumlah 38 data. Metode analisis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi berganda dengan bantuan program SPSS 20. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan manajerial, ukuran dewan komisaris dan ukuran komite audit tidak berpengaruh terhadap manajemen laba karena memiliki nilai signifikansi lebih dari 0,05. Sedangkan proporsi dewan komisaris independen memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap manajemen laba karena memiliki nilai signifikansi kurang dari 0,05. Saran yang berkaitan dengan hasil penelitian ini adalah dapat menambahkan periode penelitian lebih panjang untuk mengetahui konsistensi efek good corporate governance terhadap manajemen laba, membentuk dewan komisaris independen yang dapat menjalankan tanggung jawab dengan baik dan lebih teliti dalam membaca informasi keuangan sehingga dapat mengambil keputusan yang tepat untuk berinvestasi.
Pengaruh Ketidakamanan Kerja, Komitmen Organisasional dan Kepercayaan Organisasional pada Keinginan Berpindah nurudin, fadzilah; Martono, S
Management Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 3 (2016): Management Analysis Journal
Publisher : Management Analysis Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/maj.v5i3.9272

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of job insecurity, organizational commitment, and organizational trust on turnover intentions. The samples that were used in this study were 104 employees obtained by using the Slovin’s formula. The data were collected by using questionnaire method. The data analysis usespercentage descriptive analysis, and partial regression analysis uses SPSS for Windows version 16. The results of this study show that job insecurity influences turnover intentionspositively and significantly, while the organizational commitment and organizational trust influencenegatively and significantly. The study concluded that the higher job insecurity is, the higher turnover intentionswill be, and the higher commitment and organizational trust are, the lower turnover intentions will be. The suggestions from this study are to minimize job insecurity and turnover intentions and to increase the commitment and organizational trust, such as bythe availability of employee briefing-and-sharing with the leader, giving punishments if the employee resigns before the specified time period and giving rewards for employees with achievements.
Pengaruh Servant Leadership terhadap Kinerja Karyawan dengan Burnout sebagai Variabel Intervening Aji, Muhammad; Palupiningdyah, Palupiningdyah
Management Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 3 (2016): Management Analysis Journal
Publisher : Management Analysis Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/maj.v5i3.9754

Abstract

Human resource issues becomes the significant challenge for the company management. A new approach in leadership could simultaneously increase the employees personal growth and repair the quality and services. An effort to achieve that condition at the workplace is necessary to be applied by a leadership model known as servant leadership. This study aims to investigate the influence of self-leadership to the employee performance with bornout as the intervening variable on the employees of PT. Inti Roda Makmur Persada Tbk Tangerang. The population of this study is all the employees of PT. Inti Roda Makmur Persada Tbk Tangerang. Sampling technique using proportionate random sampling, there are 64 respondents. The methods of collecting the data are observation, questionnaires and literature. Data analysis using linear regression and line analysis. The result showed that t value is proved that servant leadership contributes positive and significant impact on the burnout. The second research results obtained proven that servant leadership gives positive influence and significant impact on the performance directly. The third result showed that burnout give negative effect And significant on the performance directly.  And the next result showed that servant leadership to performance by burnout give negative affect and significant.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 3

 1 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 4 (2023): Management Analysis Journal Vol 12 No 3 (2023): Management Analysis Journal Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Management Analysis Journal Vol 12 No 1 (2023): Management Analysis Journal Vol 11 No 4 (2022): Management Analysis Journal Vol 11 No 3 (2022): Management Analysis Journal Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Management Analysis Journal Vol 11 No 1 (2022): Management Analysis Journal Vol 10 No 4 (2021): Management Analysis Journal Vol 10 No 3 (2021): Management Analysis Journal Vol 10 No 2 (2021): Management Analysis Journal Vol 10 No 1 (2021): Management Analysis Journal Vol 9 No 4 (2020): Management Analysis Journal Vol 9 No 3 (2020): Management Analysis Journal Vol 9 No 2 (2020): Management Analysis Journal Vol 9 No 1 (2020): Management Analysis Journal Vol 8 No 4 (2019): Management Analysis Journal Vol 8 No 3 (2019): Management Analysis Journal Vol 8 No 2 (2019): Management Analysis Journal Vol 8 No 1 (2019): Management Analysis Journal Vol 7 No 4 (2018): Management Analysis Journal Vol 7 No 4 (2018): Management Analysis Journal Vol 7 No 3 (2018): Management Analysis Journal Vol 7 No 3 (2018): Management Analysis Journal Vol 7 No 2 (2018): Management Analysis Journal Vol 7 No 2 (2018): Management Analysis Journal Vol 7 No 1 (2018): Management Analysis Journal Vol 7 No 1 (2018): Management Analysis Journal Vol 6 No 4 (2017): Management Analysis Journal Vol 6 No 4 (2017): Management Analysis Journal Vol 6 No 3 (2017): Management Analysis Journal Vol 6 No 3 (2017): Management Analysis Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2017): Management Analysis Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2017): Management Analysis Journal Vol 6 No 1 (2017): Management Analysis Journal Vol 6 No 1 (2017): Management Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 4 (2016): Management Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 4 (2016): Management Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 4 (2016): Managemant Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 3 (2016): Management Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 3 (2016): Managemant Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 3 (2016): Management Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 2 (2016): Management Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 2 (2016): Management Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2016): Management Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2016): Management Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 4 (2015): Management Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 4 (2015): Management Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 3 (2015): Management Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 3 (2015): Management Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2015): Management Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2015): Management Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Management Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Management Analysis Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2014): Management Analysis Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2014): Management Analysis Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2014): Management Analysis Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2014): Management Analysis Journal Vol 2 No 2 (2013): Management Analysis Journal Vol 2 No 2 (2013): Management Analysis Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Management Analysis Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Management Analysis Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2012): Management Analysis Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2012): Management Analysis Journal Vol 1 No 1 (2012): Management Analysis Journal Vol 1 No 1 (2012): Management Analysis Journal More Issue