Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) I Made Kardiyasa; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.2.1.2020.78-82

Abstract

Hate speech in daily life people now such as expression, sedition, and provocation hate to other people and other community in many aspect such as religion, sex orientation, disabled, gender, racial , skin color, nationality and many else. If hate speech didn’t handle with effective way, efficient, and handle with corresponding with the valid law, so it can be impact social conflict that can increase discrimination action, violence and death loss. In this case there will be a bad impact which so danger for the hate speech victim, so in this case the writer’s get two solution to handle hate speech, that are protection law of hate speech victims and punishment criminal for the people who does hate speech. In this legal opinion writing, I am as a writer use normative method. In my experience, I do problem approach constitution which has related with hate speech, and then this research material reviewed. The result of this research is about law protective for the hate speech victims so that achievement can be protect them and the hate speech victims can feels safe. Hate speech can be says of criminal act because of what they have been done to hate speech victims. Unlawful actions that have been done with on propose or accidentally must be accounted for the acts that consist of constitution that happened and stated as acts that can be get a punishment in jail or fine. Ujaran kebencian dalam kehidupan manusia saat ini yang berupa ungkapan, hasutan, dan provokasi kebencian kepada seseorang atau suatu kelompok lain, dalam hal berbagai aspek berupa, agama, cacat, orientasi seksual, gender, ras, warna kulit, kewarganegaraan, dan lain-lain. Jika hate speech tidak di tangani dengan efektif, efesien dan ditangani sesuai hukum yang berlaku, bisa menimbulkan suatu dampak konflik sosial yang bisa memicu tindak diskriminasi, kekerasan dan atau penghilangan nyawa. Dengan timbulnya dampak yang sangat membahayakan bagi korban hate speech, maka penulis mendapatkan dua rumusan masalah dalam menangani hate speech yaitu, perlindungan hukum bagi korban hate speech dan sanksi pidana bagi pelaku hate speech. Penelitian ini mengunakan metode penulisan normative dan menggunakan pendekatan permasalahan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan hate speech Kemudian bahan penelitian di kaji. Hasil dari penelitian berupa perlindungan hukum bagi korban hate speech supaya tercapainya rasa aman dan dapat melindungi bagi mereka yang menjadi korban hate speech. Hate speech dapat dikatakan sebagai tindak pidana karena telah melakukan suatu Tindakan melawan hukum yang dilakukan dengan sengaja ataupun dengan tidak sengaja harus dipertanggungkawabkan atas tindakannnya berdasarkan undang-undang yang berlaku dan dinyatakan sebagai tindakan yang dapat dihukum kurungan atau denda.
Pembinaan Terhadap Narapidana Lanjut Usia Di Lapas Kelas II A Denpasar I Wayan Diva Adi Pradipta; I Ketut Sukadana; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.2.2.2020.209-214

Abstract

Lembaga Pemasyarakatan merupakan salah satu lembaga yang menegakkan hukum dalam hal pembinaan yang dilakukan terhadap para narapidana dimana segala jenis aturan yang dilakukan di dalam Lembaga Pemasyarakatan diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1995 tentang pemasyarakatan. Adapun rumusan masalah yang penulis kemukakan yaitu, (1) Bagaimana proses pembinaan narapidana lanjut usia di Lapas Kelas IIA Denpasar menurut UU No.12 Tahun 1995 Tentang Pemasyarakatan. (2) Apakah upaya penyelesaian terhadap kendala yang dihadapi dalam melakukan pembinaan pada narapidana lanjut usia di Lapas Kelas IIA Denpasar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode empiris dengan mengumpulkan data melalui wawancara di lapangan. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Denpasar yang terletak di daerah Kerobokan Kabupaten Badung. Hasil penelitian di lapangan didapat bahwa di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan yang menampung 1684 narapidana dengan klasifikasi 7 orang narapidana anak, 1663 orang narapidana dewasa serta 14 orang narapidana lansia ini telah memberikan perlakuan khusus kepada narapidana yang sudah lanjut usia karena para narapidana yang sudah lanjut usia tidak memiliki kemampuan yang cukup untuk melakukan segala kegiatan pembinaan yang seharusnya dilakukan, namun tidak ada peraturan khusus yang mengatur secara detail terkait hal tersebut. Memberikan perlakuan khusus dan membentuk aturan mengenai tata cara pembinaan terhadap narapidana yang sudah lanjut usia merupakan langkah yang wajib dilakukan agar terciptanya proses pembinaan terhadap para narapidana lanjut usia yang sesuai dengan kondisi narapidana lanjut usia itu sendiri.
Pertanggungjawaban dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Berkaitan Dengan Perdagangan Parsel Kadek Purwa Sastra Diyatmika; Ida Ayu Putu Widiati; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.2.3.2020.393-398

Abstract

Abstract—This is a consumer protection guarantee which should be by the consumer over any food products purchased from manufacturers or businessmen. For businessmen who just always worried about how to gain that much without thinking of the interests of consumers. It can be posed some problems that would constitute the subject of this research, the problem namely: 1) how form of liability in case of loss on consumers due to consume products in parcels. 2) how does the dispute resolution mechanism that creates consumer losses resulting from consuming products in parcels. This presentation method using empirical legal research, sociological issues in IE approach using an approach based on the provisions of the law and legal developments on a periodic basis. Liability in the event of the occurrence of harm on consumers due to consume products in parcel is a party – the party that made a mistake and led to losses. Parties – parties that are manufacturer, businessmen and parcel delivery service. Sanctions according to the civil code, namely compensation or administrative sanction and according to the criminal law, namely criminal confinement 5 years in prison. Consumers are dispute resolution mechanism gives rise to loss due to consume products in gifts can be made in litigation or non litigation. In trade parcels expected all parties to know about their respective responsibilities so that would not be incurred losses against consumers who consume parcels.
Praperadilan Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ilham Firdaus; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; NI Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.2.3.2020.366-371

Abstract

Abstract—Pretrial is the authority of the District Court about examining, deciding whether or not the arrest or detention is valid, whether or not the termination of the investigation or termination of the prosecution is legal, and the request for compensation or rehabilitation. The Constitutional Court has determined that new pretrial objects include the validity of the determination of suspects, searches and seizures. This research was conducted, namely to examine the challenges of the Court's decision Number 21 / PID.PRAP / 2017 / PN.DPS regarding the determination of the status of suspects in suspected corruption, while the problem is (1) on the basis of consideration of the judge who canceled the suspect's status? (2) What are the legal consequences of the pretrial decision? In this study, the author uses a normative legal research method and a statutory approach that uses a conceptual approach. The source of legal material is the primary legal material in the form of KUHAP, Law No. 20 of 2001, and Law No.48 of 2009, and secondary legal materials are literature and legal journals that have to do with problems, then analyzed qualitatively and presented in the form of analytical descriptive. The status of the suspect must be based on sufficient initial evidence or preliminary evidence, the provisions clearly stipulated by the Criminal Procedure Code. Determination of suspects in criminal acts of corruption must be proven by the existence of real state financial losses that have existed or arisen meaning, official audits issued by the BPK as a basis or reference to prove the existence of state financial losses (SEMA Number 4 in 2016). Proof and consideration see the absence or absence of sufficient initial evidence, it is not impossible due to the legal determination of the status of the suspect is not valid.