Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Implikasi hukum diskresi birokrasi terhadap penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi (studi kasus Thomas Trikasih Lembong dan La Nyalla Mattalitti) Nurman Sadam Bawono; Hadi Purnomo; Nugraha Pranadita
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/vh4jp671

Abstract

Penelitian ini berjudul Implikasi Hukum Diskresi Birokrasi terhadap Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi : Studi Kasus Thomas Trikasih Lembong dan La Nyalla Mahmud Mattalitti. Fokus penelitian adalah mengidentifikasi mengapa terdapat disparitas implikasi hukum antara dua kasus tersebut dan menentukan faktor-faktor dominan yang memengaruhi perbedaan itu. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif melalui studi kasus, analisis peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, dan kajian literatur terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan implikasi disebabkan oleh perbedaan penafsiran norma (legal interpretation), pembuktian unsur mens rea dan kerugian negara, paradigma penegakan hukum (formalistik vs. substantif-proporsional), konteks kelembagaan-politik, serta peran ahli dan media dalam membentuk opini publik. Kasus Tom Lembong cenderung dikualifikasikan sebagai penyalahgunaan wewenang dengan dampak kerugian negara, sementara kasus La Nyalla diputus bebas karena tidak terpenuhinya unsur niat jahat dan kerugian aktual. Kesimpulannya, penelitian merekomendasikan harmonisasi norma administrasi dan pidana, penguatan prinsip ultimum remedium, dan pedoman teknis bagi penegak hukum untuk mencegah kriminalisasi kebijakan administratif.
Crowdfunding Misuse as Cybercrime: A Criminal Law Perspective in Indonesia Nugraha Pranadita; Sungguh Raja Sembiring; Heddy Permana Putra; Yuninda Dwi Kartika; Yoga Gustiadi; Gede Indra Udayana
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1472

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has led to various innovations in the digital financial sector, one of which is crowdfunding. In principle, crowdfunding is a legitimate fundraising mechanism that provides social and economic benefits. However, in practice, crowdfunding is often misused as a means to commit cybercrime. Such misuse includes fictitious fundraising, misleading information, and the misappropriation of funds collected from the public. This study aims to analyze crowdfunding as a form of cybercrime from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that unlawful crowdfunding practices may fulfill the elements of criminal offenses, both as conventional fraud and as electronic-based crimes, thereby giving rise to criminal liability for perpetrators, including corporate entities. Therefore, stronger supervision, effective law enforcement, and enhanced digital legal literacy are essential to ensure legal protection for the public.
Peran Hukum Siber (Cyber Law) dalam Keamanan Transaksi e-Commerce di Indonesia Christian Dody Diori Marbun; Eka Pratama Putra; Rendra Gozali; Fawaid Abdul Qudus; Nugraha Pranadita
Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 6 No 1: April (2026)
Publisher : Arden Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57250/ajsh.v6i1.2334

Abstract

E-commerce di Indonesia berkembang pesat dan menjadi tulang punggung transaksi bisnis digital, namun memunculkan celah hukum serius berupa penipuan online, penyalahgunaan data pribadi, dan lemahnya penegakan hukum pada transaksi lintas batas. Walaupun Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) telah diterapkan sebagai landasan hukum untuk aktivitas digital, terdapat kesenjangan nyata antara norma hukum yang berlaku dan efektivitas perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen maupun pelaku usaha dalam praktiknya. Penelitian ini mengadopsi metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus. Data dihimpun melalui kajian pustaka terhadap regulasi hukum, khususnya UU ITE, literatur hukum ilmiah, serta putusan yang relevan dengan sengketa e-commerce. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa UU ITE   melalui pengakuan validitas kontrak elektronik, penetapan kewajiban pelaku usaha, perlindungan data pribadi, dan sanksi kejahatan siber   secara normatif telah membentuk kerangka perlindungan hukum yang memadai bagi transaksi e-commerce; namun terdapat kelemahan sistemik dalam implementasi dan penegakannya di lapangan. Kontribusi penelitian ini adalah pemetaan sistematis peran Cyber Law dalam ekosistem e-commerce Indonesia serta rekomendasi penguatan penegakan UU ITE sebagai instrumen kepastian hukum transaksi digital. Melalui penguatan pelaksanaan dan penegakan hukum yang berkelanjutan, UU ITE dapat meningkatkan kepercayaan masyarakat serta memastikan ekosistem e-commerce yang aman, jujur, dan bertanggung jawab.
Analisis Efektivitas Instrumen Hukum Lingkungan dalam Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia: Analysis of the Effectiveness of Environmental Legal Instruments in Sustainable Development in Indonesia Deny M. Ramdhany; Budiono; Dedi Junaedi; Jeny Mellysa Ariyanti; Edy Santoso; Nugraha Pranadita
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v1i2.51397

Abstract

Regulatory reforms in Indonesia including the Environmental Protection and Management Law, the risk-based licensing regime, and Government Regulation 22/2021create both opportunities and challenges for achieving sustainable development. This article analyzes the effectiveness of environmental law and maps its realization from upstream instruments (Strategic Environmental Assessment/SEA and Environmental Impact Assessment/EIA) to downstream mechanisms (monitoring and multi-track enforcement). The study employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, complemented by a policy-evaluation lens that links process indicators (EIA quality, public participation, oversight, administrative sanctions) to outcome indicators (ambient quality, land-cover change, pollution events). Findings indicate that: (i) post-approval oversight and progressive administrative sanctions strengthen compliance; (ii) high-quality EIA and meaningful participation enhance decision legitimacy and reduce dispute costs; (iii) information transparency reinforces accountability and scientific proof; (iv) civil and criminal tracks remain necessary for severe violations, while the polluter-pays principle and strict liability are effective if supported by robust damage-valuation guidance; (v) SEA functions as an upstream policy guardrail; and (vi) anti-SLAPP and citizen-lawsuit avenues broaden access to justice. The article’s novelty lies in an integrated evaluation framework that connects participation, transparency, and enforcement to measurable biophysical outcomes. Policy implications emphasize risk-based compliance assurance, strengthened environmental forensic laboratories, the use of remote sensing, independent audits, and routine public performance reporting across jurisdictions to drive continuous improvement
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Peran TNI dalam Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Berdasarkan Hukum Positif di Indonesia: A Legal Analysis of the Role of the Indonesian National Armed Forces in Environmental Protection and Management Based on Positive Law in Indonesia Aan Tirta Gandana; Agus Hendrayana; Dainsyah; Dian Amalia Dewi; Yudha Permana Sidiq; Edy Santoso; Nugraha Pranadita
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Siyasi
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v3i2.51456

Abstract

Environmental crimes in Indonesia are cross-sectoral and long-term, often exceeding the capacity of civilian enforcement and thus requiring limited support from the armed forces (TNI) under Military Operations Other Than War (OMSP). This article aims to: (1) map the TNI’s role in environmental law enforcement as a proportional supporting actor; (2) assess regulatory coherence and jurisdictional limits under Law No. 34/2004 (TNI) and Law No. 32/2009 (Environmental Protection and Management); and (3) propose an accountable evaluation matrix for TNI involvement. We employ a normative juridical method with statute, conceptual, and case approaches (Citarum Harum and the maritime domain), combined with policy analysis and document review (laws, presidential regulations, MoUs, strategic plans) triangulated with scholarly literature. Findings indicate that judicial authority remains with environmental civil investigators/police and prosecutors, while the TNI contributes to area/scene security, situational stabilization, mobilization, and logistics—subject to prompt handover, preserved chain of custody, and clear inter-agency SOPs. In the maritime domain, effectiveness hinges on interoperability and deconfliction; on land (forestry/mining), support is effective when paired with strengthened environmental forensics and investigator capacity. The novelty lies in a four-dimensional evaluation matrix (legal mandate & jurisdictional limits; operational roles & interoperability; forensic evidentiary quality; governance accountability & legitimacy) accompanied by guardrails to prevent overreach. Policy implications highlight the need for detailed secondary regulations on assistance tasks, collaborative performance indicators, and data transparency so that TNI involvement acts as a catalyst rather than a substitute for environmental law supremacy.