Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary on Social and Technology Rechtsvinding PALAR : Pakuan Law Review
Dedi Wardana Nasoetion
Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementation of the Rights of Justice Collaborators to Get Reduced Sentences in the Crime of Murder Dany Ardiansah Putra; Wahyu Prawesthi; Dedi Wardana Nasoetion
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1423

Abstract

The concept of a Justice Collaborator (JC) has become an important instrument in criminal law enforcement, particularly in uncovering complex crimes. A justice collaborator refers to a perpetrator who cooperates with law enforcement authorities by providing significant information to reveal a criminal act and identify other perpetrators. In Indonesia, the recognition of justice collaborators is regulated in Law Number 13 of 2006 as amended by Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims, as well as Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 4 of 2011. This study examines the implementation of the rights of justice collaborators to obtain sentence reduction in cases of murder and analyzes the legal considerations applied by judges in granting such leniency. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials consist of relevant laws and regulations, while secondary materials include legal doctrines and scholarly articles. The data are analyzed qualitatively through descriptive analysis. The results indicate that although justice collaborators are legally entitled to special protection and the possibility of sentence reduction, their implementation in murder cases is not automatic and depends heavily on judicial discretion. Judges consider several factors, including the significance of the information provided, the role of the offender in the crime, and the consistency of cooperation during the investigation and trial process. The study concludes that clearer legal standards and consistent judicial application are necessary to ensure legal certainty and fairness in granting sentence reductions to justice collaborators in murder cases.
The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Tipiring Cases as an Effort to Reduce Suspects in Detention Dani Kurniawan; Dedi Wardana Nasoetion; M. Syahrul Borman
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1438

Abstract

This study examines the application of restorative justice in handling minor criminal offenses as an effort to reduce the number of detainees in detention centers. The current handling of minor offenses in Indonesia is often considered disproportionate, as imprisonment is frequently imposed despite the relatively small impact of such crimes. This situation contributes to overcrowding in correctional institutions and increases the burden on the criminal justice system. Restorative justice offers an alternative approach that emphasizes dialogue, mediation, and reconciliation between the offender and the victim in order to restore the social relationship that has been disrupted by the crime. This research employs a normative juridical method by analyzing relevant laws, regulations, and legal literature concerning the implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia. The findings indicate that restorative justice can provide a more effective, humane, and efficient solution in resolving minor criminal cases. Through this approach, victims can obtain compensation and a sense of justice, while offenders are given the opportunity to take responsibility and reintegrate into society without the negative stigma of imprisonment. Therefore, restorative justice can serve as an important instrument in reducing the number of detainees and improving the effectiveness of the criminal justice system in Indonesia
Wewenang Satuan Samapta Polres Mojokerto Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Ringan Muhammad Alvino Reko Hafsah; Hartoyo Hartoyo; Dedi Wardana Nasoetion
Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary on Social and Technology Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli - Oktober
Publisher : PT Ilmu Data Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69693/ijmst.v4i3.11319

Abstract

Penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana ringan merupakan bagian penting dari tugas Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia dalam menjaga keamanan dan ketertiban masyarakat. Satuan Samapta Polres Mojokerto memiliki peran strategis sebagai unit kepolisian yang berada di garis depan dalam merespons gangguan keamanan dan ketertiban masyarakat, termasuk tindak pidana ringan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan hukum Satuan Samapta Polres Mojokerto dalam penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana ringan serta mekanisme pelaksanaannya berdasarkan standar operasional prosedur yang berlaku. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif Satuan Samapta memiliki kedudukan hukum yang sah berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia serta Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2021. Kewenangan yang dimiliki bersifat preventif dan represif terbatas, terutama dalam melakukan tindakan kepolisian awal terhadap tindak pidana ringan di lapangan. Mekanisme penegakan hukum dilakukan melalui patroli, respons terhadap laporan masyarakat, tindakan awal di tempat kejadian perkara, pendataan, serta koordinasi dan pelimpahan perkara kepada satuan penyidik yang berwenang. Namun demikian, pelaksanaan di lapangan masih menghadapi kendala dalam penggunaan diskresi kepolisian dan koordinasi antar satuan fungsi, sehingga diperlukan penguatan pengaturan kewenangan agar pelaksanaan penegakan hukum lebih konsisten dan efektif.
The Legal Liability of Local Governments in Disputes Over Athlete Bonus Payments Muhammad Bara’ Ramadhan M; Wahyu Prawesthi; Muhammad Yustino Aribawa; Dedi Wardana Nasoetion
PALAR | PAKUAN LAW REVIEW Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): Volume 12, Number 2 April-June 2026
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v12i2.112

Abstract

This study examines the legal liability of local governments for failing to fulfil promised bonus payments to athletes. This issue arises because, while bonuses are promised as recognition of athletes’ achievements, in practice, payments are often delayed or fail to materialise. The objective of this legal study is to describe and explain in detail and fundamentally that, based on the principle of legal certainty, the principles of good governance, and statutory provisions, local governments can be held legally liable for breach of contract or negligence in fulfilling promises to pay athlete bonuses. This study is a normative, descriptive-analytical research study, utilising secondary data through a literature review and qualitative data analysis. The results of the study indicate that athlete bonuses promised by local governments carry binding legal and administrative consequences once formalised in policies, decisions, or local budgets. Therefore, athletes, as aggrieved parties, are entitled to legal protection through administrative mechanisms or legal action in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.   Keywords: Accountability, Government, Bonuses, Athletes, Disputes.
Co-Authors Dani Kurniawan Dany Ardiansah Putra Hartoyo Hartoyo M. Syahrul Borman Muhammad Alvino Reko Hafsah Muhammad Bara’ Ramadhan M Muhammad Yustino Aribawa Wahyu Prawesthi