Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Association Between Spatial Justice Indicators and Perceived Quality of Life Among Residents of Post-Industrial Urban Neighborhoods in Palembang, Indonesia Napitupulu, Christian; Amanda, Vita; Yermekova, Aylin
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher in collaboration with CMHC Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v9i2.321

Abstract

Background: Urbanization and post-industrial transitions create spatial inequities that may influence residents’ perceived quality of life. Objective: To examine associations between spatial justice indicators and perceived quality of life among residents of post-industrial neighborhoods in Palembang, Indonesia. Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study included 384 adults from three neighborhoods. Validated questionnaires assessed access to green space, healthcare, public transport, and community centres, together with neighborhood safety, social cohesion, governance participation, and adapted WHOQOL-BREF scores. Multivariate logistic regression was used. Results: Good quality of life was reported by 289 participants (75.3%). High spatial justice (aOR=3.49; 95% CI 2.25–5.43), high governance participation (aOR=2.59; 95% CI 1.85–3.62), green-space access (aOR=2.12), healthcare access (aOR=2.01), neighborhood safety (aOR=1.85), and social cohesion (aOR=1.68) were significant predictors. Model fit was adequate (Hosmer–Lemeshow p=0.684; Nagelkerke R²=0.348). Conclusion: Spatial justice, participatory governance, safety, and social cohesion were independently associated with better perceived quality of life in post-industrial communities.
Association Between Spatial Justice Indicators and Perceived Quality of Life Among Residents of Post-Industrial Urban Neighborhoods in Palembang, Indonesia Napitupulu, Christian; Amanda, Vita; Yermekova, Aylin
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher in collaboration with CMHC Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v9i2.321

Abstract

Background: Urbanization and post-industrial transitions create spatial inequities that may influence residents’ perceived quality of life. Objective: To examine associations between spatial justice indicators and perceived quality of life among residents of post-industrial neighborhoods in Palembang, Indonesia. Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study included 384 adults from three neighborhoods. Validated questionnaires assessed access to green space, healthcare, public transport, and community centres, together with neighborhood safety, social cohesion, governance participation, and adapted WHOQOL-BREF scores. Multivariate logistic regression was used. Results: Good quality of life was reported by 289 participants (75.3%). High spatial justice (aOR=3.49; 95% CI 2.25–5.43), high governance participation (aOR=2.59; 95% CI 1.85–3.62), green-space access (aOR=2.12), healthcare access (aOR=2.01), neighborhood safety (aOR=1.85), and social cohesion (aOR=1.68) were significant predictors. Model fit was adequate (Hosmer–Lemeshow p=0.684; Nagelkerke R²=0.348). Conclusion: Spatial justice, participatory governance, safety, and social cohesion were independently associated with better perceived quality of life in post-industrial communities.
Digital Government Maturity and Public Service Performance in Indonesia: A Three-Wave Ordinal Panel Study of Level Versus Within-Unit Change Pratama, Alex Putra; Yermekova, Aylin
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher in collaboration with CMHC Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v9i4.331

Abstract

Background: Digital government maturity is assumed to raise public service quality, but longitudinal subnational evidence is scarce and rarely separates whether well-digitised governments simply perform better from whether becoming more digitised makes a government perform better. Objective: To estimate the association between within-entity change in electronic government maturity and the ordered transition in public service performance predicate among Indonesian local governments, and to distinguish that estimand from the lagged-level association. Methods: Two Indonesian national open datasets for 2023–2025 were linked on normalised agency names: the Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) maturity index and the Indeks Pelayanan Publik (IPP) performance index. Guided by technology enactment theory, 194 consecutive annual transitions from 135 entities within 665 entity-year observations were modelled with cumulative-link proportional-odds regression adjusted for baseline IPP, interval, and government level, with entity-clustered robust standard errors. Results: The adjusted odds ratio for a better IPP transition per 0.5-point SPBE gain was 1.400 (95% CI 0.780–2.513; p = 0.261; Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p = 0.420); proportional odds held for the exposure (p = 0.914). The first difference was null (β = 0.003; 95% CI −0.085–0.091; p = 0.953), whereas SPBE level predicted the following year's IPP score (β = 0.195; 95% CI 0.079–0.312; p = 0.001; adjusted p = 0.006). The design could detect only odds ratios of 2.31 or larger at 80% power. Conclusion: Digital maturity and assessed service performance appear jointly produced by durable institutional capacity rather than by annual increments in digitisation. Assessment coverage moved by more than 40% between adjacent waves, so Indonesia's evaluation infrastructure must be stabilised before causal claims can be tested.
Digital Government Maturity and Public Service Performance in Indonesia: A Three-Wave Ordinal Panel Study of Level Versus Within-Unit Change Pratama, Alex Putra; Yermekova, Aylin
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher in collaboration with CMHC Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v9i4.331

Abstract

Background: Digital government maturity is assumed to raise public service quality, but longitudinal subnational evidence is scarce and rarely separates whether well-digitised governments simply perform better from whether becoming more digitised makes a government perform better. Objective: To estimate the association between within-entity change in electronic government maturity and the ordered transition in public service performance predicate among Indonesian local governments, and to distinguish that estimand from the lagged-level association. Methods: Two Indonesian national open datasets for 2023–2025 were linked on normalised agency names: the Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) maturity index and the Indeks Pelayanan Publik (IPP) performance index. Guided by technology enactment theory, 194 consecutive annual transitions from 135 entities within 665 entity-year observations were modelled with cumulative-link proportional-odds regression adjusted for baseline IPP, interval, and government level, with entity-clustered robust standard errors. Results: The adjusted odds ratio for a better IPP transition per 0.5-point SPBE gain was 1.400 (95% CI 0.780–2.513; p = 0.261; Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p = 0.420); proportional odds held for the exposure (p = 0.914). The first difference was null (β = 0.003; 95% CI −0.085–0.091; p = 0.953), whereas SPBE level predicted the following year's IPP score (β = 0.195; 95% CI 0.079–0.312; p = 0.001; adjusted p = 0.006). The design could detect only odds ratios of 2.31 or larger at 80% power. Conclusion: Digital maturity and assessed service performance appear jointly produced by durable institutional capacity rather than by annual increments in digitisation. Assessment coverage moved by more than 40% between adjacent waves, so Indonesia's evaluation infrastructure must be stabilised before causal claims can be tested.