Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Euphemism And Social Prejudice In The 2024 Presidential Debate: Anies’s Rhetoric Toward Prabowo Inayatur Rosyidah; Bisri Mustofa; Muhamad Rofik Fitrotulloh; Efy S.Atanjuani
INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : FAKULTAS DAKWAH UIN SALATIGA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/inject.v10i1.4349

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze euphemistic expressions that reflect social prejudice in the 2024 Indonesian presidential debate, specifically those used by Anies Baswedan in reference to Prabowo Subianto. The study is significant in revealing how linguistic strategies are employed in political communication to deliver implicit yet ideologically charged criticism. Adopting a qualitative descriptive method within an ethnocommunicative framework, data were collected through passive participatory observation, note-taking, and documentation of debate recordings and transcripts. The data were analyzed using content analysis in five stages: problem formulation, theoretical framework development, methodological design, application of analytical techniques (classification, semantic interpretation, and contextual inference), and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that Anies Baswedan employed three types of euphemism—underspecification, overstatement, and understatement (litotes)—to express negative evaluations containing various forms of social prejudice, including stereotyping, social judgment, and antilocution.
Integrating Zakat and Waqf for Sustainable Food Security: An Islamic Social Finance Perspective from Indonesia Mohamad Ainun Najib; Efy Setiawati Atanjuani; Nurul Fadhilah
Syi`ar Iqtishadi : Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance and Banking Vol 10, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : FEB Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35448/jiec.v10i1.40793

Abstract

This study examines food security as a systemic and institutional issue and analyzes the role of Islamic social finance, particularly zakat and waqf, as an integrated solution within the Indonesian context. This research employs a qualitative approach based on library research using food systems and institutional economics perspectives. The analysis draws upon classical and contemporary literature on food security, zakat, and waqf relevant to Indonesia. The study finds that food insecurity in Indonesia is primarily driven by unequal access, institutional weaknesses, and the limitations of market-based financing rather than by insufficient food production alone. Zakat functions as a social protection instrument that safeguards food access and consumption among vulnerable groups, while waqf serves as a long-term asset-based financing mechanism that supports food production, stability, and sustainability. Therefore, sustainable food security cannot be achieved through zakat or waqf independently, but rather through their institutional integration. This study reconceptualizes Islamic social finance from a philanthropic approach into a strategic institutional framework for sustainable food security.