Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

An Analysis of the Intertextuality of Nasikh wa Mansukh Between the Qur’an and Hadith: Epistemological Issues in the Formation of Islamic Law Muhammad Idil Fitri; Rendy Shaputra; Supriadi Hamid; Amir Hamzah
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 11 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20407249

Abstract

This study examines the concept of nasikh wa mansukh between the Qur’an and Hadith with a focus on epistemological problems in the formulation of Islamic law. The debate regarding the possibility of Hadith abrogating the Qur’an reflects differences among scholars concerning textual authority, transmission validity, and methods of interpreting revelation. Some scholars accept the concept under the condition that the Hadith is mutawatir, while others reject it because the Qur’an is considered the highest source of Islamic law. This research employs a qualitative approach using library research methods. Data were collected from literature on Qur’anic studies, ushul fiqh, Hadith, and contemporary Islamic thought. The analysis applies descriptive-analytical, intertextual, and Islamic epistemological approaches. The findings show that the relationship between the Qur’an and Hadith in the concept of abrogation is influenced by differing epistemological paradigms. Scholars who accept abrogation emphasize the unity of revelation, while those who reject it emphasize differences in textual authority and validity. The study also finds that many claims of abrogation can be understood through textual harmonization, contextual legal interpretation, and maqashid al-shariah approaches without literal annulment of legal rulings. Therefore, the concept of nasikh wa mansukh should be understood contextually and integratively to remain relevant in contemporary Islamic legal methodology.
Otoritas Epistemik Tafsir Sahabat dalam Studi Ulūm al-Qur’ān: Analisis Sumber dan Kehujahan Mursalin Mursalin; Halimah Basri; Amir Hamzah
Hamalatul Qur'an : Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Alqur'an Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Juni 2026
Publisher : Pondok Pesantren Hamalatul Qur'an Jogoroto Jombang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37985/hq.v7i1.944

Abstract

Perdebatan mengenai keabsahan penafsiran sahabat tetap menjadi isu sentral dalam kajian ‘Ulūm al-Qur’an, khususnya pada titik temu antara perspektif tradisional yang mutlak dengan metode analitis kontemporer. Situasi ini memerlukan konstruksi epistemik yang tegas agar tafsir sahabat dapat diposisikan secara seimbang. Metodologi penelitian ini menggunakan kualitatif berbasis kajian literatur dengan kerangka ilmiah yang runtut, melalui penelusuran sumber pokok berupa kitab ‘Ulūm al-Qur’an dan bahan sekunder yang berkaitan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merumuskan definisi tafsir sahabat, mengidentifikasi sumber-sumber epistemiknya, serta menganalisis legalitas dan tingkat kehujahannya dalam tradisi tafsir. Hasil riset menunjukkan bahwa tafsir sahabat tergolong tafsīr bi al-ma’tsūr yang bersumber dari Al-Qur’an, hadis, ijtihad, serta dalam kadar tertentu riwayat ahli kitab. Dari segi kehujahan, tafsir sahabat terbagi menjadi marfū‘ yang bersifat otoritatif dan wajib diterima, serta mauqūf yang bersifat ijtihādī dan menjadi objek perbedaan pendapat. Otoritas tafsir sahabat dengan demikian tidak bersifat mutlak, melainkan kontekstual. Implikasi penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya pendekatan kritis-proporsional dalam penggunaan tafsir sahabat, sekaligus menawarkan kerangka epistemologis yang lebih sistematis sebagai jembatan antara pendekatan tradisional dan modern dalam studi tafsir.