Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsvinding Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory
Iwan Darmawan
Universitas Pakuan
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Dispute Resolution Through Local Institutional Mechanisms in the Baduy Indigenous People and Their Relevance to National Legal Pluralism Muhammad Tahsin Roy; Iwan Darmawan; Mahipal Mahipal
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1828

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dispute resolution mechanism through local institutions in the Baduy indigenous people and its relevance to national legal pluralism in Indonesia. On the one hand, the Baduy customary mechanism based on the philosophy of pikukuh and the concept of mutual forgiveness has proven to be effective in resolving conflicts quickly, participatoryly, and oriented towards restoring social-spiritual harmony at no cost. However, on the other hand, its implementation faces structural and normative challenges when interacting with the formal justice system, such as the lack of documentation of decisions, the lack of standardized due process, and the potential for overlapping jurisdictions. This study uses a normative-empirical legal approach with a qualitative case study method, through the analysis of regulatory documents, literature reviews, and in-depth interviews with key sources. The results of the study show that the local institutions of Baduy are in substantive harmony with the principles of restorative justice and preventive legal protection, but their constitutional recognition is still partial at the field level. This study recommends a complementary harmonization model that includes: (1) declarative registration of customary decisions as a peace deed in the District Court, (2) the preparation of institutional collaboration protocols (MoU/Joint Decree), (3) joint training on the principles of restorative justice and human rights, and (4) continuous legal assistance. Thus, the coexistence of customary law and national law can be realized in a healthy manner without sacrificing cultural autonomy and guarantees of human rights protection.
Tinjauan Yuridis Sosiologis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Contempt Of Court Terkait Kebebasan Berpendapat Dalam Menjaga Lembaga Peradilan Di Indonesia Ervina Husnaini; Iwan Darmawan; Nandang Kusnadi
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : SPT. haria Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v4i3.2019

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana contempt of court, penerapan sanksi dalam sistem hukum Indonesia, serta kendala dan upaya penanggulangannya dalam menjaga kewibawaan lembaga peradilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan empiris melalui studi terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan dan wawancara dengan aparat penegak hukum serta masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa contempt of court merupakan perbuatan yang dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana apabila memenuhi unsur tindak pidana, yaitu perbuatan melawan hukum, kesalahan, dan kemampuan bertanggung jawab. Meskipun kebebasan berpendapat dijamin oleh konstitusi, pelaksanaannya tidak bersifat absolut dan memiliki batasan hukum. Namun demikian, penegakkan hukum terhadap contempt of court masih belum optimal karena belum adanya pengaturan khusus pada saat KUHP lama, oleh karena itu pengaturannya belum komprehensi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan peninjauan ulang terhadap pasal yang multitafsir dalam KUHP Baru, pemerintah perlu memfasilitasi terhadap peraturan baru di KUHP Baru mengenai contempt of court, serta penegakkan hukum yang konsisten.
Co-Authors Ervina Husnaini Mahipal Mahipal Muhammad Tahsin Roy Nandang Kusnadi