Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Dr: Perbandingan Antara Moderasi Dan Wasathiyah Dalam Tinjauan Pendidikan Islam Ali Muddin Jailani; Bambang Supradi
Ikhtisar: Jurnal Pengetahuan Islam Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Ikhtisar: Jurnal Pengetahuan Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sumatera Barat Pariaman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55062/ijpi.v6i1.1151

Abstract

Some scholars tend to equate the concept of moderation with wasathiyah, although the two differ in terms of definition, conceptual background, and implementation. This study employs a literature review approach using content analysis, applied flexibly through conceptual construction analysis. The findings indicate that moderation and wasathiyah share several commonalities, yet also reveal fundamental differences in terms of their definitions, epistemological foundations, and underlying values. The concept of religious moderation has developed within the context of modern thought that emphasizes universal values as its primary foundation, whereas the concept of wasathiyah is rooted in Islamic teachings derived from revelation and possesses a universal orientation in its application. In the context of Islamic education, the concept of wasathiyah education is viewed as having closer relevance to the framework of Islamic educational values compared to the term religious moderation. Wasathiyah education implies the formation of students’ understanding, attitudes, and behavior grounded in revelatory values.
Mapping the Discursive Barriers of Religious Moderation in Islamic Schools: A Systematic Literature Review of Sinta-Indexed Research (2019–2026) Bambang Supradi; Ali Muddin Jailani; Mustafa Mustafa; Syahrur Ramli; M Yoga Habibullah; Yudha Putra Pratama; Radhitiya Dwi Putra
JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): December
Publisher : Yayasan Darussalam Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62159/jpi.v5i3.2236

Abstract

This systematic literature review investigates the structural and discursive barriers hindering the implementation of state-led religious moderation policies in Indonesian Islamic schools (Madrasahs). Utilizing the PRISMA framework to analyze 35 selected articles from Sinta-indexed journals published between 2019 and 2026, the study maps the implementation bottlenecks into three primary problem clusters: ideological-epistemological resistance, pedagogical-curricular constraints, and institutional policy ambiguities. The findings reveal a profound structural paradox: rather than fostering genuine civic tolerance, the top-down imposition of standardized moderation modules inadvertently triggers a defensive theological response from frontline educators. Driven by fears of 'theological dilution' (pendangkalan akidah) and burdened by rigid administrative compliance metrics, schools frequently resort to institutional decoupling—displaying superficial symbols of compliance while maintaining traditional, exclusionary classroom dynamics. Furthermore, a resource-driven divide exacerbates systemic inequalities between wealthy urban institutions and underfunded rural schools, forcing the latter to rely on informal, localized religious networks that fracture national standardization. This review argues that the current securitized, state-imposed approach destroys pedagogical trust and alienates educators. To overcome this impasse, policymakers must transition from punitive bureaucratic mandates toward a collaborative governance model that re-centers educational autonomy and utilizes traditional Islamic frameworks like wasathiyah.