Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal El-Thawalib DIRAYAH : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Jurnal El-Thawalib
Zira Shafira
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
HERMENEUTIKA DIALEKTIS OTENTISITAS HADIS: REKONSTRUKSI EPISTEMOLOGI INTEGRATIF JOSEPH SCHACHT DAN MUḤAMMAD MUṢṬAFĀ AL-A‘ẒAMĪ Zira Shafira; Hifsa Nurrahim; Uli Nashrul Lathifi; Syahru Nur Zaman; M. Rajib Habiburrahman
DIRAYAH : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Vol. 6 No. 02 (2026): DIRAYAH: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an (STIQ) Ar-Rahman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62359/dirayah.v6i02.1352

Abstract

The debate on the authenticity of hadith between Joseph Schacht and Muḥammad Muṣṭafā al-A‘ẓamī represents a fundamental friction between Western historical-critical approaches and traditional Islamic internal authentication. This study aims to analytically explore the philosophical foundations, methodological convergences, and divergences of both scholars. Employing library research and content analysis, this study adopts Paul Ricoeur’s dialectical hermenutics framework, which juxtaposes the hermeneutics of suspicion and the hermeneutics of faith. The results indicate that Schacht’s paradigm functions as a hermeneutics of suspicion through deconstructive instruments such as back-projection and argumentum e silentio. Conversely, al-A‘ẓamī’s methodology embodies a hermeneutics of faith that restores textual authority through internal transmission devices (isnād cum matn) and first-century AH documentary evidence. The novelty of this study lies in its synthesis of an integrative isnād-historical epistemological model that reconfigures Western critical analysis as an external control mechanism, while preserving the traditional isnād coherence as the primary internal control core. This study implies that the integrative model serves as a robust framework for epistemic decolonization in contemporary Islamic studies and offers a layered verification mechanism to address information validity crises in the digital era.
Raḥmān and Raḥīm in the Qur'an and the Bible: An Intertextual Reading through Julia Kristeva's Theory Zahratul Farhah; Anwar Fahmi; Zira Shafira; Hifsa Nurrahim; Fadhal Al-Khalidi
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 4 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i4.20817

Abstract

This study examines the intertextuality of the concepts of God’s compassion and mercy through the terms al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm in the Qur’an and raḥûm in the Bible. This study is qualitative in nature, taking the form of a literature review that employs Julia Kristeva’s approach to intertextuality combined with historical analysis. Primary data include Q.S Al-Fatihah/1:1 and 3, Q.S An-Nisa/4:1, Q.S Hud/11:90, and Q.S Al-Zumar/39:53 from the Qur’an, as well as Exodus 34:6, Deuteronomy 4:31, Psalm 78:38, and Isaiah 49:15 from the Bible. Secondary data consists of exegetical works, Arabic and Hebrew lexicons, biblical commentaries, and literature on the theory of intertextuality. Data were collected through documentation, inventory, contextual classification, and the selection of representative verses, then analyzed descriptively and analytically by identifying conceptual similarities, transformations of meaning, and intertextual dialogue. The results of this study indicate that the relationship between raḥûm and al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm extends beyond their shared root, r-ḥ-m, as well as meanings such as compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and the nurturing of God’s relationship with humanity. However, through a process of intertextuality, the Qur’an does not merely repeat the concept of raḥûm but transforms, expands, and modifies its meaning in accordance with its own theological framework. Thus, intertextuality signifies a dialogue with earlier traditions without undermining the Qur’an’s framework of meaning
Raḥmān and Raḥīm in the Qur'an and the Bible: An Intertextual Reading through Julia Kristeva's Theory Zahratul Farhah; Anwar Fahmi; Zira Shafira; Hifsa Nurrahim; Fadhal Al-Khalidi
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 4 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i4.20817

Abstract

This study examines the intertextuality of the concepts of God’s compassion and mercy through the terms al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm in the Qur’an and raḥûm in the Bible. This study is qualitative in nature, taking the form of a literature review that employs Julia Kristeva’s approach to intertextuality combined with historical analysis. Primary data include Q.S Al-Fatihah/1:1 and 3, Q.S An-Nisa/4:1, Q.S Hud/11:90, and Q.S Al-Zumar/39:53 from the Qur’an, as well as Exodus 34:6, Deuteronomy 4:31, Psalm 78:38, and Isaiah 49:15 from the Bible. Secondary data consists of exegetical works, Arabic and Hebrew lexicons, biblical commentaries, and literature on the theory of intertextuality. Data were collected through documentation, inventory, contextual classification, and the selection of representative verses, then analyzed descriptively and analytically by identifying conceptual similarities, transformations of meaning, and intertextual dialogue. The results of this study indicate that the relationship between raḥûm and al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm extends beyond their shared root, r-ḥ-m, as well as meanings such as compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and the nurturing of God’s relationship with humanity. However, through a process of intertextuality, the Qur’an does not merely repeat the concept of raḥûm but transforms, expands, and modifies its meaning in accordance with its own theological framework. Thus, intertextuality signifies a dialogue with earlier traditions without undermining the Qur’an’s framework of meaning
Co-Authors ANWAR FAHMI Fadhal Al-Khalidi Hifsa Nurrahim M. Rajib Habiburrahman Syahru Nur Zaman Uli Nashrul Lathifi Zahratul Farhah