Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal El-Thawalib Jurnal El-Thawalib
Fadhal Al-Khalidi
UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Raḥmān and Raḥīm in the Qur'an and the Bible: An Intertextual Reading through Julia Kristeva's Theory Zahratul Farhah; Anwar Fahmi; Zira Shafira; Hifsa Nurrahim; Fadhal Al-Khalidi
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 4 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i4.20817

Abstract

This study examines the intertextuality of the concepts of God’s compassion and mercy through the terms al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm in the Qur’an and raḥûm in the Bible. This study is qualitative in nature, taking the form of a literature review that employs Julia Kristeva’s approach to intertextuality combined with historical analysis. Primary data include Q.S Al-Fatihah/1:1 and 3, Q.S An-Nisa/4:1, Q.S Hud/11:90, and Q.S Al-Zumar/39:53 from the Qur’an, as well as Exodus 34:6, Deuteronomy 4:31, Psalm 78:38, and Isaiah 49:15 from the Bible. Secondary data consists of exegetical works, Arabic and Hebrew lexicons, biblical commentaries, and literature on the theory of intertextuality. Data were collected through documentation, inventory, contextual classification, and the selection of representative verses, then analyzed descriptively and analytically by identifying conceptual similarities, transformations of meaning, and intertextual dialogue. The results of this study indicate that the relationship between raḥûm and al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm extends beyond their shared root, r-ḥ-m, as well as meanings such as compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and the nurturing of God’s relationship with humanity. However, through a process of intertextuality, the Qur’an does not merely repeat the concept of raḥûm but transforms, expands, and modifies its meaning in accordance with its own theological framework. Thus, intertextuality signifies a dialogue with earlier traditions without undermining the Qur’an’s framework of meaning
Raḥmān and Raḥīm in the Qur'an and the Bible: An Intertextual Reading through Julia Kristeva's Theory Zahratul Farhah; Anwar Fahmi; Zira Shafira; Hifsa Nurrahim; Fadhal Al-Khalidi
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 4 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i4.20817

Abstract

This study examines the intertextuality of the concepts of God’s compassion and mercy through the terms al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm in the Qur’an and raḥûm in the Bible. This study is qualitative in nature, taking the form of a literature review that employs Julia Kristeva’s approach to intertextuality combined with historical analysis. Primary data include Q.S Al-Fatihah/1:1 and 3, Q.S An-Nisa/4:1, Q.S Hud/11:90, and Q.S Al-Zumar/39:53 from the Qur’an, as well as Exodus 34:6, Deuteronomy 4:31, Psalm 78:38, and Isaiah 49:15 from the Bible. Secondary data consists of exegetical works, Arabic and Hebrew lexicons, biblical commentaries, and literature on the theory of intertextuality. Data were collected through documentation, inventory, contextual classification, and the selection of representative verses, then analyzed descriptively and analytically by identifying conceptual similarities, transformations of meaning, and intertextual dialogue. The results of this study indicate that the relationship between raḥûm and al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm extends beyond their shared root, r-ḥ-m, as well as meanings such as compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and the nurturing of God’s relationship with humanity. However, through a process of intertextuality, the Qur’an does not merely repeat the concept of raḥûm but transforms, expands, and modifies its meaning in accordance with its own theological framework. Thus, intertextuality signifies a dialogue with earlier traditions without undermining the Qur’an’s framework of meaning
Co-Authors ANWAR FAHMI Hifsa Nurrahim Zahratul Farhah Zira Shafira