Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal El-Thawalib Jurnal Moderasi Jurnal El-Thawalib
ANWAR FAHMI
UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Sinonimitas Makna Nūr, Ḍiyā’, dan Sirāj dalam Al-Qur'an: Kajian Linguistik Semantik Berdasarkan Tafsir Al-Kasysyāf ANWAR FAHMI
Jurnal Moderasi Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/jm.2024.42.03

Abstract

This article is motivated by the use of the words nūr, ḍiyā', and sirāj which are often translated as "light". Although all three have similar basic meanings, each word is used in a different context, raising the question of whether these words are synonymous or have significant differences in meaning. The purpose of this research is to try to uncover the meaning and synonyms of each word by analyzing it through the Tafsir Al-Kasysyāf approach by al-Zamakhsyarī. This research uses a qualitative method with a library research approach. The analysis was carried out using a semantic approach, which focuses on the relationship of meaning between words and the context in which they are used in the verses of the Qur'an. The results of the analysis show that the three terms have a basic meaning as "light", but there are differences in their use. The word nūr refers more to light that is soft and reflective, such as the light of the moon or the light of Allah's guidance that is spiritual. While the word ḍiyā' describes a more intense light and has a hot element, such as sunlight that shines strongly and burns. Meanwhile, the word sirāj refers to a source of light that emits its own rays, such as the sun itself which is referred to as sirāj in the Qur'an. Artikel ini dilatarbelakangi dengan adanya penggunaan kata-kata nūr, ḍiyā’, dan sirāj yang sering diterjemahkan dengan istilah “cahaya”. Meskipun ketiganya mempunyai makna dasar serupa, namun setiap kata digunakan dalam konteks yang berbeda, sehingga menimbulkan pertanyaan apakah kata-kata ini memiliki sinonim atau justru memiliki perbedaan makna yang signifikan. Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini berusaha mengungkap makna dan sinonim masing-masing kata tersebut dengan menganalisisnya melalui pendekatan Tafsir Al-Kasysyāf karya al-Zamakhsyarī. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan kepustakaan (library research). Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan semantik, yang berfokus pada relasi makna antar kata serta konteks penggunaannya dalam ayat-ayat Al-Qur’an. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa ketiga istilah tersebut memiliki arti dasar sebagai “cahaya”, namun terdapat perbedaan dalam penggunaannya. Kata nūr lebih mengarah pada cahaya yang bersifat lembut dan pantulan, seperti cahaya bulan atau cahaya petunjuk Allah yang bersifat spiritual. Sedangkan kata ḍiyā’ menggambarkan cahaya yang lebih intens dan memiliki unsur panas, seperti cahaya matahari yang bersinar kuat dan membakar. Sementara itu, kata sirāj merujuk pada sumber cahaya yang memancarkan sinarnya sendiri, seperti matahari itu sendiri yang disebut sebagai sirāj dalam Al-Qur’an.
Raḥmān and Raḥīm in the Qur'an and the Bible: An Intertextual Reading through Julia Kristeva's Theory Zahratul Farhah; Anwar Fahmi; Zira Shafira; Hifsa Nurrahim; Fadhal Al-Khalidi
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 4 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i4.20817

Abstract

This study examines the intertextuality of the concepts of God’s compassion and mercy through the terms al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm in the Qur’an and raḥûm in the Bible. This study is qualitative in nature, taking the form of a literature review that employs Julia Kristeva’s approach to intertextuality combined with historical analysis. Primary data include Q.S Al-Fatihah/1:1 and 3, Q.S An-Nisa/4:1, Q.S Hud/11:90, and Q.S Al-Zumar/39:53 from the Qur’an, as well as Exodus 34:6, Deuteronomy 4:31, Psalm 78:38, and Isaiah 49:15 from the Bible. Secondary data consists of exegetical works, Arabic and Hebrew lexicons, biblical commentaries, and literature on the theory of intertextuality. Data were collected through documentation, inventory, contextual classification, and the selection of representative verses, then analyzed descriptively and analytically by identifying conceptual similarities, transformations of meaning, and intertextual dialogue. The results of this study indicate that the relationship between raḥûm and al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm extends beyond their shared root, r-ḥ-m, as well as meanings such as compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and the nurturing of God’s relationship with humanity. However, through a process of intertextuality, the Qur’an does not merely repeat the concept of raḥûm but transforms, expands, and modifies its meaning in accordance with its own theological framework. Thus, intertextuality signifies a dialogue with earlier traditions without undermining the Qur’an’s framework of meaning
Raḥmān and Raḥīm in the Qur'an and the Bible: An Intertextual Reading through Julia Kristeva's Theory Zahratul Farhah; Anwar Fahmi; Zira Shafira; Hifsa Nurrahim; Fadhal Al-Khalidi
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 4 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i4.20817

Abstract

This study examines the intertextuality of the concepts of God’s compassion and mercy through the terms al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm in the Qur’an and raḥûm in the Bible. This study is qualitative in nature, taking the form of a literature review that employs Julia Kristeva’s approach to intertextuality combined with historical analysis. Primary data include Q.S Al-Fatihah/1:1 and 3, Q.S An-Nisa/4:1, Q.S Hud/11:90, and Q.S Al-Zumar/39:53 from the Qur’an, as well as Exodus 34:6, Deuteronomy 4:31, Psalm 78:38, and Isaiah 49:15 from the Bible. Secondary data consists of exegetical works, Arabic and Hebrew lexicons, biblical commentaries, and literature on the theory of intertextuality. Data were collected through documentation, inventory, contextual classification, and the selection of representative verses, then analyzed descriptively and analytically by identifying conceptual similarities, transformations of meaning, and intertextual dialogue. The results of this study indicate that the relationship between raḥûm and al-Raḥmān and al-Raḥīm extends beyond their shared root, r-ḥ-m, as well as meanings such as compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and the nurturing of God’s relationship with humanity. However, through a process of intertextuality, the Qur’an does not merely repeat the concept of raḥûm but transforms, expands, and modifies its meaning in accordance with its own theological framework. Thus, intertextuality signifies a dialogue with earlier traditions without undermining the Qur’an’s framework of meaning
Co-Authors Fadhal Al-Khalidi Hifsa Nurrahim Zahratul Farhah Zira Shafira