Ahmad Jamaludin
Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Nusantara, Bandung, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Protection for Healthcare Workers Against Workplace Violence in Indonesian Hospital Governance Dame Lestaria; Ahmad Jamaludin
Research Horizon Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Research Horizon - Juni 2026
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.6.3.2026.1154

Abstract

Workplace violence against healthcare workers remains a persistent risk in health facilities, negatively impacting occupational safety, service quality, and institutional accountability. This research analyzes the scope of legal protection for healthcare workers in cases of violence, using one of the cases in public controversy as a contextual entry point to discuss the full spectrum of violence. The study aims to map the legal framework governing healthcare workers’ protection, examine hospitals’ responsibilities in prevention and response, and formulate feasible protection mechanisms and operational policy recommendations. Utilizing a normative-juridical approach with statutory and conceptual frameworks, the analysis indicates that Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning health explicitly recognizes healthcare workers’ rights to legal protection and occupational safety. However, significant implementation gaps persist at the institutional level, including weak reporting channels, inconsistent standard operating procedures, and insufficient anti-retaliation safeguards. The study concludes that effective protection requires translating statutory rights into robust operational hospital governance through zero-tolerance policies, integrated incident reporting and investigation systems, and comprehensive recovery support for victims.
Autonomous Decision-Making and Agentic AI: Challenges and Prospects for Cyber Law Sayid Muhammad Rifki Noval; Irma Rachmawati; Ahmad Jamaludin; Deden Sumantry; Mohd Zakhiri Md Nor
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Reform, Human Rights Protection, and Judicial Innovation in Contemporary
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v10i1.32845

Abstract

Artificial intelligence's (AI) explosive growth, particularly in the form of Automated Decision Making (ADM) and Agentic AI, has brought significant changes across various sectors of life, while simultaneously posing complex legal and ethical challenges. This paper evaluates AI regulation and governance from the viewpoint on protection of consumers and cyber legislation, with an emphasis on Indonesia, which is striving to integrate this technology into the legal system and public policy. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s current AI-related regulations remain fragmented and insufficient to handle the regulatory dangers that progressively autonomous AI systems bring. This study examines several cases that illustrate the negative impacts of AI, such as algorithmic errors in the credit system in Germany that resulted in injustices for many individuals, as well as the social assistance distribution scandal in the Netherlands that had serious social and political implications. Concurrently, AI Act was adopted by the European Union as a significant regulatory advance that introduced a risk-based framework to increase accountability, transparency and human oversight in AI governance. Additionally, the controversy surrounding moral problems use AI in the US judiciary related to mass surveillance were also critically analyzed. Analysis of the existing regulations, including the Data Protection Law, the Digital Information and Transactions Law, and the Indonesian government's ethical policies, identifies deficiencies that need to be addressed through adaptive and holistic regulations. The concept of computational accountability and the adoption of international regulations as the Product Liability Directive (PLD) and the AI Liability Directive (AILD) are proposed through a normative juridical analysis, as mechanisms to strengthen accountability and legal protection. This paper also highlights the significance of clarification, openness, and awareness of new rights in the setting of increasingly autonomous and adaptive AI.