Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of Technostress and Its Impact on Lecturer Performance in Technology-Based Learning Sundari Soekotjo; Dwi Novita Sari; Hardianawati Hardianawati; Indria Sukma Sektiyaningsih; Mintarsih Mintarsih; Pingkan Luciawati Sompi; Rochayati Febriarhamadini; Dina Agnesia Sihombing; Prasastiara Eka Marsella
International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): July - December 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Komunitas Informasi Teknologi Aceh (KITA), Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35870/ijmsit.v6i2.7543

Abstract

This study investigates technostress among lecturers in private universities under LLDIKTI Region III Jakarta and examines its impact on lecturer performance in technology-based learning environments. Employing a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews with 15 lecturers from various academic ranks, supported by observation and document analysis. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, involving data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that lecturers experience multiple dimensions of technostress, including techno-overload, techno-invasion, techno-complexity, and psychological strain. Techno-overload emerges as the most dominant form, characterized by increased workload and continuous digital demands. Techno-invasion reflects the erosion of work–life boundaries due to constant digital connectivity, while techno-complexity highlights adaptation challenges to rapidly evolving technologies. These conditions collectively contribute to psychological outcomes such as stress, fatigue, and emotional exhaustion. Although technology enhances instructional flexibility and learning innovation, it simultaneously generates a paradox of increased cognitive and emotional burden. The study further finds that technostress influences lecturer performance in both enabling and constraining ways, depending on individual digital competence and institutional support. Lecturers adopt various adaptive strategies, including peer collaboration, self-directed learning, and participation in training programs, to mitigate technostress. The study concludes that technostress is not merely an individual issue but an organizational phenomenon embedded within digital transformation in higher education. The findings provide implications for developing sustainable digital policies and strengthening institutional support systems to enhance lecturer well-being and performance.
PENGARUH BUDAYA KAIZEN DAN DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN DENGAN MOTIVASI KERJA SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING PT PARAGON TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION Adit Pratowo; Sundari Soekotjo
Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING) Vol. 8 No. 6 (2025): COSTING : Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31539/wjhtrn04

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis budaya kaizen dan disiplin kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan yang dimediasi motivasi kerja PT Paragon Technology and Innovation. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode survey dengan sampel berjumlah 250 orang dengan proportional stratified random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner yang telah diuji validitas dan reabilitasnya. Teknik analisis data menggunakan aplikasi Partial Least Square (PLS) version 4.0. Dengan cara evaluasi outer model, inner model dan uji analisis jalur path (path analysis). Hasil penelitian memberikan kesimpulan : (1) Budaya kaizen berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan; (2) Budaya kaizen tidak berpengaruh dan tidak signifikan terhadap motivasi kerja; (3) Disiplin kerja berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan; (4) Disiplin kerja berpengaruh signifikan terhadap motivasi kerja; (5) Motivasi kerja berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan; (6) Pengaruh budaya kaizen terhadap kinerja karyawan tidak mampu dimediasi oleh motivasi kerja; (7) Pengaruh disiplin kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan mampu dimediasi oleh motivasi kerja. (8) Nilai koefisien determinan (R2) konstruk motivasi kerja sebesar 0.548, menunjukan bahwa pengaruh konstruk budaya kaizen dan disiplin kerja terhadap motivasi kerja sebesar 54,8%; (9) Nilai koefisien determinasi (R2) konstruk kinerja karyawan sebesar 0.778, menunjukan bahwa pengaruh motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan sebesar 78,8%.