Andre Arya Pratama
Universitas Gadjah Mada

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

The Policy Changes of State-Owned Enterprises Concerning Foreigner in the Perspective of Talcott Persons Structural Functional Theory Andre Arya Pratama; Anggun Nurfani; Rilda Murniati
Pancasila and Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/plr.v6i1.4856

Abstract

Law Number 16 of 2025 allows foreign nationals to occupy strategic positions in State-Owned Enterprises, triggering debate between the demands of modernization in a globalized economy and the principle of national economic sovereignty under Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. This normative legal study applies a statute approach, an analytical approach, and Talcott Parsons’ AGIL framework to examine the legal and sociological implications of this policy. The findings show that the policy functions as an adaptive strategy to improve governance and competitiveness, but it also raises challenges in integrating international professional standards with local organizational culture and in maintaining economic nationalism. While foreign involvement may reduce political pressures in decision making, it simultaneously generates resistance related to the sovereignty of public resources. The effectiveness of this policy therefore depends on the ability of the legal system and SOE management to balance global openness with the preservation of national values, supported by clear implementing regulations and mechanisms for domestic capacity building through knowledge transfer.
Criminal Liability Model for Deepfake AI Developers: European Union Inspiration for Indonesia’s Legal Framework Andre Arya Pratama; Fikri Rosyad Fathurrahman; Rani Lestari
Ius Poenale Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/ip.v6i1.4612

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly deepfake technology, presents both opportunities and risks, including fraud, disinformation, and digital sexual crimes. In Indonesia, the legal framework primarily holds users accountable while leaving AI developers largely unregulated, creating legal gaps and weakening victim protection. This study examines criminal liability for AI developers under Indonesian law and proposes an ideal model inspired by the European Union, where developers face obligations for transparency, labeling, and liability for defective AI products. Using normative legal research and comparative analysis, the study finds that shifting accountability toward developers would enhance victim protection, close regulatory gaps, and establish a balanced legal framework that aligns AI innovation with responsibility.
Digital Transformation of Public Participation in Indonesia's Constitutional System: The Effectiveness of the Indonesian House of Representatives' Aspiration Channel as an Instrument of Participatory Democracy Abdusyahid Naufal Fathullah; Muhamad Alief Hidayat; Andre Arya Pratama
Constitutionale Vol 6 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v6i1.4635

Abstract

Public participation in Indonesia has increasingly shifted toward digital models following the COVID-19 pandemic, yet substantive engagement remains limited despite 221.56 million internet users and persistent urban–rural digital disparities. Using a socio-legal approach, this study examines the alignment between regulatory frameworks and digital participation practices in the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI), focusing on initiatives such as DPR Now! and the Public Aspiration Agency. The findings show that participation mechanisms remain at the tokenistic consultation level on Arnstein’s Ladder, reflected in a low response rate of 3 percent, weak feedback loops, fragmented platforms, and the absence of a legal mandate to integrate public input into legislative decision-making. Comparative analysis with international models, including Decide Madrid and Taiwan, demonstrates the potential to significantly enhance participation through co-creation mechanisms supported by blockchain and AI-based sentiment analysis. Accordingly, this study proposes the establishment of Digital Deliberation Councils, regulatory harmonization, and constitutional amendments to guarantee digital participation rights, providing a foundation for a more inclusive and deliberative digital democracy in Indonesia.
DINAMIKA PEMBENTUKAN DAN STRATEGI ADVOKASI KEBIJAKAN: STUDI REVISI PERDA PAJAK KOTA CIREBON Andre Arya Pratama; Nisrina Putri; Sudi Harti; Gaddy Nabiha; Ratu Beimaira Suat Pasai
Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Vol 21 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Samudra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33059/jhsk.v21i1.13793

Abstract

Kenaikan Pajak Daerah PBB di Kota Cirebon yang dituangkan dalam Perda menuai problematik dan respon penolakan dari masyarakat. Hal tersebut menunjukkan adanya ketidakpuasan terhadap regulasi yang dianggap tidak berpihak pada kondisi sosial-ekonomi masyarakat. Sehingga nya penelitian ini berupaya menganalisis pada proses pembentukan Perda tersebut melalui kajian terhadap law making process, peran aktor politik, serta respons sosial masyarakat. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisis dengan komprehensif terhadap law making process Peraturan Daerah Kota Cirebon Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah, dengan berfokuskan pada dinamika peran dari setiap aktor. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif-empiris yang merupakan penelitian hukum yang dilengkapi dengan data empirik. Jenis penelitian berupa data sekunder (dari bahan hukum yang didapat jurnal dan website internet) dan didukung oleh data primer berupa wawancara. Hasil penelitian pun menunjukan bahwa dalam fase proses pembentukan perda tidak sepenuhnya memenuhi prinsip transparansi, dalam pembahasan pun terkesan tertutup dan elitis, karena minim dokumentasi resmi berupa risalah sidang atau notulensi yang dapat diakses publik. Bukan hanya itu adanya dominasi aktor eksekutif dan legislatif dalam proses ini memperlihatkan lemahnya pastisipasi masyarakat dan keterbukaan publik. Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini adalah pembentukan Perda Cirebon berlangsung sebagai respons cepat atas mandat pusat, namun tanpa naskah akademik, risalah, dan forum terbuka, sehingga prosesnya didominasi kepentingan eksekutif-legislatif dan minim transparansi masyarakat. Dampaknya terlihat dari kenaikan PBB-P2 hingga 1.000% yang memicu resistensi luas karena perhitungan NJOP tertutup dan keputusan dianggap tergesa. Disamping itu advokasi warga melalui hearing, aksi, dan judicial review terhambat oleh rigiditas prosedur. Tekanan publik akhirnya memaksa komitmen revisi Pasal 9 dan penurunan tarif maksimal menjadi 0,3%, menunjukkan bahwa lemahnya proses legislasi merusak legitimasi, tetapi konsistensi gerakan warga mampu mendorong koreksi kebijakan