Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJELaSS: International Journal of Education, Language and Social Scince
Ahmad Syukri SS
UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Philosophy of Science as a Foundation for Scientific Method Development M. Thontawi; Ahmad Syukri SS; Badarussyamsi
International Journal of Education, Language, and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): IJELaSS: International Journal of Education, Language and Social Science
Publisher : Darul Ilmi Bina Insan Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62612/ijelass.v2i2.48

Abstract

Philosophy of science plays a critical role as the epistemological foundation in shaping research methodologies and guiding scientific inquiries. Although previous literature emphasizes the theoretical connection between philosophy and science, studies synthesizing how specific philosophical paradigms directly dictate operational research designs remain limited. This study aims to analyze the role of philosophy of science in developing scientific methods through a critical synthesis of ontological, epistemological, and axiological pillars across major research paradigms. Utilizing a descriptive-analytical library research approach, relevant literature on philosophy, methodology, and scientific inquiry was systematically examined. The findings demonstrate that philosophical paradigms directly govern research operations: (1) positivism enforces quantitative, experimental designs aimed at empirical verification and causal relationships; (2) constructivism drives qualitative, naturalistic approaches focused on contextual meaning and dialectical interpretation; and (3) pragmatism serves as the theoretical bridge for mixed-methods research, prioritizing practical problem-solving over methodological purity. Furthermore, the study underscores that integrating axiological reflection is vital for navigating contemporary methodological challenges, including algorithmic bias and data ethics. In conclusion, philosophy of science provides both the logical structure for operational methodology and the ethical framework necessary for maintaining scientific integrity
Axiology of Modern Science: Navigating Ethical Dilemmas, Technological Imperatives, and Humanistic Benefits Ade Sofa; Ahmad Syukri SS; Badarussyamsi
International Journal of Education, Language, and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): IJELaSS: International Journal of Education, Language and Social Science
Publisher : Darul Ilmi Bina Insan Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62612/ijelass.v2i2.49

Abstract

In an era characterized by rapid technological innovation, artificial intelligence expansion, and ecological crises, the development of science often prioritizes technical progress over moral considerations. This study critically examines the axiology of science as an essential philosophical framework to ensure scientific advancements remain aligned with human dignity and planetary sustainability. Utilizing a qualitative library research design with a philosophical-hermeneutic approach, this paper synthesizes contemporary and classical literature on the value dimensions of science. The analysis addresses three core issues: the structural alignment between axiology and scientific inquiry, the systemic factors leading to the marginalization of axiological reflection, and a critical evaluation of science's benefits alongside its potential risks. The findings demonstrate that axiology serves not merely as a moral supervisor, but as a active compass that bridges theoretical knowledge with human welfare, limits destructive applications, and promotes inclusive, data-driven public policy. However, the institutional dominance of positivism, hyper-specialization, and commercial pressures frequently sideline axiological considerations in modern research environments. The study concludes that embedding axiological evaluation into scientific education, policy design, and research governance is imperative for transforming scientific progress into sustainable, ethically grounded benefits for humanity.
Correlation of Ontology of Science in the Concept of Educational Management Nining Huriati; Ahmad Syukri SS; Badarussyamsi; Andam Yulianti; Muhammad Taher; Mufida Maryamah Gustia
International Journal of Education, Language, and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): IJELaSS: International Journal of Education, Language and Social Science
Publisher : Darul Ilmi Bina Insan Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62612/ijelass.v3i2.46

Abstract

This article examines the ontological aspects of knowledge within the perspective of philosophy and its connection to educational management. Ontology, as a branch of philosophy that explores the nature of being and reality, provides a foundational framework for the development of knowledge, including education. In the context of educational management, ontology serves as a basis for understanding the reality, existence, and underlying values of educational systems. This approach enables the application of principles such as sustainability, meaningfulness, and empowerment in educational management. The article also explores the relevance of ontological philosophy in building a value-based framework for educational management, including curriculum development, human resource management, and the adoption of technological innovation in education. Furthermore, integrating ontology into modern educational management addresses the challenges of the digital era by ensuring that educational objectives remain relevant and adaptive to changing times. This study aims to foster a deeper understanding of the importance of ontological philosophy as a foundation for holistic and meaningful educational management.
Co-Authors Ade Sofa Badarussyamsi M. Thontawi Mufida Maryamah Gustia Muhammad Taher Nining Huriati Yulianti, Andam