Melva Noya
Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Social Conflict Resolution and Collective Action in Contemporary Multicultural Societies Fazsya Tatra Khalia; Melva Noya; Edyanto Edyanto; Maudhy Satyadharma; Deford Cristy Birahy
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): :February: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studie
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/f9tj9075

Abstract

This study investigates how social conflict resolution practices interact with collective action dynamics in contemporary multicultural societies through an empirical mixed-methods design integrating survey modeling, interviews, and observational analysis. Quantitative findings reveal that perceived procedural fairness, identity negotiation competence, and institutional transparency significantly predict intergroup trust, collective efficacy, and sustained participation. Qualitative evidence demonstrates that dialogical mediation reframes conflict as a cooperative learning process, enabling participants to transform identity tension into shared civic engagement. The analysis identifies a recursive architecture in which culturally responsive conflict mechanisms, recognition-based identity framing, and adaptive institutional structures jointly stabilize collective cooperation. Structural models show that emotional regulation and legitimacy perceptions mediate the transition from disagreement to coordinated action, while narrative data illustrate how culturally grounded practices enhance resilience and participation continuity. The integrated interpretation positions conflict not as social breakdown but as a generative site of institutional learning and identity recalibration. The study contributes a multi-level framework explaining how multicultural societies sustain cooperation by embedding fairness, recognition, and reflexive governance into everyday conflict engagement.
Legal Certainty in Fintech Regulation: A Normative Study of Peer-to-Peer Lending Governance in Indonesia Deo Renaldi Saputra; Melva Noya
Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): March: Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article examines legal certainty within Indonesia’s peer-to-peer (P2P) lending regulatory framework through a doctrinal normative approach employing statutory, conceptual, and comparative analysis. The study evaluates the coherence of legislation governing financial supervision, electronic transactions, consumer protection, Sharia finance, data protection, and sustainable finance policy, alongside relevant OJK regulations and judicial decisions. The findings indicate that although Indonesia has established a comprehensive regulatory architecture, legal certainty remains challenged by normative fragmentation, dual governance structures between conventional and Sharia models, overlapping enforcement mandates, and procedural inconsistencies in dispute resolution. The regulatory sandbox mechanism and sustainability integration further complicate predictability where evaluative benchmarks and sanction gradations lack precise articulation. Comparative reflection on Islamic fintech governance and enforcement coordination highlights the importance of institutional synergy and codified supervisory alignment. The research concludes that strengthening cross-referencing norms, clarifying organizer liability standards, harmonizing jurisdictional competencies, and embedding enforceable sustainability and data protection obligations are necessary to enhance doctrinal coherence. Legal certainty emerges not merely from regulatory proliferation but from systematic hierarchical integration capable of reconciling innovation with constitutional rule-of-law principles in the digital financial sector
International Human Rights Law: Protection of Refugees in Contemporary Conflicts Deo Renaldi Saputra; Sahal Hanafi; Sunusi Dauda; Melva Noya; Bunga Dwi Fani Ritonga
International Journal of Law and Political Authority Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): January: Corpus: International Journal of Law and Political Authority
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Contemporary armed conflicts have generated complex patterns of forced displacement that challenge the adequacy of traditional refugee protection frameworks. This article examines the role of international human rights law in safeguarding refugees within the context of modern conflicts characterized by protracted violence, institutional fragility, and evolving displacement drivers. Using a normative legal research methodology, the study analyzes the convergence between international human rights law, refugee law, and international humanitarian law, with particular attention to enforcement mechanisms and judicial practice. The findings reveal that human rights law provides a universal and enforceable normative foundation that extends protection beyond formal refugee status, strengthens the principle of non-refoulement, and enhances accountability through judicial oversight. The article further identifies emerging challenges, including temporary protection regimes, climate-related displacement, and digital governance, which require adaptive human rights-based responses. By situating refugee protection within a rights-centered legal framework, this study underscores the continuing relevance of international human rights law as a vital instrument for protecting displaced populations amid increasingly complex and unstable global conflict environments.