Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects)
Rahul Ardian
Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penyitaan dan Pemusnahan Barang Bukti Narkotika Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Studi Kasus Ditresnarkoba Polda Sumut Kesia Greti Rimporok; Abdul Razak Nasutioan; Rahul Ardian
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 03 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i03.1574

Abstract

Penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana narkotika merupakan salah satu prioritas dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia, mengingat tingginya angka peredaran dan penyalahgunaan narkotika yang mengancam stabilitas sosial dan keamanan nasional. Salah satu aspek penting dalam penegakan hukum tersebut adalah proses penyitaan dan pemusnahan barang bukti narkotika yang diatur secara tegas dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan penyitaan dan pemusnahan barang bukti narkotika di lingkungan Direktorat Reserse Narkoba Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara (Ditresnarkoba Polda Sumut), serta menilai kesesuaiannya dengan ketentuan hukum positif yang berlaku. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris, dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dan wawancara langsung dengan aparat penegak hukum di Ditresnarkoba Polda Sumut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara umum, pelaksanaan penyitaan dan pemusnahan barang bukti narkotika telah dilakukan sesuai prosedur hukum, namun masih terdapat kendala di lapangan seperti keterlambatan administrasi, minimnya sarana laboratorium uji narkotika, serta risiko penyalahgunaan barang bukti sebelum dimusnahkan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa meskipun telah ada payung hukum yang kuat, efektivitas pelaksanaan penyitaan dan pemusnahan barang bukti narkotika masih memerlukan pengawasan ketat dan perbaikan dalam aspek koordinasi antar lembaga. Penulis merekomendasikan peningkatan transparansi, digitalisasi sistem pelaporan, serta penegakan sanksi bagi pelanggaran prosedural untuk memastikan integritas proses hukum dalam penanganan perkara narkotika
Implications of Changes in the Role of Mamak on the Legitimacy of Minangkabau Customary Marriages: A Socio-Legal Study in Rantau and Ranah Irma Fatmawati; Rahul Ardian; Annisa Febrina
International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : CERED Indonesia Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53695/injects.v6i2.1444

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implications of changes in the role of the 'mamak' on the validity of Minangkabau customary marriages, particularly by comparing practices in the 'ranah' (hometown) and in the 'rantau' (diaspora). In the Minangkabau matrilineal kinship system, the mamak holds a central position as clan leader, decision-maker, and the party that provides customary legitimacy for marriages. However, modernization, social mobility, and changes in family structure have led to shifts in the function and authority of the mamak in various social contexts. This study uses a socio-legal approach to examine how customary norms, religious law, and state law interact in the marriage process, while also exploring how society perceives the validity of marriage when the role of the mamak is no longer dominant. The results show that in the ranah, the role of the mamak remains relatively strong, so the validity of marriage is greatly influenced by the mamak's approval and presence in the customary proceedings. Meanwhile, in the regions, the authority of the mamak (maternal uncle) tends to decline and is often replaced by the biological father, religious figures, or other family figures, without affecting the validity of marriages according to state and religious law. This shift leads to variations in customary practices, potential family conflicts, and renegotiations of the meaning of 'valid' according to adat. Furthermore, it was found that communities make adjustments by recognizing the flexibility of adat as long as it does not conflict with sharia principles, allowing adat to continue in a changing social context. This study concludes that the changing role of the mamak has implications for the transformation of Minangkabau customary marriage practices but does not undermine the legitimacy of marriage as long as the principle of harmonization between adat, sharia, and positive law is maintained. These findings contribute to the development of customary law studies, the strengthening of the socio-legal basis in marriage studies, as well as the understanding of social change dynamics in matrilineal societies.
Reputation Crisis Due to Influencer Controversy: Implications for Brand Marketing Communication Strategies in Indonesia Annisa Febrina; Rahul Ardian; Irma Fatmawati
International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : CERED Indonesia Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53695/injects.v6i2.1445

Abstract

Influencer marketing has become a dominant strategy for brands in Indonesia, offering wide reach and strong audience engagement. However, the growing reliance on influencers also exposes brands to significant reputation risks, particularly when influencers become involved in public controversies. This study examines the impact of influencer-related reputation crises on brand image and evaluates how brands respond through their marketing communication strategies. Using a qualitative approach supported by case analysis from recent controversy-driven incidents, the research identifies key patterns in consumer reactions, media amplification, and the effectiveness of various crisis response strategies. Findings show that delayed responses, inconsistent messaging, and failure to distance from problematic influencers can intensify public backlash. Conversely, proactive communication, transparent clarification, and strategic message reframing help restore brand credibility more effectively. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of crisis communication within the context of influencer marketing and provides practical recommendations for Indonesian brands to manage emerging risks in the digital ecosystem.
Co-Authors Abdul Razak Nasutioan Annisa Febrina Irma Fatmawati Kesia Greti Rimporok