Yasintha Sari Pratiwi
Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Mulawarman, Jalan Muara Pahu, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur 75119, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Efektivitas Bimbingan Kelompok dengan Teknik Reframing untuk Mengatasi Rendahnya Kepercayaan Diri Siswa Berbicara di Depan Umum Siti Hartina; Syarifudin Syarifudin; Yasintha Sari Pratiwi; Muhaimin Abdillah
Panthera : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains dan Terapan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian Kamandanu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/panthera.v6i2.1111

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of group guidance with reframing techniques in overcoming students' low confidence in public speaking. The study was conducted at SMK Negeri 7 Samarinda, Samarinda City. This study used a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent control group design. The research subjects were 16 students divided into an experimental group and a control group of 8 students each. The data collection technique used a public speaking confidence scale in the form of a Likert scale. The instrument has been tested for validity with the Pearson correlation technique and tested for reliability using Alpha Cronbach. In addition to the scale, data were also obtained through observation and interviews to describe the conditions and behavior of students during the service process and after the treatment process was carried out. Data analysis techniques in this study included prerequisite analysis and hypothesis testing. Prerequisite analysis was carried out with a normality test using Shapiro-Wilk and a homogeneity test using the Levene test through the SPSS version 25 program. Furthermore, hypothesis testing was carried out using an independent samples t-test. Score improvement analysis was also carried out using N-gain to measure changes in pre-test and post-test scores in each group. The results showed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups after treatment, with a 2-tailed significance value of 0.028 (p < 0.05). The experimental group's posttest average was 88.2, higher than the control group's 76.3. The experimental group's average N-gain score was 0.6945, higher than the control group's 0.3296. These findings indicate that group guidance with the reframing technique is significantly effective, based on the difference in posttest scores and N-gain scores, in increasing students' confidence in public speaking and can be an alternative service for guidance and counseling teachers in schools.
Hubungan Toxic Parenting dan Duck Syndrome dengan Kesejahteraan Psikologis Remaja Silva Daya; Dwi Sona; Yasintha Sari Pratiwi; Muhaimin Abdillah
Panthera : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains dan Terapan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian Kamandanu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/panthera.v6i2.1130

Abstract

This study aims to determine the relationship between toxic parenting and duck syndrome with the psychological well-being of adolescents. This study uses a quantitative method with a correlational approach. The subjects of the study were grade X students of SMA Negeri 3 Samarinda who were selected using a purposive sampling technique with the criteria of male and female students, experiencing toxic parenting and duck syndrome with moderate to high categories, with a research sample of 92. The results of the study showed that toxic parenting and duck syndrome had a relationship with a sig. 0.000 <0.05 with a positive relationship direction which means that the higher the toxic parenting, the higher the tendency of duck syndrome in adolescents. In toxic parenting and psychological well-being there was a relationship with a sig. 0.001 <0.05 with a negative relationship direction which means that the higher the toxic parenting, the lower the psychological well-being. Furthermore, in duck syndrome and psychological well-being there was a relationship with a sig. 0.000 < 0.05, with a negative correlation, meaning that the higher the duck syndrome, the lower the psychological well-being. Finally, there was a correlation between toxic parenting and duck syndrome and psychological well-being, with a significant value of 0.000 < 0.05. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that toxic parenting and the tendency towards duck syndrome are simultaneously related to the psychological well-being of adolescents. Toxic parenting and duck syndrome are factors that need to be considered in efforts to improve the psychological well-being of adolescents, so parents and schools need to play a role in creating an environment that supports healthy psychological development.
Perbedaan Bimbingan Kelompok Teknik Symbolic Model dengan Bimbingan Kelompok Konvensional dalam Peningkatan Efikasi Diri Santriwati Nahdlatien Habibatil Mubarakah; Rury Muslifar; Wahyu Widyatmoko; Muhaimin Abdillah; Yasintha Sari Pratiwi; Dwi Sona
Panthera : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains dan Terapan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): July (In Progress)
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian Kamandanu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/panthera.v6i3.1345

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences between group guidance services with symbolic model techniques and conventional group guidance services in improving the self-efficacy of female students at Ibnu Hasan Islamic Boarding School in Samarinda. This study uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent control group design. The research subjects were 8 female students who were included in the low self-efficacy category based on the self-efficacy scale. They were divided into two groups, namely the experimental group and the control group, each consisting of 4 people. Data collection techniques used a self-efficacy scale, observation, and interviews. The results of the study showed that there was a significant difference in the level of self-efficacy between the experimental group and the control group after being given treatment based on the results of the independent samples t-test, with a sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.001 (p <0.05). The average posttest score of the experimental group was 99.8, higher than the control group of 81.0. Therefore, this study concludes that there is a significant difference between group guidance using the symbolic model and conventional group guidance in improving the self-efficacy of female students. This approach can be an alternative service for guidance and counseling teachers in schools to address low self-efficacy in female students.