Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.006
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial
Gousta Feriza
Universitas Esa Unggul
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Pasal 45 Undang Undang Informasi dan Elektronik Terkait Judi Online dalam Perspektif Upaya Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan Siber: Penelitian Gilang Rahadian; Gousta Feriza
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 3 (Januari 202
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4368

Abstract

The development of information technology has contributed to the increasing incidence of online gambling as a form of cybercrime that adversely affects social order and public morality. This study aims to analyze the application of Article 45 of the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE Law), particularly the regulatory shift from Article 45 paragraph (2) of Law Number 19 of 2016 to Article 45 paragraph (3) of Law Number 1 of 2024, in the enforcement of online gambling offenses, as well as to examine judicial reasoning from the perspective of justice. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The analysis focuses on three court decisions, namely Decision Number 16/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jakarta Selatan, Decision Number 123/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Payahkumbuh, and Decision Number 575/Pid.B/2025/PN Kisaran. The findings indicate that Article 45 of the ITE Law functions as a lex specialis in addressing online gambling conducted through electronic media and provides a clear legal basis for law enforcement. However, differences in judicial considerations and variations in sentencing were identified among cases with relatively similar offense elements, giving rise to issues of substantive justice, particularly concerning sentencing proportionality and differentiation of offenders’ roles.
Analisis Yuridis Penggunaan Rekening Pribadi Orang Lain dalam Tindak Pidana Judi Online (Studi Putusan No 138/PID.SUS /2024/PN. BTM): Penelitian Jasmine Azura Nasution; Gousta Feriza
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 3 (Januari 202
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4438

Abstract

This research examines the juridical aspects of utilizing third-party personal bank accounts in online gambling crimes, focusing on the study of Decision Number 138/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Batam. The study is prompted by the increasing prevalence of online gambling practices that exploit third-party accounts to disguise financial transaction flows. The legal problem investigates the application of criminal liability under the Personal Data Protection Law and evaluates the judge's legal considerations through the lens of John Rawls' theory of justice. This study employs a normative juridical method with a case study approach, drawing from primary legal materials such as statutory regulations and court decisions, as well as secondary legal materials including legal doctrines and literature. Data analysis is conducted descriptively by applying Gustav Radbruch's theory of legal certainty to assess the consistency of legal norm application, and John Rawls' theory of justice to evaluate substantive justice for the aggrieved parties. The results indicate that the unauthorized use of bank accounts fulfills the elements of unlawful personal data processing, specifically regarding personal financial data as regulated under the Personal Data Protection Law. However, the court only applied the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law and the Money Laundering (TPPU) Law without integrating the Personal Data Protection Law, leading to normative inconsistencies and a failure to provide optimal protection for personal data subjects.
Penerapan Asas Lex Specialis dalam Kasus Penipuan Berbasis Manipulasi Bukti Transfer Digital: Penelitian Gabriel Regina Christian; Gousta Feriza
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 3 (Januari 202
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4527

Abstract

This research examines the application of Article 35 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) in cases involving manipulated digital transfer receipts, as adjudicated in Decision Number 358/Pid.B/2023/PN Yogyakarta. The study is motivated by the increasing prevalence of cybercrimes involving falsified electronic data, while law enforcement practice remains inconsistent in determining whether the lex specialis provision under the ITE Law or the general fraud provision under Article 378 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) should apply. This research addresses two main issues: the analysis of criminal elements based on trial facts, and the application of electronic evidence as well as its implications for legal certainty in enforcing the ITE Law. A normative legal research method is employed, using statutory, case, and document approaches through examination of the court judgment. The results reveal that the elements of electronic data manipulation under Article 35 of the ITE Law were actually fulfilled, but the judges applied Article 378 KUHP by treating the falsified transfer receipt merely as an auxiliary tool rather than the core of the offense. This approach creates normative inconsistency and weakens the function of the ITE Law as lex specialis. The study concludes that the enforcement of the ITE Law in digital fraud cases has not been optimized, highlighting the need for standardized digital evidence examination and judicial guidelines to strengthen legal certainty.
Pembaharuan Kebijakan Formulasi Pelaksanaan Pidana Denda dan Pidana Tambahan Pembayaran Ganti Kerugian dalam Undang-Undang Perlidungan Data Pribadi Idris Wasahua; Euis Nurul Bahriyah; Zulfikar Judge; Gousta Feriza
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 12 (2025): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.3064

Abstract

Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection regulates criminal sanctions in the form of fines and additional sanctions of compensation payment, enforced through the seizure of the convicted person’s assets or income. This policy aims to ensure the fulfillment of criminal sanctions and to provide legal protection for victims of personal data violations. However, this study finds that the current formulation policy contains fundamental weaknesses, as asset seizure may only be conducted after a court decision has obtained final and binding legal force, thereby allowing the convicted person to transfer assets during the lengthy criminal process. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that such weaknesses may hinder the execution of fines and compensation payments and undermine the objectives of punishment. Therefore, this study recommends reformulating the policy by allowing asset seizure at the investigation stage as a legal guarantee to ensure effective enforcement of fines and compensation payments, as well as stronger protection for victims of personal data misuse.
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Korban KDRT Ditinjau dari Prinsip Kesetaraan dalam Hukum: Penelitian Melda Saputri Darmawan; Gousta Feriza; Juanda
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 4 Nomor 2 June - September
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v4i2.568

Abstract

Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga merupakan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia yang berdampak pada keluarga dan kehidupan sosial. Permasalahan yang dihadapi adalah bagaimana penegakan hukum terhadap korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) ditinjau dari prinsip kesetaraan dalam perspektif hukum dan faktor-faktor apa saja yang menyebabkan atau melatarbelakangi peningkatan atas kasus tindak pidana KDRT. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prinsip equality before the law dalam Pasal 27 ayat (1) UUD 1945 belum sepenuhnya terwujud dalam penegakan hukum KDRT. Meskipun UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang PKDRT telah memberikan perlindungan bagi korban, masih terdapat kendala berupa bias gender, sanksi yang ringan, dan mediasi yang belum selalu berpihak pada korban. Berdasarkan teori keadilan John Rawls dan hukum progresif menurut konsep Suteki, kondisi ini menunjukkan belum optimalnya keadilan substantif bagi korban. Selain itu, peningkatan kasus KDRT dipengaruhi oleh faktor budaya patriarki, stigma korban, ketergantungan ekonomi, hambatan hukum, dan trauma psikologis, sehingga diperlukan pendekatan yang lebih komprehensif dalam perlindungan korban.
Dissenting Opinion dalam Putusan Pidana Ditinjau dari Prinsip Equality Before The Law (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 942 K/PID.SUS/2022): Penelitian Adelline Julian Firman Atmadiputra; Gousta Feriza; Juanda
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 4 Nomor 2 June - September
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v4i2.569

Abstract

Kajian ini menganalisis implementasi asas equality before the law dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 942 K/Pid.Sus/2022 serta implikasinya terhadap kepastian hukum dan keadilan pemidanaan tindak pidana korupsi. Menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan undang-undang, kasus, dan konseptual, penelitian ini mendapati bahwa menjadikan rekam jejak dan kontribusi publik terdakwa sebagai hal yang meringankan hukuman berpotensi mencederai asas kesetaraan di hadapan hukum dan memicu disparitas vonis. Praktik peradilan semacam ini dapat mengikis kepastian hukum, legitimasi publik, serta rasa keadilan masyarakat. Oleh sebab itu, hakim dituntut menerapkan pemidanaan yang objektif, terukur, dan konsisten guna menjamin kesetaraan perlakuan hukum pada perkara korupsi.
Co-Authors Adelline Julian Firman Atmadiputra Bahriyah, Euis Nurul Gabriel Regina Christian Gilang Rahadian Jasmine Azura Nasution Juanda Melda Saputri Darmawan Wasahua, Idris Zulfikar Judge