Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Dedi Mulyadi's Political Communication Strategy in The 2024 West Java Gubernatory Election: Analysis Through The Agenda Setting Approach Ai Norma Yunita; Al Haura Millani; Anissa Rizqi Syafitri; Citra Dewi Agustin
Buana Komunikasi (Jurnal Penelitian dan Studi Ilmu Komunikasi) Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Komunikasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik USB YPKP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32897/buanakomunikasi.2025.6.2.4491

Abstract

Dedi Mulyadi's successful 2024 West Java Gubernatorial Election campaign integrated traditional Sundanese culture with digital media, a strategy analyzed through a descriptive qualitative methodology examining academic sources, online news, and social media. His consistent portrayal as a compassionate, humble, and approachable leader, amplified by positive content on YouTube, Facebook, and TikTok, was central to his political communication. Mulyadi deliberately utilized Sundanese cultural symbols to reinforce his political identity, while significant support from a coalition of political parties broadened his electoral reach. Through an effective agenda-setting strategy, he successfully framed crucial issues positively, thereby countering negative campaigns and offering valuable insights for future local political communication approaches that blend digital and cultural elements.
Tinjauan Siyasah Maliyah Tentang Pengawasan Keuangan Negara Melalui Opini Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian oleh Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Al Haura Millani; Beni Ahmad Saebani; Chaerul Shaleh
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 8 No. 4 (2026): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v8i4.2216

Abstract

An Unqualified Opinion is one of the prestigious achievements sought by government officials who use public funds in the performance of their duties. An Unqualified Opinion is not the sole indicator of sound financial management, nor does it guarantee freedom from corruption. This study aims to examine whether the Unqualified Opinion aligns with the objectives of oversight and the principles of fiscal policy in efforts to achieve sound financial governance and advance the public interest. Data were collected through a literature review using content analysis, which involves analyzing the content and interpreting various legal provisions and relevant concepts to address the research questions. The results of the study indicate that the unqualified audit opinion (WTP) is fundamentally consistent with the principles of fiscal policy, particularly the principle of trust and the objectives of state financial oversight in safeguarding public assets. Nevertheless, the WTP opinion cannot serve as an absolute guarantee that an entity is free from corruption due to the limited scope of the audit and the nature of financial statement examinations, which are not specifically designed to uncover acts of corruption. Nevertheless, the unqualified opinion (WTP) retains strategic value as an instrument of state financial oversight because it plays a preventive role in enhancing accountability, minimizing the potential for irregularities, and supporting the realization of good governance.