Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Tantangan Perlindungan Hak Cipta atas Karya Sastra AI Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Pritha Arintha Natasaputri
Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 5 No 3: Desember (2025)
Publisher : Arden Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57250/ajsh.v5i3.2263

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan hukum serta tantangan perlindungan hak cipta terhadap karya sastra yang dihasilkan oleh kecerdasan buatan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta belum mengatur secara eksplisit status hukum karya sastra berbasis Kecerdasan buatan, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum terkait subjek pemegang hak cipta, hak moral, dan hak ekonomi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan formulasi pengaturan hukum yang adaptif, baik melalui atribusi hak cipta kepada pihak yang memiliki kontribusi dominan maupun melalui pembentukan rezim perlindungan hukum khusus (sui generis), guna memberikan kepastian hukum terhadap karya sastra berbasis Kecerdasan buatan di Indonesia.
Legal Vacuum in Inheritance Dispute Resolution: A Comparative Study of Customary Law and Positive Law in Bonokeling Zaenudin Zaenudin; Ajeng Aditya Listyani; Wasis Singgih Sasono; Nanda Rahayu Haryadi; Pritha Arintha Natasaputri
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i2.3035

Abstract

This study examines the legal vacuum in resolving inheritance disputes in the Bonokeling indigenous community in Pekuncen Village, Jatilawang District, Banyumas Regency, Central Java, by examining the tension between customary law norms and the national legal system. Although the customary inheritance norms of the Bonokeling indigenous community, based on family deliberation, are still alive and well, the resulting agreements often lack legal force in the state's judicial system. This study employed a normative and empirical juridical approach (socio-legal research). Data were obtained through literature review, interviews, and observations within the Bonokeling indigenous community. The findings indicate that the legal vacuum is institutional and regulatory, rather than normative, because customary norms persist but have not received adequate formal recognition. The absence of a legal mechanism to validate the results of family deliberations creates the potential for legal conflict when disputes are brought to court. Therefore, this study recommends the need for a legal strengthening scheme for customary decisions, for example through the creation of a peace deed or legal recognition of customary deliberation mechanisms. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of integrating legal pluralism into the national legal system to ensure substantive justice and legal certainty for indigenous peoples.