Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an,Tafsirdan Pemikiran Islam Ulumul Qur'an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir
Ahmad Mahrus Mariadi
Universitas PTIQ Jakarta
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Konstruksi Makna Fasād dan Ihlāk dalam Perspektif Tafsir Maqāṣidī dan Relevansinya terhadap Praktik Ekosida Lahan Pascatambang Irfan Fauzi; Imamul Burhan; Ahmad Mahrus Mariadi; Nur Arfiyah Febriani
Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam
Publisher : IAIFA Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58401/takwiluna.v7i1.3021

Abstract

This article examines the socio-ecological ramifications of the post-mining land crisis in Indonesia, which necessitates a more sophisticated theological response beyond general readings of environmental degradation. This research aims to address this crisis by proposing a novel interpretation of the terms fasād (corruption/damage) and ihlāk (annihilation/destruction) in QS. Al-Baqarah: 205, utilizing a Maqashidi Tafsir approach. Methodologically, this study is a qualitative library-based research that operationalizes the Maqashidi Tafsir framework proposed by Abdul Mustaqim. The analysis is conducted through three stages: first, examining the linguistic structure and comparative meanings of fasād and ihlāk; second, extracting the maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah (objectives of Islamic law) from QS. Al-Baqarah: 205; and third, contextualizing these maqāṣidi values to evaluate the status of ecocide in Indonesia's post-mining land crisis. The results demonstrate that the term ihlāk offers a more precise conceptualization of the total destruction of ecosystems (al-ḥarṡ wa an-nasl). This practice is identified as a multidimensional violation of the maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, namely the preservation of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), property (ḥifẓ al-māl), and the environment (ḥifẓ al-bī’ah). Furthermore, through a protective approach, the study highlights the necessity for governmental mining control through legal policies and corporate accountability. Meanwhile, a productive approach yields progressive actions in the form of innovative post-mining recovery and sustainable development.
The Epistemological Reconstruction of Tafsir bi al-Ijtihad in the Derivation of Islamic Law: An Analysis of Hasan’s Exegetical Principles Al Fahrizal; Ahmad Mahrus Mariadi; Muh. Ikbal Amsah; Agung Setiabudi
Ulumul Qur'an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Ulumul Qur'an: September 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al-Quran dan Tafsir STIU Darul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58404/juq.v6i2.936

Abstract

This study provides an in-depth analysis of a principle of exegetical method in Abdur Rokhim Hasan's work, namely al-tafsir bi al-ijtihad muhtaj fi istinbat al-ahkam (ijtihad-based interpretation is indispensable in deriving legal rulings). The research is motivated by the proliferation of subjective interpretations that disregard scholarly methodology and, the urgent need to develop a robust epistemological framework for interpreting legal verses (ayat al-ahkam). Using a qualitative library research method with a critical-manhaji approach and content analysis, this study evaluates the theoretical structure of the fourteenth principle and its supporting evidence. The main findings indicate that an exegete's ijtihad is not merely a secondary speculative option (zanni), but an absolute prerequisite for bridging some of limited wording (lafz) of the Quranic text and the unlimited complexity of human legal events. The authenticity of this principle is firmly supported by Surah Ali 'Imran verse 7, Surah al-Baqarah verse 228, the hadith concerning the dispatch of Mu'az ibn Jabal to Yemen, and the consensus of usul scholars. The practical application of this principle is demonstrated comparatively through an analysis of the differing interpretations of the homonymous term (lafz musytarak) quru' in Surah al-Baqarah verse 228 between the Hanafi and Syafi'i schools. The contribution of this article lies in its formulation of a clear demarcation between valid scholarly ijtihad (al-tafsir al-mahmud) and deviant desire-based interpretation (al-tafsir al-madzmum), while also purifying the systematics of exegetical principles from overlap with classical usul al-fiqh.
Co-Authors Agung Setiabudi Al Fahrizal Imamul Burhan Irfan Fauzi Muh. Ikbal Amsah Nur Arfiyah Febriani