Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

QAUL QADIM DAN QAUL JADID IMAM SYAFI’I: PEMBARUAN PEMIKIRAN HUKUM ISLAM DALAM KONTEKS QAUL QADIM DAN QAUL JADID RITONGA, HASIR BUDIMAN; KURNIAWAN, KURNIAWAN
HUKUMAH: Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 6, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : STAI Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55403/hukumah.v6i2.573

Abstract

Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor sosiologis yang mendasari lahirnya fatwa lama (qaul qadim) dan fatwa baru Imam Syafi'i. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan sosiologi hukum Islam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa lahirnya fatwa lama dan fatwa baru Imam Syafi'i disebabkan oleh perbedaan waktu dan kasus di daerah Bagdad dan Mesir ketika beliau menetap disana. Perbedaan fatwa untuk mengakomodir permasalahan hukum yang muncul saat ini dan hal ini memerlukan ijtihad, sehingga hukum Islam akan memberikan kontribusi yang nyata dan fungsional dalam mengantisipasi dinamika sosial dengan kompleksitas permasalahan yang berbeda-beda yang ditimbulkannya.
Mandailing And Angkola Semarga Marriage; Comparative Study Of Polemic Custom Law And Positive Law In Indonesia Affandi, Hazrul; Ritonga, Hasir Budiman; Ritonga, Raja
Islamic Circle Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Islamic Circle
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Ekonomi Syari'ah STAIN Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874/islamiccircle.v4i1.1920

Abstract

Marriage is part of realizing maqashid sharia, namely maintaining the continuity of offspring Traditional marriages in the Mandailing and Angkola communities have special values and rules. Customary violations can result in sanctions and fines from customary leaders. This article examines the polemic of semarga marriage among the Mandailing and Angkola tribes in the review of customary law and positive law in Indonesia. This research is qualitative research with a type of field research. Primary data collection is done through observation, interviews, and documentation. Meanwhile, secondary data is collected by tracing many references from books, articles, and other scientific works that are related to the research theme. Furthermore, the data were analyzed descriptively with a legal or normative approach. The results of the study explain that the same clan marriage in the Mandailing and Angkola ethnic communities has significant differences. Semarga marriages in the Angkola community are not subject to customary sanctions and fines. Meanwhile, semarga marriages in the Angkola community are subject to customary sanctions and fines. Meanwhile, the review of the Compilation of Islamic Law or positive law states that marriages are prohibited if marriages are carried out with mahrams or people who are prohibited from marrying.
Mandailing And Angkola Semarga Marriage; Comparative Study Of Polemic Custom Law And Positive Law In Indonesia Affandi, Hazrul; Ritonga, Hasir Budiman; Ritonga, Raja
Islamic Circle Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Islamic Circle
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Ekonomi Syari'ah STAIN Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874/islamiccircle.v4i1.1920

Abstract

Marriage is part of realizing maqashid sharia, namely maintaining the continuity of offspring Traditional marriages in the Mandailing and Angkola communities have special values and rules. Customary violations can result in sanctions and fines from customary leaders. This article examines the polemic of semarga marriage among the Mandailing and Angkola tribes in the review of customary law and positive law in Indonesia. This research is qualitative research with a type of field research. Primary data collection is done through observation, interviews, and documentation. Meanwhile, secondary data is collected by tracing many references from books, articles, and other scientific works that are related to the research theme. Furthermore, the data were analyzed descriptively with a legal or normative approach. The results of the study explain that the same clan marriage in the Mandailing and Angkola ethnic communities has significant differences. Semarga marriages in the Angkola community are not subject to customary sanctions and fines. Meanwhile, semarga marriages in the Angkola community are subject to customary sanctions and fines. Meanwhile, the review of the Compilation of Islamic Law or positive law states that marriages are prohibited if marriages are carried out with mahrams or people who are prohibited from marrying.
The Role of Customary Institutions in the Enforcement of Islamic Law in Padang Lawas Ritonga, Hasir Budiman; Hardana, Ali
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v3i4.1491

Abstract

The enforcement of Islamic law in Padang Lawas has its own characteristics because it is influenced by the existence of customary institutions that are still strong in people's lives. The background of this research problem departs from the phenomenon of customary practices that often coexist with Islamic law, but its role in resolving various social disputes has not been fully documented and understood. This research aims to analyze the role of customary institutions in the enforcement of Islamic law, understand customary-based and sharia-based case resolution mechanisms, and see the extent of the effectiveness of customary institutions in maintaining social order in Padang Lawas. The research method used is qualitative with a descriptive approach, through in-depth interviews with traditional leaders, scholars, and communities, as well as documentation studies on customary texts and customary deliberative decisions. The results of the study show that customary institutions play a role as the main mediator in resolving disputes between family, inheritance, and violations of social norms by prioritizing deliberation and the principle of restorative justice. In addition, customary institutions are able to harmonize Islamic and customary values so that law enforcement is created that is accepted by the community. This role is considered effective because it is deeply rooted in local culture and has high moral authority.