Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Eksekusi : Journal Of Law Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Audrianna Richella
Universitas Pelita Harapan
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AND THE PROTECTION OF RELIGIOUS HUMAN RIGHTS THROUGH GOOD GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES Audrianna Richella; Christian Indra Darmawan; Michelle Jesslyn
EKSEKUSI Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the effectiveness of the State Administrative Court (Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara/PTUN) in protecting religious human rights through the application of good governance principles (AAUPB). The urgency of this research lies in the gap between normative legal guarantees and empirical realities, particularly when final and binding court decisions (inkracht) are not implemented. This study analyzes the role of PTUN and the factors behind the ineffectiveness of its decisions. Using a qualitative literature-based approach, this research reviews legal doctrines, regulations, and cases such as GKI Yasmin and HKBP Filadelfia. The findings show that PTUN decisions are often hindered by maladministration, legal evasion, and administrative resistance, including delays and contradictory actions. Structural limitations and socio-political pressures further weaken enforcement. In conclusion, the protection of religious human rights remains largely formal. Strengthening enforcement mechanisms and consistent application of AAUPB are necessary to ensure effective legal protection. Keywords: State Administrative Court, Maladministration, Legal evasion, Religious human rights ABSTRAK Penelitian ini mengkaji efektivitas Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) dalam melindungi hak asasi manusia di bidang kebebasan beragama melalui penerapan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik (AAUPB). Urgensinya terletak pada kesenjangan antara hukum secara normatif dengan realitas, khususnya ketika putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap (inkracht) tidak dilaksanakan. Penelitian ini menganalisis peran PTUN serta faktor penyebab tidak efektifnya putusan. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan studi kepustakaan melalui analisis doktrin hukum, peraturan, dan kasus GKI Yasmin serta HKBP Filadelfia. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa putusan PTUN sering terhambat oleh maladministrasi, penyelundupan hukum, dan resistensi administratif seperti penundaan dan kebijakan yang bertentangan, serta diperparah oleh faktor struktural dan sosial-politik. Kesimpulannya, perlindungan HAM masih bersifat formal. Diperlukan penguatan eksekusi putusan dan penerapan AAUPB secara konsisten agar hukum berjalan efektif. Kata Kunci: Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Maladministrasi, Penyelundupan hukum, Hak asasi manusia
Legal Liability of Bottled Drinking Water Companies for Circulating Reusable Gallons Beyond Their Lifespan Nelvina Djaja; Audrianna Richella; Michelle Jesslyn; Jerry Shalmont
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol. 17 No. 2 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v17i2.17247

Abstract

This article analyses the legal liability of bottled drinking water (BDW) companies for circulating reusable gallon containers exceeding their technical lifespan, focusing on corporate-compliance failure and its consumer-protection implications. Normatively (das sollen), Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection guarantees consumers’ rights to comfort, security and safety; empirically (das sein), findings by the Indonesian Consumers Community (KKI) in late 2025 show that 57 per cent of reusable gallons circulating in Jabodetabek have exceeded their reasonable lifespan, exposing consumers to polycarbonate degradation and potential Bisphenol-A (BPA) migration. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study finds such practices constitute both a corporate-compliance failure and a violation of consumers’ rights under Articles 4, 7 and 8 of Law Number 8/1999. The absence of an explicit, quantitative lifespan standard is identified as a normative gap perpetuating information asymmetry between business actors and consumers. Compared with the European Union’s stricter BPA trajectory and neighbouring ASEAN jurisdictions, whose BPA bans remain confined to infant feeding bottles, Indonesia’s migration limit lags both international and regional consensus. The study recommends strengthening corporate compliance and internal control, together with regulatory reform establishing explicit lifespan and refill-cycle limits for reusable gallon containers.
Rekonstruksi Penilaian Hakim terhadap Audit Log sebagai Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Berdasarkan KUHAP Baru Nelvina Djaja; Eka Nurhikmah; Audrianna Richella; Michelle Jesslyn; Christian Indra Darmawan; Yuni Priskila Ginting
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v3i4.1886

Abstract

The digitalization of public procurement has caused procurement activities to be recorded not only in conventional documents but also in the form of audit logs that chronologically record user activities. Although audit logs have significant potential as electronic evidence in corruption cases involving public procurement, their use still faces issues concerning authenticity, integrity, chain of custody, system reliability, relevance, and attribution of activities to the defendant. This study aims to analyze the legal position of audit logs as electronic evidence and reconstruct judicial assessment of their evidentiary value based on Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (New Criminal Procedure Code). This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through library and document research. The findings show that audit logs are recognized as electronic evidence, but their existence does not automatically establish the defendant’s guilt. Judges should assess the authenticity of the data source, data integrity, system reliability, chain of custody, relevance of the recorded activities, attribution to the defendant, and consistency with other evidence. This reconstruction can establish a more measurable assessment standard and reduce legal uncertainty in the use of audit logs in public procurement corruption cases.
Pembuktian Akta Autentik dan Pengakuan Tertulis dalam Sengketa Perjanjian Sewa-Menyewa Ruko akibat Perubahan Struktur Bangunan Tanpa Izin Eka Nurhikmah; Nelvina Djaja; Audrianna Richella; Michelle Jesslyn; Christian Indra Darmawan; Yuni Priskila Ginting
Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Oktober: Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konstitusi.v3i4.2028

Abstract

Disputes arising from shop-house lease agreements may occur when tenants alter the building structure without the owner’s consent, resulting in legal issues concerning breach of contract and its evidentiary aspects in court. This study aims to analyze the evidentiary strength of authentic deeds and written admissions in lease disputes involving unauthorized structural alterations. The study employed a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results show that an authentic deed containing a prohibition against structural alterations has perfect and binding evidentiary force regarding the parties’ agreement, as stipulated in Article 1870 of the Indonesian Civil Code. In addition, the Defendant’s written admission in court concerning the removal of wall partitions may serve as evidence supporting the occurrence of an act contrary to the lease agreement. The authentic deed provides an evidentiary basis regarding the rights and obligations of the parties, while the admission strengthens the factual evidence of the prohibited conduct. Therefore, authentic deeds and written admissions have complementary functions in proving breaches of lease agreements and providing legal certainty for the parties in resolving disputes.   
Co-Authors Christian Indra Darmawan Eka Nurhikmah Michelle Jesslyn Nelvina Djaja Shalmont, Jerry Yuni Priskila Ginting