Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tunas Cendekia : Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Journal of Society Bridge West Science Law and Human Rights Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Punggawa Law Review
Riski Ananda Kusuma Putri
Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Reconstructing Reliability Standards for Deepfake Detectors as Electronic Evidence in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System Muhammad Abdul Azis; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Riski Ananda Kusuma Putri
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 4 No. 03 (2026): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v4i03.3022

Abstract

The development of deepfakes has transformed the evidentiary problem of video and audio from file authentication into an assessment of the computational method used to determine media authenticity. This study has two objectives: to examine the legal position and limits of the probative value of deepfake detector outputs under Indonesian criminal procedure and to reconstruct an AI Forensic Reliability Test that safeguards authenticity, scientific reliability, and procedural fairness. It applies normative legal research through statutory, conceptual, comparative, and interdisciplinary approaches. The first finding indicates that detector outputs may enter proceedings through electronic evidence, examination reports, and expert testimony, but they do not constitute independent evidence or binary statements of truth. Their value depends on object authenticity, lawful acquisition, methodological validity, error rates, and corroboration. The second finding develops an AI Forensic Reliability Test comprising eight dimensions: object authenticity, model validity, data quality, error rates and calibration, robustness and generalization, traceability and reproducibility, expert competence and independent testing, and procedural fairness and accountability. The framework operationalizes the negative statutory theory of proof, epistemic reliability, machine testimony, due process of law, equality of arms, and accountable algorithms
Causative-Based Integral Policy As A Response To Criminogenic Factors In The Distribution Of Subsidized Fuel Muhammad Abdul Azis; Siti Fadila Nuramelia; Muhammad Thufail Ariiq; Alya Synthia Kurniawati; Riski Ananda Kusuma Putri; Misshouw Meilany Putri; Dafirly Salsadilla Dosanto
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines how non-adaptive oil and gas regulations function as criminogenic factors in the distribution of subsidized fuel and formulates an integral policy recommendation to address the misuse of subsidized fuel. This research uses a normative juridical approach with doctrinal legal research. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively within a normative framework. The findings show that the misuse of subsidized fuel is not solely caused by individual wrongdoing, but is also triggered by the mismatch between regulation, socio-economic conditions, and public access to energy. This disharmony creates criminogenic conditions that encourage various forms of distributional deviation. Effective countermeasures require a combination of penal, non-penal, and social policy approaches.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pemerintah Atas Ketimpangan Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan dalam Pemenuhan Hak Atas Kesehatan di Indonesia Dafirly Salsadilla Dosanto; Riski Ananda Kusuma Putri; Alya Synthia Kurniawati; Muhammad Thufail Ariiq; Siti Fadila Nuramelia; Misshouw Meilany Putri; Muhammad Abdul Azis
Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Publisher : PT. ALHAFI BERKAH INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62007/joumi.v4i2.849

Abstract

Inequality in health care facilities remains a legal problem because the right to health requires health services to be available, accessible, qualified, and non-discriminatory. This study analyzes the legal construction of health facility inequality in fulfilling the right to health in Indonesia and formulates a prescriptive model for strengthening the responsibility of the central and local governments. This research uses normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, while the analysis is conducted descriptively and prescriptively. The study finds that health facility inequality cannot be reduced to differences in the number of facilities because it also concerns the distribution of authority, minimum service standards, availability of health workers, digital infrastructure, financing, referral systems, and supervision. Indonesian health law has regulated the government’s responsibility for equitable access, yet it has not fully established an accountability mechanism connecting equitable distribution with planning, budgeting, evaluation, and policy correction. This study proposes a rights-based accountability model for health facility equalization by integrating needs mapping, minimum standards, affirmative policy for vulnerable regions, data integration, participatory evaluation, and administrative incentives and sanctions.
Integrative Preventive-Protective Legal Framework untuk Lingkungan Belajar Aman pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini di Indonesia Riski Ananda Kusuma Putri; Muhammad Abdul Azis Azis; Alya Synthia Kurniawati; Muhammad Thufail Ariiq; Dafirly Salsadilla Dosanto
Tunas Cendekia : Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Tunas Cendekia : Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/tunascendekia.v9i1.12716

Abstract

Lingkungan belajar aman pada pendidikan anak usia dini tidak hanya ditentukan oleh kondisi fisik, tetapi juga oleh kualitas interaksi guru-anak, kebutuhan perkembangan dan inklusi, praktik digital, keterlibatan keluarga, serta kemampuan satuan pendidikan merespons risiko. Fragmentasi pembahasan mengenai unsur-unsur tersebut menyisakan kebutuhan akan kerangka yang mampu menghubungkan pencegahan, deteksi, perlindungan, pemulihan, dan evaluasi dalam satu sistem yang berorientasi pada PGPAUD. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis batas risiko yang perlu dikendalikan dalam lingkungan belajar pendidikan anak usia dini serta mengonstruksi Integrative Preventive-Protective Legal Framework yang sesuai dengan karakter perkembangan anak. Penelitian menggunakan desain konseptual-interdisipliner dengan literatur peer-reviewed bidang pendidikan anak usia dini sebagai sumber utama dan regulasi Indonesia sebagai sumber pendukung. Analisis dilakukan melalui identifikasi dimensi lingkungan belajar, pengelompokan risiko, pembedaan fungsi preventive dan protective, pemeriksaan batas tanggung jawab normatif, serta sintesis kerangka konseptual. Hasil penelitian mengidentifikasi lima domain risiko, yaitu fisik-operasional, kekerasan dan perlakuan salah, psikologis-relasional, digital dan data anak, serta kegagalan respons kelembagaan. Kerangka yang dihasilkan menempatkan inti substansi PGPAUD sebagai pusat pengelolaan risiko melalui kualitas proses belajar, interaksi guru-anak, dukungan perkembangan dan inklusi, serta kemitraan keluarga dan praktik digital. Fungsi preventive bekerja sebelum kerugian terjadi, sedangkan Deteksi atau Trigger Point mengaktifkan fungsi protective, pemulihan anak, dan evaluasi kelembagaan. Hukum ditempatkan sebagai ilmu bantu untuk memperjelas batas perlindungan dan tanggung jawab satuan pendidikan. Kontribusi penelitian terletak pada penguatan konsep lingkungan belajar aman sebagai proses dinamis yang mendukung keselamatan, kesejahteraan, partisipasi, keberlanjutan belajar, dan perbaikan kualitas praktik PAUD.
Algorithmic Governance of Online Prostitution: Limits of Platform Power and Protection Against Digital Stigma in Indonesia Muhammad Abdul Azis Azis; Riski Ananda Kusuma Putri; Alya Synthia Kurniawati; Muhammad Thufail Ariiq
Journal of Society Bridge Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Society Bridge
Publisher : Badan Koordinasi Kegiatan Kesejahteraan Sosial

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59012/jsb.v4i3.110

Abstract

The migration of prostitution practices to digital spaces has transformed platforms from communication intermediaries into controllers of visibility through ranking, recommendation, search, automated moderation, and distribution restrictions. Legal concerns emerge when algorithmic systems equate sexual indicators with prostitution, causing accounts offering sexual services, sexual-health education, victims of exploitation, bodily expression, or users sharing similar attributes to receive comparable moderation. This study examines the limits of platform power in governing content associated with online prostitution and formulates legal protection against digital stigma arising from algorithmic decisions. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and limited comparative approaches, the study finds that Indonesia’s electronic systems regime emphasizes governance, reporting, and access termination, while the Personal Data Protection Law recognizes objections to automated decisions with significant effects. However, neither regime provides integrated standards for classification validity, transparency, error rates, human oversight, or remediation. This article proposes the Algorithmic Visibility Accountability Test, covering legality of purpose, classification validity, contextuality, proportionality, traceability, human oversight, and post-decision remediation, to preserve legitimate platform enforcement while preventing unsupported association-based moderation and resulting digital stigma. It thereby links platform governance with accountable algorithmic decision-making and procedural protection for users.
Co-Authors Alya Synthia Kurniawati Dafirly Salsadilla Dosanto Misshouw Meilany Putri Muhammad Abdul Azis Muhammad Abdul Azis Azis Muhammad Thufail Ariiq Pujiyono Pujiyono Siti Fadila Nuramelia