Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Gema Wiralodra JUSTICES: Journal of Law Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies
I Ketut Astawa
Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Cyber law analysis of E-KTP data leakage: A case approach of 102 million KTP data allegedly leaked from the Ministry of Social Affairs to a hacker forum Richart Sahatatua; Yenrizka Gusmaria; I Ketut Astawa; Ade Maman Suherman; Try Setiady; Wahyu Donri Tinambunan
Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): August
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jomaps.v2i3.2219

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the legal implications and cybersecurity vulnerabilities surrounding the leak of 102 million electronic identity (E-KTP) records allegedly originating from the Indonesian Ministry of Social Affairs. It highlights the urgency of improving data protection mechanisms in the era of digital governance. Research methodology: The research adopts a qualitative document analysis method, collecting and examining data from laws, government regulations, academic literature, credible news sources, and case studies related to cybercrime and information security. An interdisciplinary approach is applied, integrating perspectives from law, information technology, and cybersecurity. Results: The study reveals that the current regulatory framework is insufficient to fully address the growing risks of data breaches in public digital infrastructures. It identifies critical gaps in cybersecurity readiness, institutional accountability, and legal enforcement related to personal data protection. Conclusions: Strengthening personal data protection in Indonesia requires a combination of stricter regulatory enforcement, increased public awareness, technological investment, and cross-sector collaboration. The legal system must adapt more proactively to emerging digital threats. Limitations: This research is limited to secondary data sources and does not include interviews or empirical fieldwork, which may restrict the depth of analysis on institutional practices. Contribution: This paper contributes to the development of cyber law discourse in Indonesia by offering legal and policy recommendations aimed at enhancing data privacy, institutional responsibility, and public trust in digital identity systems.
The Best Strategy For Dealing With Business Conflicts: Strategic Choices In Drafting Clauses In Arbitration Agreements And The Application Of Expedited Procedures Adhi Gani Wiguna; Teuku Syahrul Ansari; I Ketut Astawa; Tri Setiady
Gema Wiralodra Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024): Gema Wiralodra
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/gw.v15i2.535

Abstract

Arbitration or the root word in (Latin) ''arbitrare'' means "the process or method of deciding a dispute through an independent arbitrator or referee". This definition is one of them because legal experts have different opinions or views even though their opinions have the same meaning. Talking about arbitration or arbitration institutions, there has actually been and has been practiced throughout the centuries for the first time introduced by the Greek community before Christ. As for Indonesia, arbitration is known and recognized by citizens as an alternative to problem solving through non-litigation. Alternative dispute resolution, such as arbitration and mediation, is now a popular choice in resolving business conflicts. The method used to collect data is by conducting literature searches published in scientific research articles and journals. The literature search was conducted using several loaded search engines, such as Google Scholar, Pubmed, and Science Direct.  This method is an alternative that is considered more effective and efficient than going through the courts, because the process is faster, lower costs, and the resulting decisions are final and binding. The purpose of this study is how to choose a strategy in drafting clauses in the Arbitration agreement for dispute resolution
Capital Market Analysis of the Asabri Corruption Scandal: Investment Manipulation Causing State Losses of Up to IDR 23.73 Trillion Yenrizka Gusmaria; I Ketut Astawa
JUSTICES: Journal of Law Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/justices.v5i3.227

Abstract

The corruption scandal involving PT Asabri (Persero) has become one of the biggest cases in Indonesian financial history, with state losses reaching IDR 23.73 trillion. This case began with the manipulation of investment fund management in the period 2011 to 2019, carried out by Asabri management in collaboration with external parties, Benny Tjokrosaputro (Bentjok), Heru Hidayat, and LP. The two main directors of Asabri during that period, ARD and SW, made an agreement with the three parties to manage the company's investment portfolio, which included stocks and mutual funds whose values ​​had been manipulated. In this transaction, the stocks purchased by Asabri were priced higher than their actual value, and after entering the portfolio, the transaction was carried out to benefit external parties in a false manner, which was detrimental to the company. This manipulation also involved the sale of shares at a lower price, which ultimately harmed Asabri. The losses were further exacerbated by the purchase of manipulated shares through mutual funds controlled by the same party. The results of the audit by the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) show that the total state loss due to this scandal reached Rp 23.73 trillion. This case reflects the weak supervision in the management of state pension funds and is a valuable lesson in efforts to prevent corruption in the future.
Co-Authors Ade Maman Suherman Adhi Gani Wiguna Richart Sahatatua Teuku Syahrul Ansari Tri Setiady Try Setiady Wahyu Donri Tinambunan Yenrizka Gusmaria