Aab Abdul Jamalul Lael
Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Implikasi Frasa ‘Masih Ada’ Pasal 3 Uupa bagi Pengakuan Masyarakat Adat dan Kebijakan “Ius Constituendum” Ilham Muhammad Zain; Aab Abdul Jamalul Lael; Khoirul Abdul Aziz; Tevan Agus Setiawan; Exsyel Hendy Basuki; Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 3 (2026): Tema Hukum Adat dan Kebiasaan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i3.3067

Abstract

The phrase "sepanjang menurut kenyataannya masih ada" in Article 3 of the UUPA creates normative ambiguity that places indigenous peoples in a vulnerable position. This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of the phrase and formulate ius constituendum policies. The discussion results indicate that this phrase is a transitional arrangement resulting in sectoral regulatory fragmentation and complex administrative burdens of proof for indigenous peoples. In conclusion, a paradigm shift from conditional to inherent recognition is required. Future policies must remove the phrase, adopt self-identification principles and harmonize regulations to ensure legal certainty and justice for indigenous peoples.