Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Khoirul Abdul Aziz
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Implikasi Frasa ‘Masih Ada’ Pasal 3 Uupa bagi Pengakuan Masyarakat Adat dan Kebijakan “Ius Constituendum” Ilham Muhammad Zain; Aab Abdul Jamalul Lael; Khoirul Abdul Aziz; Tevan Agus Setiawan; Exsyel Hendy Basuki; Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 3 (2026): Tema Hukum Adat dan Kebiasaan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i3.3067

Abstract

The phrase "sepanjang menurut kenyataannya masih ada" in Article 3 of the UUPA creates normative ambiguity that places indigenous peoples in a vulnerable position. This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of the phrase and formulate ius constituendum policies. The discussion results indicate that this phrase is a transitional arrangement resulting in sectoral regulatory fragmentation and complex administrative burdens of proof for indigenous peoples. In conclusion, a paradigm shift from conditional to inherent recognition is required. Future policies must remove the phrase, adopt self-identification principles and harmonize regulations to ensure legal certainty and justice for indigenous peoples.
Konstitusionalitas Pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara dalam Perspektif Living Constitution: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 34/PUUXX/2022 dan Implikasinya terhadap Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Exsyel Hendy Basuki; Windya Nopryanti; Khoirul Abdul Aziz; Ilham Muhammad Zain; Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan; Febrian Indar Surya Kusuma
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 3 (2026): Tema Hukum Adat dan Kebiasaan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i3.3402

Abstract

The relocation of Indonesia's capital city to Ibu Kota Nusantara through Law Number 3 of 2022 triggered the largest wave of judicial review in Indonesian constitutional history. This article analyzes the constitutionality of this policy through the lens of living constitution theory, focusing on the ratio decidendi of Constitutional Court Decision Number 34/PUU-XX/2022. Using normative legal research with statutory, case and conceptual approaches, it finds that the Court employed judicial restraint via the open legal policy doctrine, yet applied the meaningful participation parameter inconsistently compared to Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. The ruling carries ambivalent implications for SDG 11 and SDG 16.
Co-Authors Aab Abdul Jamalul Lael Exsyel Hendy Basuki Febrian Indar Surya Kusuma Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan Ilham Muhammad Zain Tevan Agus Setiawan Windya Nopryanti