Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Tarbiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan (The Educational Journal)
Muslih Rifandani
Universitas Tadulako

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of Quizizz-assisted natural and social sciences (IPAS) learning in relation to learning-style preference categories of fifth-grade students at SD Inpres Perumnas Palu Muslih Rifandani; Nasrullah Nasrullah; Muslim AR; Arif Firmansyah; Ryan Andhika Pratama
AL-TARBIYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan (The Educational Journal) Vol. 36 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan (FITK) UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/8wz3ck09

Abstract

This study explored Quizizz-assisted Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS) learning in relation to learning-style preference categories among fifth-grade students at SD Inpres Perumnas Palu. A qualitative descriptive design was used. Thirty students were invited to complete a learning-style questionnaire, and 28 responses were used to identify visual, auditory, and kinesthetic categories. One student from each category and the classroom teacher participated in classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documentation. Data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The visual-category participant was particularly engaged by images, colors, animations, and the leaderboard. The auditory-category participant described Quizizz as enjoyable but still relied on direct teacher explanations to understand new material. The kinesthetic-category participant was more active during the quiz activity and responded positively to competition, although teacher guidance remained important. At the class level, Quizizz supported an active formative-assessment atmosphere, but limited Chromebook availability and unstable internet connectivity constrained implementation. These findings are context-specific descriptions of participants’ preferences and experiences; they do not demonstrate that matching instruction to learning styles improves learning outcomes.
Co-Authors Huber Yaspin Tandi, Elfika Arif Firmansyah Muslim AR Nasrullah Nasrullah Ryan Andhika Pratama