Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Authority of Surabaya City Government regarding Amending Fund Budget of Village Yuliana, Fitri; Sesung, Rusdianto
Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies Том 2 № 02 (2024): Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies
Publisher : PT. Riset Press International

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59653/jplls.v2i02.629

Abstract

The village is part of the Sub-district formed by Regency / City Regional Regulation led by a head called Head of Village as a Sub-district apparatus responsible to the District Head. The Head of Village is appointed by the Regent/Mayor on the proposal of the Regional Secretary and Civil Servants who meet the requirements by the provisions of the Laws and Regulations which assist the duties of the Sub-District Head in carrying out village government activities, carrying out community empowerment, implementing community services, maintaining public peace and order, and so on. The limits of the Surabaya City Government's authority in making changes to the Fund Budget of Village must be by Government Regulation Number 17 of 2018 Article 30 where changes to the Fund Budget of Village are not less than 5% of the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget after deducting the Special Allocation Fund. In addition, the determination and management of the Fund Budget of Village must be transparent, including when the Surabaya City Government makes changes, they must still be based on Government Regulation Number 17 of 2018 and Law Number 1 of 2022, wherein Law Number 1 of 2022 Article 173a states that the Government can require Regions to prioritize the use of budget allocations for specific activities (refocusing), changes in allocations, and changes in the use of the APBD, and the Government can adjust the maximum amount of the APBD deficit and Regional Debt Financing. Legal conformity in managing the Fund Budget of the Village has been stated in Law Number 23 of 2014, Article 1, Paragraph 47, and Law Number 130 of 2018, Article 1, Paragraph 8. Other legal conformity in managing the Fund Budget of Village is also stated in Government Regulation Number 17 of 2018 Article 30, Paragraphs 6 and 7, and in Law Number 1 of 2022 Article 1, Paragraph 75.
Issuance of Building Approval (PBG) for Development on Land Affected by Street Plans in Surabaya City Fatmawati, Ida; Sesung, Rusdianto
Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies Том 2 № 03 (2024): Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies
Publisher : PT. Riset Press International

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59653/jplls.v2i03.1062

Abstract

This research examines the issuance of Building Approval (PBG) for developments on land affected by road plans in Surabaya City, focusing on the legal consequences and status of such buildings. Employing a normative legal research methodology, the study scrutinizes relevant laws and regulations, including Surabaya Mayor Regulation Number 34 of 2023 and Government Regulation (PP) Number 16 of 2021. The findings reveal that buildings erected on government land without the required IMB or PBG are in violation of these regulations, which may result in their demolition and a lack of legal protection. The study highlights that unauthorized constructions disrupt urban planning and entail legal repercussions under the Job Creation Law, Article 29 Paragraph 1 point c. Buildings lacking IMB and PBG are subject to demolition as they are considered invalid without regional government authorization. The research emphasizes the necessity for rigorous supervision by the Mayor of Surabaya to ensure compliance. Additionally, it explores the broader significance of these permits as essential steps in converting urban spatial policies into operational frameworks, pivotal for road development and urban planning.
ANALISIS YURIDIS EKSEKUSI JAMINAN KREDITUR LELANG HAK TANGGUNGAN TERHADAP OBJEK BERPENGHUNI Iswara, Firda Ramadhanty; Sesung, Rusdianto
Perspektif Vol. 27 No. 3 (2022): Edisi September
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v27i3.839

Abstract

Pembayaran hutang kreditur dilaksanakan dengan objek jaminan hak tanggungan yang dilakukan berdasarkan pelelangan umum. Pelelangan merupakan perbuatan hukum yang memaksa dan berperan penting untuk penyelesaian permasalahan perdata dapat dilaksanakan di Pengadilan Negeri dan KPKNL. Dalam pelaksanaannya kedudukan dalam mengeksekusi jaminan kredit yang tidak melakukan prestasi dapat dilaksanakan melalui kantor lelang dilakukan secara terbuka akan sangat menguntungkan. Namun problematika terhadap kegiatan lelang seringkali rumit, dikarenakan objek pelelangan adalah jaminan terhadap kredit yang tetap tidak dalam pemenuhan prestasi. Hal itu dikarenakan pemenang lelang objek dengan hak jaminan terhadap suatu kredit yang tidak terpenuhi prestasinya diambilalihkan tetapi dalam kenyataannya objek lelangnya berpenghuni. Sepanjang terdapat itikad baik dari semula oleh pembeli dan persyaratan pembeliannya sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan, hukum akan melindungi hak dari pembeli lelang dan pemenang yang mendapatkan objek lelang eksekusi dengan hak tanggungan berpatokan pada grosse atau akta kutipan risalah lelang.Payment of creditors’ debts is carried out with the object of guarantee of mortgages which is carried out through public auctions. The auction is a legal act that compels and its very important role in resolving civil problems can be carried out by the District Court and the KPKNL. In practice, the position of executing credit guarantees that do not perform well can be implemented through the auction office carried out openly will be very profitable. However, the problem with auction activities is often complicated, because the object being auctioned is a guarantee for credit which is still not fulfilling the achievement. This is because the winner of the auction of the object with collateral rights for a credit whose achievements are not fulfilled is taken over but in reality the object of the auction is inhabited. As long as there is good faith from the beginning by the buyer and the purchase requirements are in accordance with the laws and regulations, the law will protect the rights of the auction buyer and the winner / who gets the object of the execution auction with the mortgage based on the grosse or the deed of quotation of the minutes of the auction.
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH YANG HILANG AKIBAT PENCURIAN DITINJAU DARI HUKUM PERDATA Qumarudin, Jeffri; Sesung, Rusdianto
Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Volume 8 Number 1 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33121/hukumbisnis.v8i1.2828

Abstract

A notary is an official who has the authority to make authentic deeds. The authentic deed itself functions as the most perfect piece of evidence in court, in the event of preservation of related rights and obligations. With the authority granted by law and the trust of the people served through legal traffic, it cannot be denied that in the process of transferring names, you will certainly receive a mandate from the applicant to keep the certificate of title to the land. In this research, the author analyzes the authority and responsibilities of Notaries in storing certificates of land rights lost due to theft. The type of research used is normative juridical or library research. The approach method is a statutory-regulatory approach, which means the approach is carried out by examining all laws and regulations related to the legal issue being handled. Basically, the notary himself does not have the authority to store land title certificates. This attitude is a form of neutral attitude that the notary has towards the parties to ensure legal certainty and protection. so that the notary indirectly assumes responsibility for storing land title certificates, including the obligation to safeguard the certificates, with the trust given by the parties. So that the Notary's form of responsibility must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Article 1706 of the Civil Code (BW), which regulates that the Notary is also required to maintain and guard the certificate. The notary is obliged to compensate for damage or loss of land title certificates as reflected in Article 1694 of the Civil Code (BW). Thus, the notary's responsibility for land title certificates lost due to theft can be carried out in the form of compensation in the form of a replacement certificate. Keywords: Liability, theft, replacement certificate
Kewajiban Notaris Membacakan Akta Autentik Bagi Penghadap Disabilitas Rungu Analisis Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Sesung, Rusdianto; Putri, Ria Riani
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10695

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the obligation of Notaries to read authentic deeds for deaf parties. The limited access of deaf parties to the process of making authentic deeds is due to the absence of translators or facilitators who understand their needs in communicating. This problem is important because of the potential for the failure to fulfill the validity of authentic deeds and the protection of the rights of deaf parties. The normative legal method is used in this study through a legal approach to analyze the obligation of Notaries to read authentic deeds for deaf parties. The updates in this study show that Notaries have an important responsibility in reading authentic deeds to the parties involved as stipulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter (l) of the Notary Law. However, until now, the Notary Law (UUJN) has not expressly regulated the obligation of Notaries to provide sign language interpreters for clients with deaf disabilities, which is a form of solution for deaf parties. The results of the study indicate that there is a regulatory gap that does not fully cover Notaries in handling the special needs of people with hearing disabilities, which in turn can cause potential problems related to the validity and authenticity of authentic deeds. This study concludes that changes are needed to the UUJN which explicitly requires Notaries to provide sign language interpreters for people with hearing disabilities. Penelitian ini memberikan tujuan untuk melakukan analisis kewajiban Notaris membacakan akta autentik bagi penghadap disabilitas rungu. Keterbatasan akses penghadap disabilitas rungu terhadap proses pembuatan akta autentik sebagai akibat dari ketiadaan penerjemah atau fasilitator yang memahami kebutuhan mereka dalam berkomunikasi. Masalah ini menjadi penting karena adanya potensi tidak terpenuhinya keabsahan akta autentik dan perlindungan hak dari penghadap disabilitas rungu. Pada penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif untuk melakukan analisis kewajiban Notaris membacakan akta autentik bagi penghadap disabilitas rungu. Pembaharuan dalam penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa Notaris memiliki tanggung jawab yang penting dalam membacakan akta autentik kepada para pihak yang terlibat sebagaimana Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf (l) UUJN. Namun hingga saat ini, UU Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) belum secara tegas mengatur kewajiban Notaris dalam menyediakan juru bahasa isyarat bagi klien dengan disabilitas rungu yang merupakan bentuk solusi untuk penghadap disabilitas rungu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kekosongan regulasi yang belum mencakup sepenuhnya bagi Notaris dalam menangani kebutuhan khusus para penyandang disabilitas rungu, yang pada gilirannya dapat menimbulkan potensi permasalahan terkait validitas dan keaslian akta autentik. Penelitian ini memberikan kesimpulan bahwa diperlukan perubahan pada UUJN yang secara tegas kewajiban Notaris menyediakan juru bahasa isyarat bagi penghadap disabilitas rungu.
Pembatasan Jumlah Pembuatan Akta Notaris Oleh Dewan Kehormatan Pusat Ikatan Notaris Indonesia Kartikosari, Heni; Sesung, Rusdianto
Jurnal Panorama Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2017): Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (469.125 KB) | DOI: 10.21067/jph.v2i2.1855

Abstract

Untuk melindungi Jabatan Notaris dan mayarakat yang menggunakan jasa Notaris terkait kepastian hukum dari akta yang dibuat oleh Notaris, Dewan Kehormatan Pusat Ikatan Notaris Indonesia mengeluarkan Peraturan Dewan Kehormatan Pusat Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Tentang Batas Kewajaran Jumlah Pembuatan Akta Perhari. Dalam peraturan tersebut ditentukan oleh Dewan Kehormatan Pusat bahwa batas kewajaran dalam pembuatan akta per hari adalah sebanyak 20 (dua puluh) akta. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau bahan hukum sekunder sedangkan dalam mencari dan mengumpulkan data dilakukan dengan dua pendekatan, yaitu pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwaDewan Kehormatan mempunyai kewenangan untuk membuat peraturan dalam rangka penegakan Kode Etik Notaris berdasarkan Anggaran Dasar dan Kode Etik Ikatan Notaris Indonesia. Pembuatan peraturan tersebut dilakukan bersama-sama oleh Dewan Kehormatan Pusat dan Pengurus Pusat Ikatan Notaris Indonesia.Notaris yang melanggar ketentuan Peraturan Dewan Kehormatan Pusat dapat dijatuhi sanksi berupateguran, peringatan, pemberhentian sementara dan pemberhentian tetap dari keanggotaan Perkumpulan.
KEDUDUKAN KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH KOTA SURABAYA UNTUK TIDAK MEMBERIKAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK KEPADA SUAMI YANG DIPUTUS BERCERAI OLEH PENGADILAN AGAMA SEBELUM KEWAJIBAN NAFKAH DIPENUHI Franklin, Yohanes; Sesung, Rusdianto
Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 9 No 1 (2025): Volume 9 No 1 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Licensing is one form of administrative public service provided by the government to the community. To ensure the fulfillment of rights and legal certainty for the community in obtaining licensing services, the government, especially the regional government, has prepared service standards which are stated in the form of a Regional Head Decree or a Regional Apparatus Head Decree. However, the right to obtain licensing services can be limited if there is a court decision that has permanent legal force ordering the regional government not to provide licensing services to a person or legal entity. In order to protect the rights of women and children after divorce, the Surabaya City Government and the Surabaya City Religious Court have made an agreement containing a policy not to provide public services including licensing services to husbands who have not fulfilled their obligation to provide support based on a court decision issued by the Surabaya City Religious Court. The legal issue of concern is the validity of the contents of the Surabaya City Religious Court Decision considering that divorce cases are cases of the parties and the regional government is not a party to the case. Based on general legal principles, judges in deciding cases are prohibited from taking legal action without legal authority. In this case, the divorce dispute filed by the parties only discusses the resolution of the dispute that occurs between the parties. With the existence of the Surabaya City Religious Court Decision which has permanent legal force, the Surabaya City Government is bound not to provide licensing services. Keywords: Licensing Services; Regional Government Policy; Protection of Women and Children
KEWENANGAN GUBERNUR SEBAGAI WAKIL PEMERINTAH PUSAT DALAM MELAKUKAN EVALUASI TERHADAP PERATURAN DAERAH KABUPATEN/KOTA TENTANG RENCANA TATA RUANG WILAYAH Sundari, Siti; Sesung, Rusdianto
Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Volume 9 no 2 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The evaluation of the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW) by the Governor aims to ensure that spatial policies at the district/city level are not only in accordance with local interests, but also support the national development agenda and maintain balance between regions. Compliance with national policies means that every policy taken by the regional government must be in line with the laws and regulations set by the central government. In its implementation, the evaluation process often faces several obstacles. Problems arise, there are differences in interpretation of regulations between the central and regional governments, and resistance from district/city governments who feel that their authority is being intervened. There is a conflict of interest between the central government, provincial government and district/city government in the preparation of the RTRW. In this case, the Governor must be able to balance the interests of the various parties in carrying out his evaluation duties. So it is necessary to emphasize a strong basis in terms of the limitations of the Governor's authority as a Representative of the Central Government in evaluating the Regency/City Regional Regulation on the Regional Spatial Plan, and it is necessary to know the legal consequences of the Regency/City Regional Regulation on the Regional Spatial Plan that are not in accordance with the results of the Governor's evaluation as a representative of the Central Government. Keywords: Authority of the Governor; Governor's Evaluation; Evaluation of the Regional Spatial Plan.
Digitalisasi Fidusia dan Kenotariatan: Solusi Hukum Modern di Era Cyber: DIGITALISASI FIDUSIA DAN KENOTARIATAN: SOLUSI HUKUM MODERN DI ERA CYBER Riska, Apriani; Sesung, Rusdianto
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i1.3506

Abstract

Digitalization of fiduciary and notary is a strategic step in modernizing the legal system to answer the need for efficiency and transparency in the digital era. This research is motivated by the slow process of fiduciary registration and manual document attestation which is often considered inefficient and not in accordance with the demands of modern technology. This research aims to identify impacts, challenges, and solutions in the implementation of digital systems, including electronic signatures and blockchain, to support fiduciary and notary transformation. With qualitative methods, this research involves literature studies, interviews with 25 legal practitioners, and analysis of the application of digital technology in developed countries such as Estonia and Singapore. The results show that digitalization can cut the time for fiduciary registration from five working days to less than 24 hours, as well as increase transparency through real-time tracking. However, challenges in the form of technological resistance, infrastructure limitations, and data security issues remain obstacles. Blockchain is considered a potential solution for maintaining document integrity, but it requires large investments and strong regulation. In conclusion, the digitization of fiduciary and notary has great potential to improve efficiency, transparency, and security. The success of this transformation depends on the equitable distribution of infrastructure, education, and harmonization of regulations to ensure the legal validity of digital documents in the cyber era.
Legal Certainty of Using Indonesian Language in Notarial Deeds Keristion, Keristion; Sesung, Rusdianto
Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): JHK-February
Publisher : PT. Hafasy Dwi Nawasena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61942/jhk.v2i2.278

Abstract

Indonesian is the official language of the country used in various aspects of life, including in law and official documents. The use of Indonesian in notarial deeds is important because notarial deeds are legal products that have binding force. This research is entitled “Legal Certainty in the Use of Indonesian in Notarial Deeds”, which aims to examine the extent to which legal certainty is guaranteed in the use of Indonesian in deeds made by notaries. Notaries have an important role in ensuring that the deeds made meet legal requirements, including the use of clear language that does not cause ambiguity. The use of Indonesian language in notarial deeds has been regulated in various laws and regulations. Law No. 24/2009 on the Flag, Language and State Emblem requires the use of Indonesian language in official state documents. Compliance with this provision aims to provide legal protection for the parties involved in the agreement or legal agreement. With this research, it is hoped that it can provide a deeper understanding of how legal certainty can be guaranteed through the use of Indonesian language in notarial deeds and its implications for legal protection for the community.