Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Pinsip Kehati-hatian Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pengurusan Peralihan Tanah Letter C Wanda, Hendry Dwicahyo; Sesung, Rusdianto
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 7 No. 2 (2017): Oktober 2017
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (451.772 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2017.7.2.444-465

Abstract

Abstract: Land Acquisition Officer (PPAT) is often required to make the transfer of land right Letter C. As an official making an authentic deed, PPAT must have a precautionary attitude and good precision so that the deed made can guarantee the right of land for the community. In handling the land transfer of Letter C, PPAT needs to apply prudential principles in order to avoid problems in the future. PPAT should pay attention to the management in the kelurahan (officer in the level of village) associated with checking Letter C objects, documents related to the object, the identity of the parties, and permit applications. PPAT also needs to be careful in the management of the National Land Agency. The precautionary principles of PPAT are in need in order to avoid some possible problems in the future. It can also clarify the status of the object of sale and purchase, to avoid errors in the deed of sale of land made by PPAT, to create suitability of the contents of the deed of sale and purchase of land with legal deed taking place. These principles will maintain the dignity of the PPAT position and support the quality of work in making the deed and public services. Abstrak: Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) seringkali diminta melakukan pengurusan peralihan hak atas tanah Letter C. Sebagai pejabat yang membuat akta autentik, PPAT harus memiliki sikap kehati-hatian dan ketelitian yang baik agar akta yang dibuat dapat memberikan jaminan hak atas tanah bagi masyarakat. Dalam pengurusan peralihan hak atas tanah Letter C, PPAT perlu menerapkan prinsip kehati-hatian agar tidak terjadi permasalahan di kemudian hari. PPAT harus memperhatikan pengurusan di kelurahan/desa terkait dengan pengecekan obyek Letter C, dokumen terkait dengan objek, identitas para pihak, dan permohonan izin. PPAT juga perlu berhati-hati dalam pengurusan di Badan Pertanahan Nasional. Prinsip kehati-hatian perlu diterapkan dalam rangka menghindarkan PPAT dari permasalahan yang mungkin terjadi di kemudian hari, memperjelas status obyek jual beli, menghindarkan kesalahan dalam akta jual beli tanah yang dibuat oleh PPAT, dan menciptakan kesesuaian isi akta jual beli tanah dengan perbuatan hukum yang terjadi. Dengan prinsip kehati-hatian akan menjaga harkat dan martabat jabatan PPAT serta mendukung kualitas kerja dalam pembuatan akta dan pelayanan masyarakat.
Management of Drinking Water Supply System: Authority of Regional Government and Legality of Management by Business Entities Sesung, Rusdianto; Hadi, Syofyan; Riqiey, Baharuddin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5085

Abstract

Private water resource control generally tends to follow capitalist and liberal market mechanisms which will result in a large consumer burden. If it follows capitalist and liberal market mechanisms, then what happens is profit oriented compared to fulfilling the needs and prosperity of the community or many people. Based on these problems, this study focuses on the Authority of Regional Governments in managing the Drinking Water Supply System. This study is a legal study using a legislative and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that Regional Governments have the authority to manage the Drinking Water Supply System. This is none other than because of the form of state control over water as regulated in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia by forming a BUMD or UPTD. In addition, if an area does not yet have drinking water services by a BUMD or UPTD, the implementation of SPAM by the business entity is legally valid. Conversely, if an area already has drinking water services by a BUMD or UPTD, the implementation of SPAM by the business entity is not legally valid.
Transformasi Digital Dalam Praktik Kenotariatan: Implementasi Sertifikat Elektronik Untuk Akta Otentik Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Tri Rosyida, Maulita; Sesung, Rusdianto; Adjie, Habib
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Digital transformation has rapidly penetrated various sectors, notably including notarial practices across Indonesia. This article is dedicated to analyzing the practical implementation of electronic certificates when notaries manufacture authentic deeds. The analysis refers specifically to Law No. 2 of 2014, which amends the Notary Position Law (UUJN), and examines its relationship with the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE). The adoption of electronic certificates and electronic signatures (TTE) holds significant promise, aiming for efficiency, speed, and enhanced security of legal documents, fully aligning with the modern concept of "Cyber Notary". Nevertheless, this study revealed a critical finding: a normative discrepancy exists. While the UUJN still conservatively mandates physical presence and written form, the ITE Law boldly acknowledges the validity of electronic documents. This regulatory gap is consequential. The absence of explicit regulations concerning electronic authenticated deeds created by notaries directly results in legal uncertainty regarding the deed's strength of proof. Consequently, we assert the urgent need for harmonizing regulations. Developing an integrated digital infrastructure is also vital to guarantee legal certainty and protection for both the public and notaries as they navigate the digital era.