Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (SNLPR)
Adji Annisa Rahmadina
Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Impact of Modern Medical Technology on the Transformation of Healthcare Service Contract Structures from Conventional Face-to-Face Contracts to Digital Contracts: An Indonesian Health Law Perspective Adji Annisa Rahmadina; Prassetyo Edi
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.1039

Abstract

The rapid integration of digital technologies into healthcare has fundamentally reshaped the legal framework governing healthcare service delivery. Medical consultations, informed consent, health records, prescriptions, and payment systems are increasingly conducted through electronic platforms, altering the manner in which legal relationships between patients and healthcare providers are established and performed. This transformation raises important legal issues concerning the validity of electronic healthcare contracts, the legal status of therapeutic agreements concluded in digital environments, the protection of personal health data, and the allocation of legal responsibility among healthcare professionals, healthcare institutions, and electronic system providers. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. Primary legal materials include the Indonesian Civil Code, Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health, Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, and Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions as last amended by Law Number 1 of 2024. The study demonstrates that the digitalisation of healthcare services does not alter the juridical nature of the therapeutic agreement as the legal basis of the physician–patient relationship. Digitalisation instead transforms the structure of healthcare service contracts by introducing electronic consent, electronic medical records, digital evidence, and multiple contractual actors whose rights and obligations extend beyond the traditional relationship between patients and healthcare professionals. Existing legal provisions have yet to provide a comprehensive framework governing these evolving contractual relationships. A reconstruction of healthcare service contracts is therefore required to accommodate digital healthcare practices while preserving legal certainty, safeguarding patients' rights, ensuring personal data protection, and maintaining accountability within Indonesia's healthcare system.
Quo Vadis Integritas Profesi Advokat: Kerahasiaan Informasi Klien Versus Kepentingan Umum Hidayati Hidayati; Adji Annisa Rahmadina; Angga Perwira Sukmawinata; Dewi Indrayani; Afnas Rachmawati; Emma Choerunnisa
Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (Agustus - Oktober 2026)
Publisher : Greenation Publisher & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jgsp.v4i3.678

Abstract

Profesi advokat menempati posisi strategis dalam sistem peradilan sebagai salah satu unsur penegak hukum yang bertugas menjamin perlindungan hak konstitusional warga negara. Pelaksanaan fungsi tersebut memerlukan jaminan independensi profesi melalui pemberian hak imunitas serta kewajiban menjaga kerahasiaan informasi klien. Keberadaan hak imunitas bertujuan memberikan perlindungan terhadap advokat ketika menjalankan tugas profesi berdasarkan itikad baik. Perkembangan praktik penegakan hukum menunjukkan munculnya persoalan mengenai penyalahgunaan hak imunitas sebagai sarana melakukan perbuatan yang menghambat proses peradilan (obstruction of justice). Kondisi tersebut memunculkan konflik antara kewajiban menjaga kerahasiaan informasi klien dengan kepentingan umum dalam mewujudkan penegakan hukum yang efektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis batasan hak imunitas advokat dalam perspektif kepentingan umum serta mengkaji parameter yuridis yang membedakan tindakan pembelaan hukum yang sah dengan perbuatan obstruction of justice. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, serta pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hak imunitas advokat bukan merupakan hak absolut. Keberlakuannya bergantung pada terpenuhinya unsur itikad baik dalam pelaksanaan profesi. Tindakan advokat yang mengarah pada upaya merintangi penyidikan, penuntutan, maupun persidangan mengakibatkan gugurnya perlindungan imunitas profesi. Kepentingan umum memperoleh legitimasi konstitusional sebagai dasar pembatasan kerahasiaan informasi klien sepanjang dilakukan berdasarkan undang-undang guna menjaga integritas sistem peradilan pidana.
Co-Authors Afnas Rachmawati Angga Perwira Sukmawinata Dewi Indrayani Emma Choerunnisa Hidayati Hidayati Prassetyo Edi