Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (SNLPR)
Dewi Indrayani
Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Medical Records as Evidence of the Performance of Obligations in Therapeutic Agreements: An Analysis of Legal Certainty and Legal Protection in Indonesian Hospital Services Dewi Indrayani; Prassetyo Edi
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.1041

Abstract

Advances in healthcare technology have significantly improved the quality of medical services through the increasing use of sophisticated medical devices. However, medical device failures may cause substantial harm to patients, including the rejection of health insurance claims, thereby creating complex legal issues regarding the allocation of liability among hospitals, medical device vendors, and health insurance companies. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibilities of hospitals and medical device vendors for medical device failures that result in patient losses and the rejection of health insurance claims under the Indonesian health law framework. It also seeks to formulate an ideal legal framework for the allocation of responsibilities among the relevant parties to ensure fair legal protection for patients. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research, including legislation, legal literature, and scholarly journals, and were analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings indicate that hospitals bear legal responsibility under the doctrine of corporate liability to ensure the safety, quality, and proper management of medical devices used in healthcare services. Medical device vendors are liable under the principle of product liability for product defects, technical failures, and negligence in maintenance and after-sales services. Meanwhile, health insurance companies are obligated to process and settle claims in accordance with the principle of utmost good faith and may not reject claims arbitrarily without conducting an objective investigation into the cause of the loss. This study concludes that Indonesia requires a more comprehensive legal framework governing the allocation of responsibilities through an integrated investigation mechanism that promotes legal certainty, justice, accountability, and effective legal protection for patients as the most vulnerable parties in healthcare services.
Quo Vadis Integritas Profesi Advokat: Kerahasiaan Informasi Klien Versus Kepentingan Umum Hidayati Hidayati; Adji Annisa Rahmadina; Angga Perwira Sukmawinata; Dewi Indrayani; Afnas Rachmawati; Emma Choerunnisa
Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (Agustus - Oktober 2026)
Publisher : Greenation Publisher & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jgsp.v4i3.678

Abstract

Profesi advokat menempati posisi strategis dalam sistem peradilan sebagai salah satu unsur penegak hukum yang bertugas menjamin perlindungan hak konstitusional warga negara. Pelaksanaan fungsi tersebut memerlukan jaminan independensi profesi melalui pemberian hak imunitas serta kewajiban menjaga kerahasiaan informasi klien. Keberadaan hak imunitas bertujuan memberikan perlindungan terhadap advokat ketika menjalankan tugas profesi berdasarkan itikad baik. Perkembangan praktik penegakan hukum menunjukkan munculnya persoalan mengenai penyalahgunaan hak imunitas sebagai sarana melakukan perbuatan yang menghambat proses peradilan (obstruction of justice). Kondisi tersebut memunculkan konflik antara kewajiban menjaga kerahasiaan informasi klien dengan kepentingan umum dalam mewujudkan penegakan hukum yang efektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis batasan hak imunitas advokat dalam perspektif kepentingan umum serta mengkaji parameter yuridis yang membedakan tindakan pembelaan hukum yang sah dengan perbuatan obstruction of justice. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, serta pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hak imunitas advokat bukan merupakan hak absolut. Keberlakuannya bergantung pada terpenuhinya unsur itikad baik dalam pelaksanaan profesi. Tindakan advokat yang mengarah pada upaya merintangi penyidikan, penuntutan, maupun persidangan mengakibatkan gugurnya perlindungan imunitas profesi. Kepentingan umum memperoleh legitimasi konstitusional sebagai dasar pembatasan kerahasiaan informasi klien sepanjang dilakukan berdasarkan undang-undang guna menjaga integritas sistem peradilan pidana.
Co-Authors Adji Annisa Rahmadina Afnas Rachmawati Angga Perwira Sukmawinata Emma Choerunnisa Hidayati Hidayati Prassetyo Edi