Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Romi Sihombing
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Patologi Birokrasi dalam Tata Kelola Program Makan Bergizi Gratis: Kajian Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pejabat Badan Gizi Nasional Tahun 2025-2026 Muhamad Fikri; Muhamad Rizal Firdaus; Septian Saepulloh; Romi Sihombing
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September: Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i3.6630

Abstract

This study analyzes the alleged corruption involving the leadership of the National Nutrition Agency (BGN) in mid-2026 concerning the governance of the Free Nutritious Meal (MBG) program. Using a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical case study method, it examines the alleged modus operandi, institutional governance weaknesses, legal dynamics, and the socio-economic implications of the alleged misappropriation of state funds. Since its establishment in 2024, BGN’s budget grew substantially, from IDR 54.8 billion in 2024 to IDR 85.27 trillion in 2025 and IDR 268 trillion in 2026. This growth was not matched by an adequate internal control system which according to this study’s analysis, created room for bureaucratic pathology and rent-seeking. The Attorney General’s Office named three BGN leaders, Dadan Hindayana, Sony Sonjaya, and Lodewyk Pusung as suspects allegedly exploiting administrative discretion to influence the appointment of Nutrition Fulfillment Service Unit (SPPG) partners and to mark up the procurement of logistics, including 21,801 electric motorcycles. The case illustrates the relevance of agency theory to a newly formed bureaucracy led by figures without a mature public-management track record. The rejection of Sony Sonjaya’s justice-collaborator request and indications of involvement by political elites point to systemic roots. The study recommends institutional restructuring of BGN, integrated audit digitalization, and stronger public oversight of MBG. All accounts herein refer to the parties’ legal status as suspects and are subject to the presumption of innocence.
Analisis Pelanggaran Etika Hakim dalam Kasus Dugaan Penerimaan Suap dan Penyalahgunaan Harta Hasil Tindak Pidana Bobby Rahmat; Mochamad Rafli Basari; Teguh Firmansyah; Romi Sihombing
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September: Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i3.6641

Abstract

This study examines violations of judicial ethics in cases involving alleged bribery and the misuse of assets derived from criminal activities. Judicial integrity serves as a fundamental pillar in maintaining public trust in judicial institutions. Misconduct committed by law enforcement officials not only damages the image of the judiciary but also threatens the principles of the rule of law. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the acceptance of bribes by judges constitutes a violation of both the judicial code of ethics and criminal law, resulting in a decline in public confidence in the judicial system.
Co-Authors Bobby Rahmat Mochamad Rafli Basari Muhamad Fikri Muhamad Rizal Firdaus Septian Saepulloh Teguh Firmansyah