Articles
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Bidan Dalam Pemberian Pelayanan Umum Di Klinik Praktik Mandiri Bidan ]]>
<![CDATA[Hanifa Muslimah, Rifa’at]]>;
<![CDATA[Arrisman, Arrisman]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Syntax Fusion Vol 2 No 03 (2022): Jurnal Syntax Fusion: Jurnal Nasional Indonesia ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV RIFAINSTITUT ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.54543/fusion.v2i03.185
<![CDATA[Bidan sebagai tenaga kesehatan dalam menjalankan tugasnya memiliki hak-hak untuk memperoleh pelindungan hukum sepanjang melaksanakan tugas sesuai dengan kewenangannya. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum bagi bidan di Praktik Mandiri Bidan dalam pemberian pelayanan umum jika tidak ada fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan atau atas permintaan pasien dan untuk mengetahui kewenangan bidan di Praktik Mandiri Bidan dalam pemberian pelayanan umum. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan secara normatif empiris. Hasil: Perlindungan hukum bagi bidan dalam melakukan pelayanan kesehatan di Praktek Mandiri Bidan merupakan hak yang diberikan oleh hukum sepanjang bidan melakukan tugas sesuai dengan standar profesi, standar prosedur operasional dan kewenangannya sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 4 Tahun 2019 Tentang Kebidanan, Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan dan Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2017 Tentang Izin Dan Penyelenggaraan Praktik Bidan. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan bagi bidan yang medapatakan pelimpahan wewenang dari dokter di Rumah Sakit diatur dalam pasal 46 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 Tentang Rumah Sakit]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN PERBANDINGAN KEWAJIBAN HUKUM PERUSAHAAN ALIH DAYA/OUTSOURCING DENGAN PERUSAHAAN PENGGUNA JASA BERDASARKAN UNDANG - UNDANG CIPTA KERJA ]]>
<![CDATA[Syahputra, Arian]]>;
<![CDATA[Rumainur, Rumainur]]>;
<![CDATA[Arrisman, Arrisman]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Vol 4 No 2 (2024): EDISI 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Darma Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46930/jurnalrectum.v4i2.1883
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini meneliti tentang Tinjauan Perbandingan Kewajiban Hukum Perusahaan Alih Daya / Outsourcing dengan Perusahaan Pengguna Jasa Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk (1) mengetahui pengaturan hukum pelaku usaha perusahaan alih daya / outsourcing dengan pelaksanaan kewajiban hukum pelaku usaha perusahaan pekerja langsung berdasarkan Undang-Undang cipta kerja; (2) untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pelaksanaan kewajiban hukum pelaku usaha alih daya / outsourcing dengan pelaksanaan kewajiban hukum pelaku usaha pekerja langsung berdasarkan Undang-Undang cipta kerja; (3) untuk mengetahui bagaimana seharusnya pelaku usaha baik perusahaan alih daya / outsourcing maupun usaha perusahaan pekerja langsung dalam memberikan kewajiban hukum atas segala hal yang berkaitan dengan pekerja berdasarkan Undang-Undang cipta kerja. Kemudian teori dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teori keadilan, teori perlindungan hukum, teori kepastian hukum. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum yang bersifat Yuridis Normatif dengan pertimbangan dan analisis permasalahan hukum terkait Undang-Undang No.11 tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan Peraturan Pemerintah No.35 tahun 2021 tentang perjanjian waktu tertentu, alih daya, waktu kerja dan waktu istirahat, dan pemutusan hubungan kerja. Kemudian dalam penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. hasil dari penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa tidak adanya keadilan dan kesetaraan hak antara pekerja langsung perusahaan dan pekerja alih daya / outsourcing yang telah diatur oleh Undang-Undang No.11 tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan Peraturan Pemerintah No.35 tahun 2021.]]>
<![CDATA[Juridical Analysis of Tender Contract Law Enforcement According To Law Number 5 of 1999 Concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition ]]>
<![CDATA[Ariman, Renaldi]]>;
<![CDATA[Arrisman, Arrisman]]>;
<![CDATA[Gultom, Elisatris]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Dinasti Research ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1862
<![CDATA[This paper analyzes several instances of bid rigging based on two KPPU case decisions: No. 04/KPPU-L/2020 involving procurement collusion in hospital projects in Langsa, Aceh, and No. 14/KPPU-L/2019 related to irregularities in the procurement of drinking water systems at Bandar Lampung. The research employs a normative legal methodology with a prescriptive and practical orientation. It adopts legal and case-based approaches. Legal materials referenced include primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, collected through a literature-based method. The study concludes that the decision in Case No. 04/KPPU-L/2020 adheres to the provisions of Article No. 22 of Law No. 5 of 1999 and KPPU Regulation No. 2 of 2010, which serves as the guideline for implementing said article. Meanwhile, in Case No. 14/KPPU-L/2019, the existence of post-tender cooperation between the government and private parties, which ignored previously agreed tender terms, constitutes a violation of Article 79 of Government Regulation No. 54 of 2010 concerning the evaluation of bids in public procurement.]]>
<![CDATA[Kedudukan dan Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Separatis Terhadap Harta Debitor Pailit Berdasarkan Pasal 55 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang ]]>
<![CDATA[Fadhli, Muhammad]]>;
<![CDATA[Arrisman, Arrisman]]>;
<![CDATA[Rumainur, Rumainur]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Mei - Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Dinasti Review Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2008
<![CDATA[Separatist creditors are among the parties with interests in the assets of a bankrupt debtor. Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy and Debt Payment Delay Law specifically grants separatist creditors the right to execute assets that serve as collateral as if bankruptcy had not occurred. This article also places separatist creditors in a higher position compared to other creditors.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS DIREKSI PERSEROAN TERBATAS YANG TIDAK MENYELENGGARAKAN RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM TAHUNAN BERDASARKAN PASAL 79 AYAT (1) UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PERSEROAN TERBATAS ]]>
<![CDATA[Yasin , Yasin]]>;
<![CDATA[Arrisman, Arrisman]]>
<![CDATA[ JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): FEBRUARI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[INTELIGENSIA MEDIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This research aims to conduct a juridical analysis of the Directors of Limited Liability Companies (PT) which do not hold Annual General Meetings of Shareholders (AGMS) in accordance with the provisions of Article 79 Paragraph (1) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. This research uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the analysis show that failure to hold an AGMS by PT Directors can have serious legal consequences, including potential legal violations and negative impacts on the interests of shareholders. The existence of the AGMS as a shareholder control mechanism is strictly regulated in law to ensure transparency, accountability and shareholder participation in company strategic decision making. In this context, this research also identifies factors that cause the PT Board of Directors to not hold an AGMS, such as a lack of understanding of legal regulations, unsupportive internal policies, or even negligence of related parties. Therefore, efforts are needed to improve and strengthen regulations and legal awareness among business actors so that the implementation of the AGMS can be carried out effectively in accordance with the spirit of the law. In conclusion, the failure to hold an AGMS by PT Directors is a serious problem that requires legal attention and system improvements. This research contributes to understanding the impact of law and its causal factors, and emphasizes the importance of compliance with legal regulations to maintain company integrity and sustainability.]]>
<![CDATA[The Existence of Tax Courts in Indonesia From the Colonial Era, Independence, to Reformation ]]>
<![CDATA[Hanifa, Dien]]>;
<![CDATA[Arrisman, Arrisman]]>;
<![CDATA[Haryanto , Imam]]>
<![CDATA[ Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 7 (2024): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pelopor Publikasi Akademika ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v2i7.279
<![CDATA[The source of the State Budget is Taxes. Tax is a mandatory contribution that is coercive because it is regulated by law. One of the tax collection systems is self-assessment, where taxpayers are given the freedom to pay and report their taxes independently, the fiscal officer supervises and checks the tax returns reported by taxpayers every year. This difference in opinion on the results of the examination between taxpayers and tax officers is what raises the problem of tax disputes. The problem of tax disputes has existed from the Dutch colonial era to the present. The Tax Court is the body that decides tax dispute cases, the name and duties of the tax court have changed from time to time and with the decision number 26/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the Tax Court. The authority of the tax court changed to the full authority of the Supreme Court. This article concludes that the Tax Court developed over time, and along with tax reform the Tax Court also underwent reform with the transfer of organizational, administrative, and financial coaching authority to the Supreme Court (MA). With this transfer of authority, it is hoped that the Tax Court can decide tax dispute cases fairly and have legal certainty for the parties to the dispute.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Yuridis Pembuktian Sengketa Transfer Pricing ]]>
<![CDATA[Arrisman, Arrisman]]>;
<![CDATA[Fauzi, Ahmad]]>
<![CDATA[ Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Syntax Corporation ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i2.56912
<![CDATA[This research is about the juridical analysis of the proof of transfer pricing disputes with an example of the case of the Tax Court decision No.Put.74576/PP/M.IB/15/2016. The ruling granted an appeal filed by PT HI, a foreign investment company from Japan. Transfer Pricing or TP occurs in transactions involving "Taxpayers with parties who have a special relationship" (affiliates) based on Article 18 of the Income Tax Law. Taxpayers with affiliated transactions are required to fill in the information and method of testing TP on the Corporate Income Tax Return based on TP documentation. In the case of PT HI, the Director General of Taxes checks import purchase transactions from affiliates using the method listed in the Corporate Income Tax Return of PT HI. PT HI fills in the information of affiliate transactions in the Corporate Income Tax Return not based on TP documentation. PT HI makes TP documentation, and submits it to the tax office during the objection process. At the objection stage, the DGT rejected the objection submitted by PT HI. PT HI then appealed to the Tax Court. In its decision, the Tax Court granted the appeal and canceled the DGT's correction to the import purchase cost. This study aims to find out and analyze the efforts of the Panel of Judges at the Tax Court to obtain material truth in making decisions by referring to the theory of free proof. This study uses a normative juridical research method because it focuses on literature research which essentially examines legal principles, legal systematics, and legal synchronization by analyzing them. The results of the study show that the Tax Court with the principle of free proof obtains material truth by digging up legal facts from affiliate transactions.]]>
<![CDATA[Perjanjian Penyelesaian Sengketa pada Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Survei Status Gizi Indonesia Tahun 2024 (Studi Kontrak antara Kemenkes dan PT. Sucofindo) ]]>
<![CDATA[Arifin, Mohammad Syamsul]]>;
<![CDATA[Arrisman, Arrisman]]>
<![CDATA[ Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal (In-Press) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.54373/imeij.v7i2.5179
<![CDATA[Government procurement contracts for goods and services are public legal instruments that are prepared to ensure legal certainty, accountability, and financial protection of the state. In its implementation, contracts often undergo changes due to the technical and operational dynamics outlined in the contract addendum. The implementation of the 2024 Indonesian Nutrition Status Survey (SSGI) has experienced various technical and operational obstacles that require contract adjustments through several addendums, including the addition of honorariums for the Regency/City Technical Person in Charge (PJT). The problem arose when the Financial Audit Agency found an overpayment and recommended a return to the state treasury, thus giving rise to a difference in legal interpretation regarding the validity of the addendum. This study uses normative legal research methods with a statutory and conceptual approach, supported by empirical data as a complement to the analysis. The results of the study show that contract addendum can legally be used as an instrument for amending agreements and alternative non-litigation dispute resolution, but in the context of government procurement, its applicability is limited by the principles of legality, accountability, and compliance with state financial management. Addendum that does not meet an adequate legal and administrative basis cannot be used as a valid basis for payment.]]>
<![CDATA[KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM: STUDI KASUS PERKARA NOMOR 726/Pdt.G/2024/PA.JS. ]]>
<![CDATA[Yona, Rika Delfa]]>;
<![CDATA[Arrisman, Arrisman]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 10 (2026): Maret 2026 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Bajang Institute ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini mengkaji kewenangan Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa perbuatan melawan hukum di bidang ekonomi syariah melalui studi kasus Perkara Nomor 726/Pdt.G/2024/PA.JS jo. Putusan Nomor 157/Pdt.G/2024/PTA.JK jo. Putusan Nomor 244 K/Ag/2025. Permasalahan penelitian berangkat dari adanya ketidaksinkronan antara pengaturan normatif kewenangan Pengadilan Agama dan praktik peradilan yang menunjukkan perbedaan pertimbangan hakim antar tingkat peradilan dalam menentukan kewenangan absolut. Dengan rumusan masalah: 1). Bagaimana konstruksi yuridis pertimbangan hakim dalam menentukan kewenangan Pengadilan Agama untuk mengadili sengketa perbuatan melawan hukum di bidang ekonomi syariah dalam perkara Nomor 726/Pdt.G/2024/PA.JS jo. Putusan Nomor 157/Pdt.G/2024/PTA.JK jo. Putusan Nomor 244 K/Ag/2025?; 2). Bagaimana implikasi perbedaan pertimbangan hakim antar tingkat peradilan tersebut terhadap kepastian hukum kewenangan Pengadilan Agama dalam penyelesaian sengketa perbuatan melawan hukum di bidang ekonomi syariah? Dan dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, didapatkan kesimpulan perbedaan pertimbangan hakim antar tingkat peradilan berakar pada perbedaan pendekatan dalam menafsirkan kewenangan absolut, yaitu antara pendekatan formal berdasarkan nomenklatur gugatan dan pendekatan substantif berdasarkan karakter hubungan hukum para pihak. Mahkamah Agung dalam putusan kasasi menegaskan bahwa penentuan kewenangan harus didasarkan pada substansi hubungan hukum ekonomi syariah, bukan semata-mata pada bentuk gugatan. Perbedaan pertimbangan tersebut berdampak pada ketidakpastian hukum forum penyelesaian sengketa dan berpotensi menimbulkan proses peradilan yang berlarut-larut. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan konstruksi kewenangan yang konsisten dan berbasis substansi untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dalam penyelesaian sengketa perbuatan melawan hukum di bidang ekonomi syariah]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN ITIKAD BAIK DALAM SENGKETA AKAD MUDHARABAH YANG MEMUAT FIXED-RATE (ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 221/PDT.G/2024/PA.JS DAN NOMOR 151/PDT.G/2024/PTA.JK) ]]>
<![CDATA[Marilan, Lian]]>;
<![CDATA[Arrisman, Arrisman]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 10 (2026): Maret 2026 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Bajang Institute ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Perkembangan investasi non-bank di Indonesia kerap menggunakan akad mudharabah untuk memberikan legitimasi syariah, namun dalam praktiknya sering mengalami pergeseran menjadi skema berimbal hasil tetap yang berpotensi menimbulkan persoalan kepastian dan keabsahan hukum. Dengan rumusan masalah: 1). Bagaimana penerapan prinsip kepastian hukum dan asas itikad baik oleh hakim dalam menyelesaikan sengketa akad mudharabah yang memuat klausul fixed-rate pada Putusan Nomor 221/Pdt.G/2024/PA.JS dan Putusan Nomor 151/Pdt.G/2024/PTA.JK?; 2). Bagaimana kedudukan hukum klausul fixed-rate dalam akad mudharabah menurut pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan berjenjang Pengadilan Agama dan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama?. Dan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, didapatkan hasil bahwa sengketa mudharabah dengan klausul fixed-rate tidak dapat direduksi sebagai wanprestasi kontraktual biasa, karena mengandung ketegangan antara kepastian hukum berbasis kesepakatan para pihak dan karakter dasar mudharabah sebagai akad bagi hasil dan pembagian risiko. Penerapan kepastian hukum oleh hakim cenderung menekankan akibat hukum bagi para pihak, namun belum merumuskan parameter yang konsisten dalam menilai klausul fixed-rate. Asas itikad baik telah dipertimbangkan, tetapi belum secara sistematis digunakan untuk menguji kepatutan substansi klausul tersebut. Secara konseptual, klausul fixed-rate berpotensi menggeser substansi mudharabah menjadi hubungan utang-piutang. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa kepastian hukum dan itikad baik harus diintegrasikan untuk menjaga konsistensi normatif sekaligus memastikan keadilan substantif dalam praktik hukum ekonomi syariah.]]>
