Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.235
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Jurnal Syntax Fusion : Jurnal Nasional Indonesia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Journal of Law and Nation Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Arrisman, Arrisman
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Bidan Dalam Pemberian Pelayanan Umum Di Klinik Praktik Mandiri Bidan Hanifa Muslimah, Rifa’at; Arrisman, Arrisman
Jurnal Syntax Fusion Vol 2 No 03 (2022): Jurnal Syntax Fusion: Jurnal Nasional Indonesia
Publisher : CV RIFAINSTITUT

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54543/fusion.v2i03.185

Abstract

Bidan sebagai tenaga kesehatan dalam menjalankan tugasnya memiliki hak-hak untuk memperoleh pelindungan hukum sepanjang melaksanakan tugas sesuai dengan kewenangannya. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum bagi bidan di Praktik Mandiri Bidan dalam pemberian pelayanan umum jika tidak ada fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan atau atas permintaan pasien dan untuk mengetahui kewenangan bidan di Praktik Mandiri Bidan dalam pemberian pelayanan umum. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan secara normatif empiris. Hasil: Perlindungan hukum bagi bidan dalam melakukan pelayanan kesehatan di Praktek Mandiri Bidan merupakan hak yang diberikan oleh hukum sepanjang bidan melakukan tugas sesuai dengan standar profesi, standar prosedur operasional dan kewenangannya sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 4 Tahun 2019 Tentang Kebidanan, Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan dan Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2017 Tentang Izin Dan Penyelenggaraan Praktik Bidan. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan bagi bidan yang medapatakan pelimpahan wewenang dari dokter di Rumah Sakit diatur dalam pasal 46 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 Tentang Rumah Sakit
TINJAUAN PERBANDINGAN KEWAJIBAN HUKUM PERUSAHAAN ALIH DAYA/OUTSOURCING DENGAN PERUSAHAAN PENGGUNA JASA BERDASARKAN UNDANG - UNDANG CIPTA KERJA Syahputra, Arian; Rumainur, Rumainur; Arrisman, Arrisman
JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Vol 4 No 2 (2024): EDISI 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Darma Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46930/jurnalrectum.v4i2.1883

Abstract

Penelitian ini meneliti tentang Tinjauan Perbandingan Kewajiban Hukum Perusahaan Alih Daya / Outsourcing dengan Perusahaan Pengguna Jasa Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk (1) mengetahui pengaturan hukum pelaku usaha perusahaan alih daya / outsourcing dengan pelaksanaan kewajiban hukum pelaku usaha perusahaan pekerja langsung berdasarkan Undang-Undang cipta kerja; (2) untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pelaksanaan kewajiban hukum pelaku usaha alih daya / outsourcing dengan pelaksanaan kewajiban hukum pelaku usaha pekerja langsung berdasarkan Undang-Undang cipta kerja; (3) untuk mengetahui bagaimana seharusnya pelaku usaha baik perusahaan alih daya / outsourcing maupun usaha perusahaan pekerja langsung dalam memberikan kewajiban hukum atas segala hal yang berkaitan dengan pekerja berdasarkan Undang-Undang cipta kerja. Kemudian teori dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teori keadilan, teori perlindungan hukum, teori kepastian hukum. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum yang bersifat Yuridis Normatif dengan pertimbangan dan analisis permasalahan hukum terkait Undang-Undang No.11 tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan Peraturan Pemerintah No.35 tahun 2021 tentang perjanjian waktu tertentu, alih daya, waktu kerja dan waktu istirahat, dan pemutusan hubungan kerja. Kemudian dalam penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. hasil dari penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa tidak adanya keadilan dan kesetaraan hak antara pekerja langsung perusahaan dan pekerja alih daya / outsourcing yang telah diatur oleh Undang-Undang No.11 tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan Peraturan Pemerintah No.35 tahun 2021.
Juridical Analysis of Tender Contract Law Enforcement According To Law Number 5 of 1999 Concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition Ariman, Renaldi; Arrisman, Arrisman; Gultom, Elisatris
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1862

Abstract

This paper analyzes several instances of bid rigging based on two KPPU case decisions: No. 04/KPPU-L/2020 involving procurement collusion in hospital projects in Langsa, Aceh, and No. 14/KPPU-L/2019 related to irregularities in the procurement of drinking water systems at Bandar Lampung. The research employs a normative legal methodology with a prescriptive and practical orientation. It adopts legal and case-based approaches. Legal materials referenced include primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, collected through a literature-based method. The study concludes that the decision in Case No. 04/KPPU-L/2020 adheres to the provisions of Article No. 22 of Law No. 5 of 1999 and KPPU Regulation No. 2 of 2010, which serves as the guideline for implementing said article. Meanwhile, in Case No. 14/KPPU-L/2019, the existence of post-tender cooperation between the government and private parties, which ignored previously agreed tender terms, constitutes a violation of Article 79 of Government Regulation No. 54 of 2010 concerning the evaluation of bids in public procurement.
Kedudukan dan Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Separatis Terhadap Harta Debitor Pailit Berdasarkan Pasal 55 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Fadhli, Muhammad; Arrisman, Arrisman; Rumainur, Rumainur
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Mei - Juni 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2008

Abstract

Separatist creditors are among the parties with interests in the assets of a bankrupt debtor. Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy and Debt Payment Delay Law specifically grants separatist creditors the right to execute assets that serve as collateral as if bankruptcy had not occurred. This article also places separatist creditors in a higher position compared to other creditors.
ANALISIS YURIDIS DIREKSI PERSEROAN TERBATAS YANG TIDAK MENYELENGGARAKAN RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM TAHUNAN BERDASARKAN PASAL 79 AYAT (1) UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PERSEROAN TERBATAS Yasin , Yasin; Arrisman, Arrisman
JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): FEBRUARI
Publisher : INTELIGENSIA MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to conduct a juridical analysis of the Directors of Limited Liability Companies (PT) which do not hold Annual General Meetings of Shareholders (AGMS) in accordance with the provisions of Article 79 Paragraph (1) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. This research uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the analysis show that failure to hold an AGMS by PT Directors can have serious legal consequences, including potential legal violations and negative impacts on the interests of shareholders. The existence of the AGMS as a shareholder control mechanism is strictly regulated in law to ensure transparency, accountability and shareholder participation in company strategic decision making. In this context, this research also identifies factors that cause the PT Board of Directors to not hold an AGMS, such as a lack of understanding of legal regulations, unsupportive internal policies, or even negligence of related parties. Therefore, efforts are needed to improve and strengthen regulations and legal awareness among business actors so that the implementation of the AGMS can be carried out effectively in accordance with the spirit of the law. In conclusion, the failure to hold an AGMS by PT Directors is a serious problem that requires legal attention and system improvements. This research contributes to understanding the impact of law and its causal factors, and emphasizes the importance of compliance with legal regulations to maintain company integrity and sustainability.
The Existence of Tax Courts in Indonesia From the Colonial Era, Independence, to Reformation Hanifa, Dien; Arrisman, Arrisman; Haryanto , Imam
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 7 (2024): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v2i7.279

Abstract

The source of the State Budget is Taxes. Tax is a mandatory contribution that is coercive because it is regulated by law. One of the tax collection systems is self-assessment, where taxpayers are given the freedom to pay and report their taxes independently, the fiscal officer supervises and checks the tax returns reported by taxpayers every year. This difference in opinion on the results of the examination between taxpayers and tax officers is what raises the problem of tax disputes. The problem of tax disputes has existed from the Dutch colonial era to the present. The Tax Court is the body that decides tax dispute cases, the name and duties of the tax court have changed from time to time and with the decision number 26/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the Tax Court. The authority of the tax court changed to the full authority of the Supreme Court. This article concludes that the Tax Court developed over time, and along with tax reform the Tax Court also underwent reform with the transfer of organizational, administrative, and financial coaching authority to the Supreme Court (MA). With this transfer of authority, it is hoped that the Tax Court can decide tax dispute cases fairly and have legal certainty for the parties to the dispute.
Analisis Yuridis Pembuktian Sengketa Transfer Pricing Arrisman, Arrisman; Fauzi, Ahmad
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i2.56912

Abstract

This research is about the juridical analysis of the proof of transfer pricing disputes with an example of the case of the Tax Court decision No.Put.74576/PP/M.IB/15/2016. The ruling granted an appeal filed by PT HI, a foreign investment company from Japan. Transfer Pricing or TP occurs in transactions involving "Taxpayers with parties who have a special relationship" (affiliates) based on Article 18 of the Income Tax Law. Taxpayers with affiliated transactions are required to fill in the information and method of testing TP on the Corporate Income Tax Return based on TP documentation. In the case of PT HI, the Director General of Taxes checks import purchase transactions from affiliates using the method listed in the Corporate Income Tax Return of PT HI. PT HI fills in the information of affiliate transactions in the Corporate Income Tax Return not based on TP documentation. PT HI makes TP documentation, and submits it to the tax office during the objection process. At the objection stage, the DGT rejected the objection submitted by PT HI. PT HI then appealed to the Tax Court. In its decision, the Tax Court granted the appeal and canceled the DGT's correction to the import purchase cost. This study aims to find out and analyze the efforts of the Panel of Judges at the Tax Court to obtain material truth in making decisions by referring to the theory of free proof. This study uses a normative juridical research method because it focuses on literature research which essentially examines legal principles, legal systematics, and legal synchronization by analyzing them. The results of the study show that the Tax Court with the principle of free proof obtains material truth by digging up legal facts from affiliate transactions.
Co-Authors Ariman, Renaldi Elisatris Gultom Fauzi Ahmad Muda Hanifa Muslimah, Rifa’at Hanifa, Dien Haryanto , Imam Muhammad Fadhli Rumainur, Rumainur Syahputra, Arian Yasin , Yasin