Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGARUH PROGRAM DESA MANDIRI PANGAN DALAM MENINGKATKAN PENDAPATAN USAHATANI Febriansyah, Ebi; Nurchaini, Dewi Sri; Fathoni, Zakky
Jurnal Ilmiah Sosio-Ekonomika Bisnis Vol 21 No 1 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Sosio-Ekonomika Bisnis
Publisher : Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (118.549 KB) | DOI: 10.22437/jiseb.v21i1.5093

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan (i) untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan program Desa Mandiri Pangan di lokasi penelitian (ii) peranan program Desa Mandiri Pangan dalam peningkatan pendapatan usahatani dilokasi penelitian. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data primer dan data sekunder. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif melalui tabel distribusi frekuensi. Uji analisis yang digunakan adalah uji statistik parametrik dengan metode uji t beda dua rata-rata. Berdasarkan hasil di lapangan bahwa kegiatan pelaksanaan program Desa Mandiri Pangan di lokasi penelitian telah sesuai dengan anjuran dari Badan Ketahanan Pangan Provinsi Jambi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata pendapatan petani program sebesar Rp Rp. 6.032.544,-/ha /tahun dan rata-rata pendapatan petani non program sebesar Rp Rp. 4.499.884,-/ha/tahun. Terdapat perbedaan pendapatan antara petani program dan petani non program Desa Mandiri Pangan yaitu besar rata-rata pendapatan yang diterima petani program lebih besar dibandingkan rata – rata pendapatan petani non program Desa Mandiri Pangan di lokasi penelitian. Hasil pengujian dengan uji beda dua rata-rata diperoleh bahwa tingkat perbedaan pendapatan antara petani yang mengikuti program Desa Mandiri Pangan dan pendapatan petani yang tidak mengikuti program Desa Mandiri Pangan sebesar 5,193 t-hitung > dari t-tabel 1,662 pada taraf kepercayaan 95 %. Kata kunci : Program Desa Mandiri Pangan, Pendapatan Usahatani, Perbedaan Pendapatan
ANALISIS EFISIENSI TEKNIS, INEFISIENSI TEKNIS DAN RISIKO PRODUKSI USAHATANI PADI SAWAH DI KABUPATEN TANJUNG JABUNG BARAT (DENGAN PENDEKATAN MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION) Febriansyah, Ebi; Murdy, Saad; Nainggolan, Saidin
JALOW | Journal of Agribusiness and Local Wisdom Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal Agribusiness and Local Wisdom
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis bekerja sama dengan PERHEPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/jalow.v4i1.13324

Abstract

This study aims to determine (1) Analyze the production picture of the use of lowland rice farming input in Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency, (2) Analyze the use of production function inputs and productivity on the risk of production of lowland rice farming in Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency, (3) Analyze the risk relationship production with technical efficiency of lowland rice farming in Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency, (4) analyzing the factors that influence the technical inefficiency of lowland rice farming in West Tanajung Regency. The study was conducted in Batang Asam District and Renah Mendalo District with a sample of 120 respondents. Technical efficiency analysis is carried out with the Stochastic Frontier production function. Risk analysis is performed by calculating the value of the coefficient of variation, the factors that affect risk in the analysis with the Cobb-Douglas production function with the Just and Pope method, the analysis of the relationship of production risk with technical efficiency using the Chi-Square method, while the factors affecting the occurrence of efficiency technical and technical inefficiencies used the Productivity Function model. The results showed that (1) Factors of seed production, urea , SP36, KCl, organic, medicine, labor and land area were factors of production that could significantly increase paddy rice production. (2) Production factors, seeds, organic fertilizer, and labor and land area are production factors that can reduce variations in paddy production, so that these factors are factors that can reduce production risk (risk reducing factors), (3) Efficiency Value the technical use of production factors of 66% is technically inefficient (ET = 0.66 <0.70). This means that opportunities for increasing productivity are still available by 34%. (4) Socioeconomic factors that are negative about inefficiency are experience, activity in farmer groups, variable land distance from farmer houses and number of family members.