Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Climate Justice Review Indonesian Court and Justice Review
Fadhel Arjuna Adinda
Universitas Islam Riau

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Women and Climate Change: A Gender-Based Analysis of Rural Climate Resilience Aprila Niravita; Fadhel Arjuna Adinda; Winda Rahma Santosa
Indonesian Climate Justice Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): January, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/xby76g33

Abstract

This paper presents a gender-based analysis of climate resilience in rural communities, focusing on the often-overlooked role of women in adapting to and mitigating the impacts of climate change. Drawing on field research from rural regions in Indonesia and complemented by a review of global gender-climate frameworks, the study examines how women’s experiences, responsibilities, and knowledge systems shape their responses to environmental challenges. It argues that while rural women are disproportionately affected by climate-related stresses—such as water scarcity, agricultural decline, and natural disasters—they also possess unique adaptive capacities rooted in local knowledge, caregiving roles, and community networks. Through qualitative interviews, participatory observation, and policy analysis, the research identifies key structural barriers that limit women's access to resources, decision-making processes, and climate adaptation programs. These include gendered land tenure systems, limited financial and technical support, and socio-cultural norms that undervalue women’s labor and leadership. At the same time, the paper documents instances where women have emerged as pivotal actors in grassroots climate initiatives, sustainable agriculture, and disaster risk management. The paper’s primary contribution is its call for the integration of gender justice into climate resilience planning at both national and community levels. It challenges technocratic, gender-neutral adaptation models and highlights the importance of intersectional approaches that consider class, ethnicity, and local context. By centering women's voices and agency, the study advocates for inclusive climate strategies that recognize women not merely as vulnerable populations, but as key agents of transformative change in the face of the climate crisis.
The Dualism of Court Institutions: Challenges in Harmonizing the National Legal System Fadhel Arjuna Adinda
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): February, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/kccp3m30

Abstract

Indonesia’s judiciary is characterized by institutional dualism, with multiple court jurisdictions—general, religious, military, administrative—operating under a decentralized and often fragmented legal framework. This structural dualism presents ongoing challenges in achieving coherence, consistency, and legal unity. This study explores the implications of such institutional fragmentation for legal harmonization and judicial efficiency. Through a doctrinal and comparative legal analysis, combined with field interviews and policy reviews, the research investigates areas where overlapping jurisdiction, conflicting procedural norms, and divergent judicial training contribute to inconsistency in legal interpretation and public confusion. The findings show that, although the integration of judicial administration under the Supreme Court was a step toward unification, substantive harmonization remains elusive. This has led to jurisdictional conflicts, especially in areas such as family law, land disputes, and administrative oversight. The novelty of the study lies in its critical appraisal of judicial dualism from both structural and functional perspectives. It argues that harmonization efforts must go beyond administrative integration and address deeper issues of legal culture, normative hierarchy, and cross-jurisdictional jurisprudence. This research offers recommendations for improving coordination across courts, standardizing procedural rules, and fostering a more unified national legal identity. As Indonesia continues to develop its legal infrastructure, addressing judicial dualism is vital to enhancing legal certainty and access to justice.
Selective Equality Before the Law? Sentencing Disparities and Court Justice in Indonesian Corruption Cases Ridwan Arifin; Ikram Nur Fuady; Fadhel Arjuna Adinda; Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/r9r5q977

Abstract

Equality before the law constitutes a core principle of court justice, yet sentencing disparities continue to provoke public debate in Indonesia’s corruption cases. This paper examines how sentencing practices reflect and challenge the normative commitment to equality in criminal adjudication. Through doctrinal analysis of criminal law principles and comparative reading of selected corruption verdicts, the study explores variations in sentencing severity across cases with comparable legal and factual circumstances. The analysis suggests that judicial discretion, while legally permitted, often lacks sufficiently articulated justification, creating perceptions of unequal treatment. By focusing on sentencing as a site of justice evaluation, the paper highlights how court justice is shaped by consistency, proportionality, and transparency. It raises normative questions about the limits of judicial discretion and the role of sentencing guidelines in reinforcing public confidence in the criminal justice system.
Co-Authors Aprila Niravita Ikram Nur Fuady Ridwan Arifin Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah Winda Rahma Santosa