Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Indonesian Court and Justice Review Indonesian Minority Justice Review Lentera Masyarakat Hukum Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy
Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Role of Justice Collaborators in Uncovering Terrorist Networks: Effectiveness Analysis in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System: Peran Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) dalam Mengungkap Jaringan Terorisme: Analisis Efektivitas dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Muhammad Faiq Zuhrul Anam; Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.25935

Abstract

Terrorism is a type of organized crime that falls into the category of extraordinary crime. Overcoming this also requires the use of extraordinary measures. Justice collaborator (JC) is a scheme that can optimize the process of handling criminal acts of terrorism, which not only includes repressive efforts (penal path) but prevents similar crimes from occurring early by revealing a wider terrorist network. This study analyzes the role of justice collaborators (JC) in revealing terrorist networks and the effectiveness of their application in the criminal justice system. This study is a type of juridical-normative research using a statute approach. The role of justice collaborators (JC) in revealing terrorist networks has been regulated in several rules that are separate from regulations on overcoming criminal acts of terrorism. The non-single legal basis gives rise to different interpretations, thus having implications for the ineffectiveness of the role of justice collaborators (JC) in revealing terrorist networks. This can be seen from the absence of a unified coordination of law enforcement officers to ensure the fulfillment of the rights of protection and appreciation for justice collaborators (JC). The implementation in the criminal justice system raises several obstacles, including the mechanism, multi-agency coordination, qualifications, and credibility of the perpetrators who are made justice collaborators (JC). This study concludes that there needs to be an update to regulating justice collaborators (JC) into a single law binding on all criminal justice institutions. There are two update mechanisms: creating a single law or including it in the Criminal Code Bill. Further research is expected to deepen the understanding of empirical data and the use of normative data.
Selective Equality Before the Law? Sentencing Disparities and Court Justice in Indonesian Corruption Cases Ridwan Arifin; Ikram Nur Fuady; Fadhel Arjuna Adinda; Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/r9r5q977

Abstract

Equality before the law constitutes a core principle of court justice, yet sentencing disparities continue to provoke public debate in Indonesia’s corruption cases. This paper examines how sentencing practices reflect and challenge the normative commitment to equality in criminal adjudication. Through doctrinal analysis of criminal law principles and comparative reading of selected corruption verdicts, the study explores variations in sentencing severity across cases with comparable legal and factual circumstances. The analysis suggests that judicial discretion, while legally permitted, often lacks sufficiently articulated justification, creating perceptions of unequal treatment. By focusing on sentencing as a site of justice evaluation, the paper highlights how court justice is shaped by consistency, proportionality, and transparency. It raises normative questions about the limits of judicial discretion and the role of sentencing guidelines in reinforcing public confidence in the criminal justice system.
Minorities and the Law: Discrimination and Justice in Indonesia’s Urban Areas Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah; Ridwan Arifin; Rena Yulia; Eko Nuriyatman
Indonesian Minority Justice Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): April, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/gnwe6327

Abstract

This paper examines the experiences of ethnic and religious minorities in urban areas of Indonesia, focusing on the legal structures that either facilitate or hinder their access to justice. Indonesia’s urban centers, such as Jakarta and Surabaya, are home to diverse populations, yet minorities in these areas often face discrimination in housing, employment, education, and public services. The study reviews the legal frameworks governing urban rights, including the 1945 Constitution, the Law on Ethnic Equality, and municipal regulations, and evaluates their effectiveness in addressing discrimination. Drawing on case studies, interviews with minority group leaders, and surveys of urban residents, the paper highlights the systemic barriers faced by minorities in accessing justice, particularly in relation to land disputes, religious freedoms, and employment discrimination. The findings suggest that while legal protections exist, they are often inadequately enforced or are subject to local political dynamics that favor the majority population. The paper concludes by recommending reforms aimed at improving legal access and ensuring more equitable treatment for minorities in urban areas, including stronger anti-discrimination laws, better enforcement of existing regulations, and the creation of specialized legal services for minority communities.
Bridging Access to Justice for Migrant Workers’ Families in Central Java: A Legal Empowerment Approach: Menjembatani Akses terhadap Keadilan bagi Keluarga Pekerja Migran di Jawa Tengah: Pendekatan Pemberdayaan Hukum Waspiah Waspiah; Dian Latifiani; Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah
Lentera Masyarakat Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/nrmt4h08

Abstract

Introduction:While migrant workers contribute significantly to local and national economies, their families often face unresolved legal issues, including labor disputes, debt, inheritance, and access to social protection. These families frequently lack legal knowledge and institutional access. Purposes:This study examines how legal empowerment strategies enhance access to justice for migrant workers’ families in Central Java. Method:The study uses a qualitative approach based on interviews with migrant workers’ families, community paralegals, NGO staff, and local officials, supported by program documentation. Findings and Results:Findings indicate that legal empowerment improved legal literacy and dispute-resolution capacity among families. Community-based paralegals effectively facilitated mediation, administrative advocacy, and referrals. However, gendered power relations and limited institutional responsiveness constrained outcomes. Urgency:Improving access to justice for migrant families is urgent to prevent social vulnerability and rights violations. Contribution:This research broadens the scope of migrant justice studies by focusing on family members left behind. Recommendation:The study recommends expanding legal empowerment programs and integrating them into local governance systems.
Gender-Based Violence and State Response: Assessing the Implementation of the TPKS Law Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah; Rasdi Rasdi
Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/2tphe030

Abstract

This paper evaluates the implementation of Indonesia’s 2022 Law on the Elimination of Sexual Violence (TPKS Law), which aims to address gender-based violence (GBV) and provide stronger legal protections for survivors. While the law marks a significant step toward gender justice, its effectiveness in practice remains debated. The study assesses the law’s provisions, such as the creation of special courts for sexual violence cases and the provision of victim protection mechanisms. By analyzing case studies, interviews with legal professionals, and survivors, the paper explores the challenges in implementation, including gaps in institutional capacity, cultural barriers, and a lack of public awareness. Furthermore, the research investigates how local governments, NGOs, and grassroots organizations are contributing to the law’s enforcement. The findings suggest that while the law’s enactment was a milestone, its success hinges on overcoming challenges such as victim-blaming, inconsistent legal interpretations, and limited support for survivors. The paper concludes by offering recommendations for strengthening the law’s implementation, such as improving training for law enforcement, increasing community outreach, and promoting comprehensive victim support services.
Co-Authors Dian Latifiani Eko Nuriyatman Fadhel Arjuna Adinda Ikram Nur Fuady Muhammad Faiq Zuhrul Anam Rasdi - Rena Yulia Ridwan Arifin Ridwan Arifin Waspiah -