<![CDATA[Background: Effective anesthesia management is essential to ensure patient safety, minimize perioperative complications, and promote optimal recovery. Comprehensive planning across the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases allows anesthesiologists to deliver systematic and high-quality care. Evaluating each component of anesthesia services context, input, process, product, and outcome is crucial for maintaining professional standards and improving patient satisfaction. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate anesthesia care arrangements (pre-, intra-, and postoperative) at the Central Surgical Installation of dr. Soepraoen Kesdam V/Brawijaya Malang Hospital using the CIPP evaluation model. Subjects and Method: This qualitative evaluative study was conducted from June 1 to July 1, 2024, employing the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) framework. Five anesthesiologists were selected through probability sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, direct observations, document reviews, and Focus Group Discussions, and analyzed through data reduction, classification, and interpretation. Results: Evaluation of the context and input components showed that anesthesia services complied with professional standards and ASKAN guidelines, supported by adequate human resources, infrastructure, and standard operating procedures. The process component including assessment, diagnosis, intervention, implementation, evaluation, and documentation was implemented adequately but not fully aligned with the ASKAN guidelines. Product evaluation indicated satisfactory documentation quality with partial conformity to the 2023 ASKAN edition. The outcome showed stable patient hemodynamics and high satisfaction levels. Conclusion: Context and input components were well-implemented, while process and product evaluations were adequate but require improved documentation to align with the latest ASKAN standards.]]>
