M Arif Musthofa
Institut Islam Al Mujaddid Sabak

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Constructing Fair Compensation for Pesantren Educators: An Ijarah Perspective Dian Rahmat; M Arif Musthofa; Reza Okva Marwendi; Wargo; Achmad Hidayat; Daud
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 4 Oktober 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i4.1567

Abstract

Compensation for educators in Islamic boarding schools (pesantren) often presents a tension between spiritual devotion (khidmah) and professional economic rights. This study investigates the practice of teacher remuneration at Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasanah from the perspective of the ijarah 'ala al-'amal (lease of services) contract. Using a qualitative empirical approach with a case study design, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, observations, and document analysis of financial records. The findings reveal a significant gap between formal contractual compliance and operational reality. Although the initial agreement meets the essential legal conditions (rukun) of ijarah, the practice is compromised by unilateral wage reductions, recurrent payment delays, and a lack of financial transparency regarding institutional budget deficits. This study highlights the phenomenon of ikrah ma’nawi (psychological and structural coercion), wherein educators’ passive acceptance of wage cuts does not signify genuine mutual consent (an-taradhin), but rather a defect of consent driven by economic vulnerability and religious devotion narratives. From a Maqasid al-Shariah perspective, this institutional risk-shifting violates the protection of wealth (hifz al-mal) and well-being (hifz al-nafs). Constructing a fair compensation model requires institutionalizing financial transparency, separating spiritual altruism from commercial contractual obligations, and adopting equitable wage benchmarks (ajr al-mitsl).
Workload Changes in Ijārah Contracts: Contractual Justice and Worker Rights in Islamic Law Nurfauziah Azahra; M Arif Musthofa; Reza Okva Marwendi; Wargo; Hasna Dewi; Ribut Swarsono
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 4 Oktober 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i4.1571

Abstract

This study examines changes in workload within an ijārah al-a‘māl employment relationship and analyzes their implications for contractual justice and worker rights from the perspective of Islamic law. The study addresses the problem of additional duties assigned to workers beyond the scope of an initial oral employment agreement without corresponding renegotiation or adjustment of ujrah. Employing a qualitative empirical legal research design with a descriptive-analytical approach, data were collected through non-participant observation, semi-structured interviews with one employer, one active worker, and one former worker, as well as examination of relevant documents. Data were analyzed through coding, categorization, interpretation, and normative comparison with the principles of ijārah al-a‘māl, tarāḍin (mutual consent), contractual clarity, ‘adl (justice), and proportionality of remuneration. The findings demonstrate that the initial employment agreement primarily covered store-related activities, including serving customers, arranging merchandise, and supervising the store. In practice, workers were subsequently assigned additional domestic and personal duties, such as cleaning the employer’s house, washing clothes, cleaning storage areas, and caring for the employer’s child. These additional responsibilities were imposed without explicit renegotiation and without an adjustment of the agreed remuneration. The study further finds that workers’ acceptance of the additional duties was influenced by economic dependence and concerns about losing employment, raising questions regarding the substantive nature of mutual consent. From the perspective of Islamic law, substantial changes in workload should be accompanied by renewed agreement and proportionate compensation. The study concludes that expanding work responsibilities without contractual renegotiation and corresponding adjustment of ujrah does not fully reflect the principles of contractual clarity, tarāḍin, proportionality, and justice in ijārah al-a‘māl. The findings underscore the importance of transparent employment agreements as a mechanism for protecting worker rights in informal economic activities