Murniadi Murniadi
Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Employee Value Proposition and Turnover Intention among Employees in Indonesia Murniadi Murniadi; Asa Sheila Amelia; Latifah Latifah
The Eastasouth Management and Business Vol. 5 No. 01 (2026): The Eastasouth Management and Business (ESMB)
Publisher : Eastasouth Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/esmb.v5i01.1231

Abstract

Employee retention remains a critical concern for organizations as employees increasingly evaluate employment opportunities based not only on compensation, but also on broader workplace value and leadership quality. This study examines the effects of Employee Value Proposition (EVP) and leadership on employees’ intent to change jobs in Indonesia. A quantitative research design was employed using data collected from 185 employees through a structured questionnaire measured on a five-point Likert scale. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 through descriptive statistics, validity and reliability testing, classical assumption tests, Pearson correlation, multiple linear regression, t-tests, F-tests, and the coefficient of determination. The results indicate that Employee Value Proposition has a negative and significant effect on intent to change jobs. Leadership also has a negative and significant effect on intent to change jobs. Simultaneously, Employee Value Proposition and leadership significantly explain employees’ job-change intentions. The model explains 52.0% of the variance in intent to change jobs, with an Adjusted R² of 0.515. Leadership demonstrates a relatively stronger contribution than Employee Value Proposition in explaining employees’ job-change intentions. These findings support Social Exchange Theory by demonstrating that employees’ decisions to remain with or leave an organization are influenced by both the value received from the employment relationship and the quality of their leadership experience. The study highlights the importance of strengthening Employee Value Proposition and leadership practices as complementary strategies for reducing employee turnover intentions and improving workforce retention in Indonesia.
Counterproductive Work Behavior and Employee Performance in the Organizational Context in Indonesia Neneng Milasari; Rahmawati Rahmawati; Safier Ramdani; Murniadi Murniadi; Taswati Nova Wijayaningrum
The Eastasouth Management and Business Vol. 5 No. 01 (2026): The Eastasouth Management and Business (ESMB)
Publisher : Eastasouth Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/esmb.v5i01.1234

Abstract

Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB) has become an important issue in organizational management because it can negatively affect employee effectiveness, workplace relationships, and organizational performance. This study aims to examine the influence of Counterproductive Work Behavior and Employee Engagement on Employee Performance within organizations in Indonesia. This research applies a quantitative approach using survey methods involving 175 employees from various organizational backgrounds. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire measured using a five-point Likert scale and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. The analysis process involved validity testing, reliability testing, classical assumption testing, and multiple linear regression analysis to evaluate the proposed hypotheses. The results indicate that Counterproductive Work Behavior has a significant negative influence on Employee Performance, indicating that increased counterproductive behavior reduces employee performance levels. Meanwhile, Employee Engagement demonstrates a significant positive influence on Employee Performance, showing that stronger employee involvement and psychological attachment contribute to improved performance outcomes. The coefficient of determination (R² = 0.510) indicates that Counterproductive Work Behavior and Employee Engagement explain 51.0% of the variation in employee performance. This study provides empirical evidence that organizations need to reduce dysfunctional workplace behaviors while strengthening employee engagement strategies to improve sustainable employee performance.