Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal)
Elia Putri Sari Siregar
Universitas Informatika dan Bisnis Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Perceived Compensation and Training Practices in Relation to Turnover Intention among Footwear Assembly Workers Indarta Priyana; Elia Putri Sari Siregar; Elan Rusnendar
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines shared and distinct associations of perceived compensation and training practices with turnover intention among footwear assembly employees. Respondent tables from a 2024 census survey of 50 workers in Majalaya, Indonesia, were reconstructed and reanalysed. Outcome scoring was aligned with construct meaning, and composites were recalculated from 15 items per scale. Ordinary least squares regression was supplemented with HC3 robust inference and response-pattern sensitivity analysis. Mean compensation and training ratings were low (1.723 and 1.788), while turnover intention averaged 4.311. Training had a negative adjusted association (B = −0.651, HC3 95% CI [−1.036, −0.265], p = .0014); compensation’s estimate was imprecise (B = −0.228, HC3 95% CI [−0.652, 0.196], p = .285). The model explained 80.3% of outcome variance, including 68.9 percentage points shared by the predictors. The qualitative pattern persisted in sensitivity analysis. Findings support a contextual training–withdrawal association, without implying that compensation is unimportant. The single-division, cross-sectional design and thesis-derived records limit causal interpretation and generalisation.
Co-Authors Elan Rusnendar Indarta Priyana