Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
Martaria Rizky Reinaldi
Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta
Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Psychometric Properties of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS) and The Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q) among Indonesian Millennial and Generation Z Employees Reny Yuniasanti; Dewi Soerna Anggraeni; Sheilla Varadhila Peristianto; Sri Muliati Abdullah; Nina Fitriana; Martaria Rizky Reinaldi
Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Vol. 28 No. 1 (2026): FEBRUARY 2026
Publisher : Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26486/psikologi.v28i1.5694

Abstract

Workplace use of psychological measures requires evidence of linguistic suitability and score consistency. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the 42-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-42) and the initially 21-item Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q) for Indonesian Millennial and Generation Z employees, and to conduct a preliminary examination of item discrimination and internal consistency. Adaptation followed six stages: forward translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert review, pretesting, and final consideration of the adapted items. The purposively recruited sample comprised 100 employees. Corrected item–total correlations were 0.685–0.879 for DASS-42 Stress, 0.701–0.898 for Depression, 0.591–0.842 for Anxiety, and 0.401–0.770 for retained SCD-Q items. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were 0.957, 0.961, 0.935, and 0.926, respectively. One SCD-Q item was excluded after a corrected item–total correlation of 0.118, leaving 20 retained items. The results provide preliminary evidence of item discrimination and internal consistency in this sample. Factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity were not examined, and further validation in larger, more diverse workplace samples is required.
Co-Authors Dewi Soerna Anggraeni Nina Fitriana Reny Yuniasanti Sheilla Varadhila P Sri Muliati Abdullah