Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.888
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cita Hukum Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurisprudence Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Sultan : Riset Hukum Tata Negara
Karsa, Pipih Ludia
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
PROSPEK KEBIJAKAN DALAM PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM NASIONAL BARBASIS PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT PADA ERA 4.0 Muin, Fatkhul; Karsa, Pipih Ludia
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol 9, No 1 (2019): Vol. 9, No. 1, Juni 2019
Publisher : Muhammadiyah University Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v9i1.8094

Abstract

Tujuan: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengkaji paradigma pembangunan hukum dalam kerangka tujuan negara era industry dan (2) mengelaborasi pembangunan hukum nasional dan partisipasi masyarakat di Era 4.0 Metodologi: Tulisan ini menggunakan metodologi penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif melalui studi pustaka secara menyeluruh (holistic). Temuan: Dalam memahami pembangunan  hukum, dapat melalui dimensi regulasi dan turunan-turunan regulasi, dimana tinjauan utama pada 3 (tiga) persepktif utama pada konsideran, yaitu pada aspek filosofis, aspek sosiologis dan aspek yuridis. Ketiga hal tersebut dapat menjadi landasan dalam pembangunan hukum nasional dengan melibatkan masyarakat secara langsung dalam penentuan kebijakan hukum. Kegunaan: Kebijakan sistem pembangunan nasional harus mengatur tentang partisipasi masyarakat dalam industry 4.0 sehingga peran tersebut tidak hanya dijalanan oleh negara. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Dalam Era Industri 4.0, peran pembangunan dalam sistem pembangunan nasional tidak hanya bertempu pada negara yang memiliki alat kewenangan, tapi masyarakat juga harus berpartisipasi penuh dalam sistem pembangunan nasional.
INTITUTIONAL ARRENGGEMENTS IN LOCAL GOVERMENT SERANG CITY THROUGHT MAPPING DISTRICT PETENTIAL BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM PRINCIPLES Karsa, Pipih Ludia; Mu’in, Fatkhul
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (359.932 KB) | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v4i1.2665

Abstract

Structuring through mapping can be done at the district level which has characteristicsthat can be the same and also different, but the structuring process needs to be based onlocal wisdom in order to maintain the cultural identity and values that grow anddevelop in the midst of society. For this reason, structuring will be correlated withpotential mapping, to support regional administration in the city of Serang bymaintaining the values of local wisdom in each district. This is intended to correlate thepotential with the authority possessed by other institutions (offices) so that it will havean impact on determining the competency of the apparatus human resources in thedistrict appropriately. Based on data from the Serang City BPS in 2019, the subdistricts in Serang City, if viewed from the potential, area, population, agriculture,industry, sports and accommodation / hotel services have the same and differentpotentials. Taktakan Subdistrict has the most extensive area, namely 57.98, but for thepopulation of Serang District the highest, which is 228,563. For the agricultural sectorand the industrial sector, all sub-districts have it, while for Hotels / AccommodationServices, only the district of Cipocok Jaya and the District of Serang have this potential.As for sports facilities, the district of Cipocok Jaya and Walantaka do not have it. Onthis basis, the Regional Government of Serang City can develop, synchronize andharmonize the potential of sub-districts with the projected institutional arrangement.
FUNGSI DAN KEWENANGAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT SECARA KONSTITUSIONALITAS DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN NEGARA PASCA REFORMASI Barlian, Iyan; Karsa, Pipih Ludia
Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46306/rj.v3i2.80

Abstract

The administration of government, either in state power in the context of separation of powers (Separation Of Power), or division of powers (Distribution Of Power), the role of representative institutions participates with some of the functions and authorities it has. In Indonesia, the function of the House of Representatives has a Legislative Function, a Supervision Function, a Budget Function, all of which need synergy. Although its main function is legislation, its controlling function also needs to be effectively optimized in conducting supervision related to the implementation of government. As for the budget function, this will be related to the welfare of the people. While the authority or power based on the 1945 Constitution as a result of changes in the power of the DPR was enlarged including: The DPR is given the power to give consideration to the President in appointing Ambassadors and receiving ambassadors for the placement of other countries, providing amnesty and abolition, the DPR is also given power in the form of giving approval if the President wants to make agreements with other countries, whether in the economic sector, peace agreements,  declare war and other international treaties affecting territorial integrity. The DPR is also given budget rights, elects BPK members, by observing DPD advice, gives approval in the event that the President appoints or dismisses KY members and nominates 3 Constitutional Court judges. People's representation in representative institutions (DPR) can be said to be channeled if the interests of the values, aspirations, and opinions of the people represented have been fought for in the framework of people's welfare, both through the pattern of optimizing functions and the correlation of authority with other institutions
POTENSI KONFLIK NORMA TERHADAP PERSIDANGAN TELECONFERENCE PERADILAN PIDANA SEBAGAI ADAPTASI BARU AKIBAT VIRUS COVID-19 Al Arif F., M. Noor Fajar; Karsa, Pipih Ludia
Perspektif Vol. 26 No. 3 (2021): Edisi September
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v26i3.805

Abstract

Mewabahnya virus Covid-19 yang menyebar ke seluruh dunia telah memberikan dampak dari segi ekonomi, sosial, budaya, dan hukum. Dampak perubahan hukum pun terjadi di Indonesia. Munculnya Perjanjian Kerjasama No. 402/DJU/HM.01.1/4/2020, No. KEP.17/E/Ejp/4/2020 dan No. Pas-06.HH.05.05 Tahun 2020 tentang Pelaksanaan Persidangan Melalui Teleconference menjadi dasar hukum penerapan persidangan melalui media teleconference. Namun, penerapannya berpotensi menimbulkan konflik norma berupa disharmonisasi antara persidangan teleconference dengan norma dalam KUHAP. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis potensi konflik norma yang terjadi, khususnya antara perjanjian kerjasama dengan KUHAP. Penelitian yuridis normatif ini menggunakan data dari sumber hukum primer dan sekunder yang dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian adalah pemeriksaan persidangan pemeriksaan terdakwa dengan menggunakan media teleconference menimbulkan konflik norma dengan aturan dalam ketentuan Pasal 154 KUHAP dan adanya ketidaksiapan dari aspek struktur hukum dimana tidak ada aturan hukum yang lebih tinggi dari KUHAP yang menjadi payung hukum, kendala jaringan internet dalam pemeriksaan terdakwa dan kecakapan masyarakat dalam penggunaan teknologi informasi.The outbreak of the Covid-19 virus that has spread throughout the world has had an economic, social, cultural and legal impact. The impact of legal changes also occurred in Indonesia. The emergence of the Cooperation Agreement Number 402/DJU/HM.01.1/4/2020, Number KEP.17/E/Ejp/4/2020 and Number Pas-06.HH.05.05 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Trials Through Teleconference became the legal basis for implementing trials through teleconference media. However, its application has the potential to cause a conflict of norms in the form of disharmony between the teleconference trial and the norms in the Criminal Procedure Code. This study aims to analyze the potential conflicts of norms that occur, especially between the cooperation agreement with the Criminal Procedure Code. This normative juridical research uses data from primary and secondary legal sources which are analyzed using qualitative analysis. The results of the study were that the examination of the defendant’s examination trial using teleconference media caused a conflict of norms with the rules in the provisions of Article 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code and there was an unpreparedness from the aspect of the legal structure where there was no legal rule higher than the Criminal Procedure Code which became the legal umbrella, internet network constraints in the examination of the defendant and community skills in the use of information technology.
PEMBENTUKAN KECAMATAN DI KOTA SERANG: PENGUATAN OTONOMI DAERAH DAN GOOD GOVERNANCE DALAM PELAYANAN PUBLIK Al Arif, M. Noor Fajar; Karsa, Pipih Ludia
Perspektif Vol. 27 No. 2 (2022): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v27i2.827

Abstract

Pembentukan kecamatan dalam sistem pemerintahan daerah merupakan penunjang dalam meningkatkan peran pemerintah daerah sekaligus pelayanan terhadap masyarakat. Pembentukan kecamatan di (Kabupaten/Kota) merupakan upaya memproporsionalitaskan kelembagaan di tingkat pemerintah daerah. Pembentukan Kecamatan baru akan memberikan pelayanan pada masyarakat setelah peralihan kewenangan dari kecamatan induk sehingga simpul sederhana dengan rentang kendali akan berdampak pada pelayanan yang efektif, efisien dan berkualitas. Jika ditinjau dari persyaratan dasar (jumlah penduduk, luas wilayah, cakupan wilayah dan usia kecamatan), maka terdapat 3 (tiga) kecamatan di Kota Serang yang memiliki potensi dan proyeksi untuk dilakukan pemekaran, yakni Kecamatan Walantaka, Kecamatan Serang, dan Cipocok Jaya. Penelitian hukum normatif ini mengkaji mengenai kebijakan Pemerintah Kota Serang dalam pembentukan kecamatan sebagai upaya untuk meningkatkan pelayanan, memperpendek rentang kendali dan memberikan kesejahteraan pada masyarakat sesuai dengan prinsip otonomi daerah dan good governance. Pembahasan diarahkan pada tiga aspek, pertama mengenai konsep otonomi daerah, good governance dan pemerintahan daerah dengan mengacu pada instrumen hukum terkait. Proses pembentukan kecamatan hendaknya tidak hanya ditinjau dari persyaratan dasar saja namun juga termasuk persyaratan teknis dan persyaratan administrasi yang menjadi bagian secara integral dalam pembentukan kecamatan baru.The formation of sub-districts in the local government system is a support in increasing the role of local governments as well as services to the community. The formation of sub-districts at the regional level is intended as an effort to proportionate institutions at the local government level. The establishment of a new sub-district will provide services to the community after the transfer of authority from the main sub-district, so it will have an impact on efficiency and quality services. Based in standart requirements (population, area, area coverage and age of the sub-district), there are 3 (three) sub-districts in Serang City which have the potential and projections for expansion, namely Walantaka District, Serang District and Cipocok Jaya. This normative legal research examines the Serang City Government’s policies in the formation of sub-districts as an effort to improve services, shorten the span of control and provide welfare to the community in accordance with the principles of regional autonomy and good governance. The discussion is directed at three aspects, the first is regarding the concept of regional autonomy, good governance and regional government with reference to the related legal instruments. The process of forming a sub-district should not only be viewed from the basic requirements but also includes the technical requirements and administrative requirements that become an integral part in the formation of a new sub-district.
Prospect of Judicial Preview in the Constitutional Court Based on the Construction of Constitutional Law Akmal, Diya Ul; Muin, Fatkhul; Karsa, Pipih Ludia
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v8i3.16940

Abstract

AbstractThe Constitutional Court is a state institution that has the authority for reviewing laws against the Constitution (Judicial Review). Several times in issuing its decisions, the Constitutional Court has acted as a Positive Legislator. The potential for a legal vacuum as the implication of revoking a law is large. and also the slow formation of laws by the legislative body (DPR) and the lack of quality of regulations. The current law-making does not pay attention to legal ideals based on Pancasila so that the resulting legal products lose their meaning. This has resulted in many people whose constitutional rights have been violated. The state should be present to give full constitutional rights to its citizens. The Constitutional Court needs additional authority to maintain the supremacy of the constitution. additional authority as a preventive mechanism is Judicial Preview. The French state places Judicial Preview as an authority of the Constitutional Council. Austria and Germany apply Judicial Preview as a preventive measure for losses that can occur if the Draft Law is passed. A renewal of the Constitutional Law to perfect existing ones makes the prospect of Judicial Preview in Indonesia an Urgency for immediate implementation.Keywords: Constitutional Court, Authority, Judicial Preview AbstrakMahkamah Konstitusi merupakan lembaga negara yang memiliki kewenangan pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar (Judicial Review). Dalam mengeluarkan putusannya Mahkamah Konstitusi beberapa kali bertindak sebagai Positif Legislator. Potensi terjadinya kekosongan hukum sebagai implikasi dicabutnya suatu Undang-Undang sangatlah besar. Ditambah dengan lambatnya pembentukan Undang-Undang oleh lembaga legislatif (DPR) serta kualitas peraturan yang kurang. Pembuatan Undang-Undang saat ini tidak memperhatikan cita hukum yang berakar pada Pancasila sehingga produk hukum yang dihasilkan kehilangan maknanya. Hal ini mengakibatkan banyak masyarakat yang dilanggar hak konstitusionalnya. Negara seharusnya hadir untuk memberikan hak konstitusional secara penuh kepada warga negaranya. Untuk mencegah hal tersebut maka Mahkamah Konstitusi membutuhkan suatu kewenangan tambahan untuk menjaga tegaknya supremasi konstitusi. Kewenangan tambahan sebagai mekanisme preventif tersebut berupa Pengujian Rancangan Undang-Undang (Judicial Preview). Perancis menempatkan Judicial Preview sebagai kewenangan dari Constitutional Council. Austria dan Jerman juga memberlakukannya sebagai tindakan pencegahan. Pembangunan Hukum Konstitusi untuk menyempurnakan yang sudah ada menjadikan prospek Pengujian Rancangan Undang-Undang di Indonesia menjadi urgensi untuk segera diterapkan.Kata Kunci: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Kewenangan, Judicial Preview АннотацияКонституционный суд - это государственное учреждение, которое имеет право проверять законы на предмет соответствия Конституции. Вынося свои решения, Конституционный суд несколько раз выступал в качестве позитивного законодателя. Потенциал правового вакуума как последствия отмены закона огромен, особенно в сочетании с медленным формированием законов законодательным органом (DPR) и отсутствием качественных нормативных актов. Текущее формирование законодательства не обращает внимания на идеалы права, укоренившиеся в Pancasila, так что получаемые легальные продукты теряют свое значение. Это привело к тому, что конституционные права многих людей были нарушены. Государство должно присутствовать, чтобы предоставить своим гражданам полные конституционные права. Чтобы этого не произошло, Конституционному суду необходимы дополнительные полномочия для защиты верховенства конституции. Дополнительные полномочия в качестве превентивного механизма представлены в форме судебного предварительного надзора (Judicial Preview). Франция помещает судебный предварительный надзор в ведение Конституционного Совета. Австрия и Германия также приняли его в качестве меры предосторожности. Разработка Конституционного закона с целью усовершенствования существующего делает перспективу судебного надзора в Индонезии неотложной его реализацией.Ключевые Слова: Конституционный Суд, Власть, Судебный Надзор 
Analisis Konstitusional Larangan Rangkap Jabatan Wakil Menteri Di Indonesia Muhammad Safaat Gunawan; Karsa, Pipih Ludia; Pradana, Syafa'at Anugrah; Mirdedi; Eki Furqon
JURNAL SULTAN: Riset Hukum Tata Negara Volume 4 Nomor 1 Oktober 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/sultan_htn.v4i1.15296

Abstract

The phenomenon of Deputy Ministers holding concurrent positions as commissioners or supervisory board members in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) reveals a serious problem in Indonesian constitutional practice, namely the lack of synchronization between legal norms and political behavior. Various laws and regulations, such as Law No. 39 of 2008 on State Ministries, Law No. 25 of 2009 on Public Services, and Law No. 19 of 2003 on SOEs, explicitly and imperatively prohibit public officials, including Deputy Ministers, from holding positions that have the potential to cause conflicts of interest. This provision is reinforced by Constitutional Court Decisions No. 79/PUU-IX/2011 and No. 80/PUU-XVII/2019, which confirm that Deputy Ministers are part of the government cabinet and are therefore subject to the same restrictions on concurrent positions as Ministers. This study uses a normative juridical approach with legislative, conceptual, and case analysis to examine the clarity of the norm prohibiting concurrent positions and the direction of legal reform needed. The results of the study confirm that the prohibition on holding multiple positions is binding and must be enforced in accordance with the mandate of the law and the decision of the Constitutional Court. In addition, there is a tendency for a constitutional crisis to occur in the government. Therefore, regulatory reforms are needed to reinforce this prohibition at the legislative level and limit the executive's authority in determining public positions. Keywords : Dual roles, Regulatory reform, Constitutional crisis.
Co-Authors Al Arif F., M. Noor Fajar Al Arif, M. Noor Fajar Barlian, Iyan Diya Ul Akmal Eki Furqon FATKHUL MUIN Mirdedi Mu’in, Fatkhul Muhammad Safaat Gunawan Pradana, Syafa’at Anugrah