Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KONSUMEN AKIBAT PRICE FIXING AGREEMENT PADA TARIF ANGKUTAN UDARA YANG MENYEBABKAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT Ulya, Rahmatul; Rahmayani, Nuzul; Adriaman, Mahlil
The Juris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v7i2.923

Abstract

A price fixing agreement is an agreement practice entered into by companies in the same industry to fix prices for goods/services together in the relevant market. Price fixing agreements on air freight rates have a negative impact on business competition, especially for consumers who use air transport services. This study aims to determine the form of price fixing agreement practices on air freight rates and the form of legal protection for consumers against price fixing agreements on air freight rates. This research uses normative legal research methods through literature study. The results of this study indicate that business actors who enter into price fixing agreements to increase the price of airplane tickets beyond the specified tarif limit have violated the provisions of business competition law, which can harm consumers. The legal protection provided to consumers in the form of preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection depends on the jurisdiction and the applicable legal framework.
Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen (Studi Putusan Nomor 11/Pdt.G/2022/PN Bkt) Lestiani, Karina; Rahmayani, Nuzul; Andriaman, Mahlil
Wajah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v7i2.1186

Abstract

Activities between consumers and consumer financing institutions will occur if there is an agreement. In an agreement, an action cannot be separated from a person who cannot fulfill his obligations so that it can be said to have committed a negligence or made a mistake which is called a default. This research discusses Defaults in Consumer Financing Agreements (Decision Study Number 11/Pdt.G/2022/PN BKt). This research raises two problems, namely 1) How is the implementation of the agreement in consumer financing default cases based on the decision of the Bukitinggi District Court Number 11/Pdt.G/2022/PN Bkt? 2) What is the analysis of the judge's considerations in settling default cases in consumer financing agreements based on Bukitinggi District Court decision No. 11/Pdt.G/2022/PN Bkt? This study uses a normative juridical method. The data source used is secondary data, namely data obtained through a literature study with primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Data collection was carried out by (normative juridical) by using library research (library research) which is a data collection tool that is not directed directly to research subjects. The data analysis used is a qualitative analysis. The results of the study show how the judge considers the settlement of default cases in consumer financing agreements based on the decision of the Bukitinggi District Court Number 11/Pdt.G/2022/PN Bkt and the legal consequences of engagement from a civil aspect in the occurrence of default for both parties in case Number 11/Pdt .G/2022/PN Bkt.. In this decision the judge decided that PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance who defaulted on CV. Roberto First Works. The judge should have decided based on the Civil Code, to determine whether someone has defaulted based on the provisions of Article 1238 of the Civil Code13. In this case the legal consequence of the engagement from a civil aspect in the occurrence of default for both parties is to punish PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance to pay the costs of the case until the trial has been decided in the amount of Rp. 616,000 (six hundred and sixteen thousand rupiah).
Pengaruh Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia terkait Legalitas Bitcoin sebagai Aset Digital di Indonesia Kurniawan, Ihsan; Rahmayani, Nuzul; Nazar, Jasman
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.857

Abstract

This study aims to explain how the legality of bitcoin as a digital asset in Indonesia is viewed from Indonesian positive law and the influence of the MUI fatwa regarding the legality of bitcoin as a digital asset. The problem here is that even though MUI has issued a Fatwa regarding the haram of Bitcoin both as a means of payment and as a digital asset, cryptocurrency transactions are mostly used as speculation which results in elements of gharar and maysir. But until now the use of crypto money has not decreased and even arguably more enthusiasts. From this research, it was found that Bank Indonesia responded that Bitcoin does not have legality as a legal transaction tool in Indonesia and is considered legal if Bitcoin is used as a crypto asset in the commodity futures exchange. Bappebti noted that the total number of crypto investors until the end of August 2022 has amounted to 16.1 million investors, which indicates that the number of crypto investors has increased by around 43.75% in the January-August 2022 period, experiencing a very high increase so that the influence caused by the MUI fatwa regarding the haram of bitcoin as a digital asset is not so significant because the nature of the MUI fatwa is only personal for someone who is Muslim. This research is expected to be a material and reading source for students to increase their knowledge and become a foundation for other researchers in the future.