Arief Setiawan Budi Nugroho
Civil And Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty Of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Analisis Faktor Risiko Cost of Quality Terhadap Failure Cost Pada Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Struktur Gedung Bertingkat: Analysis of Cost of Quality Risk Factors Against Failure Costs in Building Structure Work Viorenza Everlyn; Arief Setiawan Budi Nugroho; Andreas Triwiyono
Bentang : Jurnal Teoritis dan Terapan Bidang Rekayasa Sipil Vol 11 No 2 (2023): BENTANG Jurnal Teoritis dan Terapan Bidang Rekayasa Sipil (Juli 2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33558/bentang.v11i2.5959

Abstract

The success of the construction sector is inseparable from cost and quality, it is reported that identified quality failures reach 5-20% of the project contract value. To reduce quality failures and failure costs in the implementation of construction projects, it is necessary to provide cost of quality (COQ) assistance. In this research, reinforced concrete construction was chosen as the object of COQ assistance because it is a critical part of the structure. The purpose of this research is to categorize the COQ from internal and external factors and analyze the potential costs incurred for these failure factors. Analysis of the cost of quality failure was carried out based on the weighting of the results of the pairwise comparison matrix to obtain consistency index (CI) and Consistency ratio (CR) values and using the Kruskal Wallis test as a non-parametric test approach. The results of this research indicate that COQ greatly influences profitability, where the failure of the highest internal quality is the work method factor which affects the failure of the final concrete result in the form of structural and visual defects, while the highest external quality failure is the product selection factor at the client's request which causes the resulting construction products are not in accordance with the specifications or not in accordance with the expected function. Based on the causal factors of the quality failure, the implementation control process affects the result of product quality to the point of causing clients to demand, replace, and repair during the warranty period. Failure costs that affect the highest contract value amounted to 7.26% of internal failures and 6.40% of external failures.
Kajian Putusan Pengadilan yang Membatalkan Putusan Arbitrase BANI pada Sengketa Kontrak Jasa Konstruksi Putri Cahya Pertiwi; Arief Setiawan Budi Nugroho; Richo Andi Wibowo
Teras Jurnal : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): Volume 14 Nomor 2, September 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MALIKUSSALEH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/tj.v14i2.1148

Abstract

Abstrak Penyelesaian sengketa kontrak konstruksi melalui arbitrase BANI pada kenyataannya tidak selalu memberikan putusan yang dapat diterima oleh para pihak yang berselisih. Dalam beberapa kasus, putusan BANI bahkan dibatalkan oleh Pengadilan. Penelitian ini mengkaji 35 putusan BANI yang diajukan permohonan pembatalan ke Pengadilan Negeri selama periode 2010 hingga 2022. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 14 putusan BANI dibatalkan oleh Pengadilan sehubungan dengan penilaian hakim yang menyatakan bahwa Arbiter kurang cermat dalam mendeteksi keberadaan unsur tipuan dalam perkara. Sementara itu kajian mendalam terhadap dua kasus pembatalan putusan BANI oleh Pengadilan menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan Hakim Pengadilan dalam menilai keabsahan dokumen yang menjadi sengketa dalam kontrak konstruksi dan mendeteksi adanya kecurangan lebih cermat dibandingkan Arbiter BANI. Namun demikian, Arbiter BANI relatif lebih baik dibanding Hakim Pengadilan dalam menilai substansi permasalahan kontrak konstruksi dan memahami permasalahan sengketanya. Kata kunci: Arbitrase, BANI, Keadilan, Kelembagaan yang Tangguh, Pembatalan Putusan, Pengadilan   Abstract The resolution of construction contract disputes through BANI does not always result in decisions that are acceptable to the conflicting parties. In some cases, BANI decisions have even been overturned by the courts. This study examined 35 BANI decisions that were challenged in District Courts during the period from 2010 to 2022. The research findings indicate that 14 BANI decisions were overturned by the courts due to the judges' assessment, which stated that the Arbitrators were insufficiently diligent in detecting elements of fraud in the case. Furthermore, an in-depth review of two cases in which BANI decisions were overturned by the courts indicated that the ability of the court judges to assess the validity of the documents in construction contract disputes and detect fraud was more accurate than that of the BANI Arbitrators. Nevertheless, the BANI Arbitrators were relatively better than the Court Judges in evaluating the substance of construction contract issues and understanding the dispute issues. Keywords: Arbitration, BANI, Justice, Strong Institutions, Cancellation of Judgment, Courts