Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Al-Iktisab: Journal of Islamic Economic Law Jurnal Pemberdayaan: Publikasi Hasil Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Al-Bayyinah Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law
maslul, syaifullahil
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Al-Bayyinah

 1 
From Judicial Restraint to Judicial Activism: A Comparison of Decisions Number 30-74/PUU-XII/2014 and 22/PUU-XV/2017 Maslul, Syaifullahil
Al-Bayyinah Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Al-Bayyinah
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Islamic Law Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/al-bayyinah.v9i2.10396

Abstract

In the case review of decision Number 30-74/PUU-XII/2014 and 22/PUU-XV/2017, the Constitutional Court experienced a shift from judicial restraint to judicial activism. The object of the case being tested was Article 7, paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law relating to the age limit for marriage. Article 7, paragraph 7 (1) of the Marriage Law is an open legal policy. In practice, the Constitutional Court applies the principle of judicial restraint as stated in the decision 30-74/PUU-XII/2014. This is different from decision 22/PUU-XV/2017. This essay formulates the shift in the Constitutional Court's stance from judicial restraint to judicial activism. The change in the Constitutional Court's stance opens up important questions regarding the consistency and limits of its authority in a state of law and living constitution in the Constitutional Court's decisions. This research uses a regulatory approach (statute approach) and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The results of this study are the differences in legal considerations in decisions 30-74/PUU-XII/2014 and 22/PUU-XV/2017. These differences arise in legal considerations and verdicts. Second, the shift of the Constitutional Court from judicial restraint to judicial activism is marked by differences in viewing the testing of open legal policies, the form of progressiveness of the Constitutional Court, and judicial activism in enforcing justice in a limited manner. Third, the living constitution theory requires the Constitutional Court to re-interpret the Constitutional Court's powers within the Constitution. This interpretation must be in line with the legal needs of society, particularly in the context of the age limit for marriage.
Co-Authors Fithroni, Fajar Sadewa, Alan Thonthowi Thonthowi Utami, Iyut Rizqi